Tuesday, May 31, 2005

For the time being*, the architectural spotlight in Chicago is square on Renzo Piano, who's unveiling his final design for the Art Institute Expansion which has its groundbreaking today, and which also sees an exhibition on the design open at the museum today. If that's not enough, news coverage is rampant:

:: Light and Airiness for Art Institute of Chicago's New Wing (New York Times)

:: A talk with the park (Sun-Times)

:: Museum bridge to connect art, popular park (Tribune - Kamin)

::
Grand transformation at the Art Institute (Tribune)

:: Art Institute to add new wing (Tribune - Kamin, again)

Missing image - artic.jpg
Click image for Chicago Tribune graphic on the expansion.

*Until Thom Mayne receives the Pritzker Prize at Millennium Park this evening.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Archinect links to CNN.com International's Special Report: Vision, which features visionaries like Norman Foster and Will Alsop, among many others.

Foster writes about the importance of building sustainably, the world's population growth, and the importance of living in cities. A sidebar online poll had the following unsettling, though unsurprising, stat when I voted:

Missing image - vision.jpg

I'll admit it's not the clearest question (Who is the we? Our elected officials? The public? Architects/Engineers/Developers? Whoever's voting?), but it definitely points to a lag between knowledge of a problem and application of solutions. In this case, the solutions will potentially take much longer to put into place than the very real impact of the problem.

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:46:00 PM, Blogger Tyler said...

How dare you use the word "visionary" to describe will Alsop.

He has about the same amount of "vision" as a rock.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, May 30, 2005

My weekly page update:
missing image - turrell2sm.jpg
Paper Temporary Studio in Paris, France by Shigeru Ban.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment - Memorial Day Edition:
Clusterf*ck Nation
James Howard Kunstler gives Americans something to think about as the summer vacation motoring season gets underway this weekend. See also this interview with Kunstler and this Wired/AP article.

Chrysler Building Turns 75
The New York Times Home & Garden section devotes its coverage this week to the world-famous skyscraper.

Bill S 189
A proposed bill to restore the observance of Memorial Day to May 30 instead of "a weekend of Bar B Q's, shopping bargains and beaches".

Pritzker Prize Ceremony
Thom Mayne will be awarded the Pritzker Prize at Millennium Park in Chicago tomorrow evening at 6:30pm, the same day as the groundbreaking of Renzo Piano's addition to the Art Institute and the opening of its exhibition, Zero Gravity: The Art Institute, Renzo Piano, and Building for a New Century. And of course, a companion book will be available.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, May 29, 2005

MAM

Finally visited the Milwaukee Art Museum and its signature addition by Santiago Calatrava earlier today.

Missing image - milwaukee1.jpg
The bird-like brise-soleil is especially impressive from the approach via the Calatrava-designed footbridge.

Missing image - milwaukee2.jpg
In the space below the brise-soleil, their presence is diminished by the deep mullions of the glass walls.

Missing image - milwaukee3.jpg
The long wait in line for admission is lightened by site-specific artwork in the West Galleria, in this case a work of words by Liam Gillick.

Missing image - milwaukee4.jpg
One of my favorite's in the Museum's permanent collection is Modernity circa 1952, Mirrored and Reflected Infinitely, 2004 by Josiah McElheny.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, May 27, 2005

From The Guardian's article on Brad Pitt designing a restaurant and residential penthouse in Frank Gehry's redevelopment of the Hove seafront (my amendments in [brackets]):
Brad Pitt
Missing image - brad.jpg
Born
Shawnee, Oklahoma, US
Age
41
Career highlights
Johnny Suede, Fight Club, Ocean's 11 [Se7en, Twelve Monkeys, Snatch]
Career lowlights
Seven Years in Tibet, Meet Joe Black [Troy, Interview with the Vampire]
Why he matters
'He combines the matinee idol looks of Gary Cooper with the sex symbol loveliness of Marilyn Monroe' [He's one of the most popular actors in the world.]

Frank Gehry
Missing image - frank.jpg
Born
Toronto, Canada
Age
76
Career highlights
Guggenheim Museum, Bilbao; Walt Disney concert hall, Los Angeles [DG Bank, Berlin; Cardboard and Bentwood Furniture]
Career lowlights
Experience Music Project, Seattle [American Center, Paris]
Why he matters
'One of the most prominent contemporary American architects with his open, curvilinear, diverse and sometimes playful west coast style'. [He's the most famous living architect in the world.]

1 Comments:

At Friday, May 27, 2005 7:29:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I don't like the Experience Music Project either. While he does draw attention to architecture, he's being iconoclastic. Mr. Gehry is just being flashy. One of my favorite architecture words is contextuality. His designs are meant to stand alone. It kinda irks me.

Brad Pitt is good at acting. He should stick with that.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Starting June 10, photographs of Terry Evans will be on display in Chicago's Millennium Park. Titled Revealing Chicago: An Aerial Portrait, an online version of the exhibition is up and running already. The well-designed, interactive maps (political, physical, protected lands) stretch from the Kankakee River in the south and Portage, Indiana in the east to Geneva in the west and the Wisconsin border in the north, with an extra downtown blow-up. Thematic galleries (steel mills, neighborhoods, lakefront, suburbs, farming, etc.) provide additional browsing options. Either way, the photographs are especially beautiful, making the site a welcome distraction.

Here's a sampling:

Missing image - evans1.jpg
IIT Student Center by Rem Koolhaas

Missing image - evans2.jpg
City Farm near Cabrini Green

Missing image - evans3.jpg
Metropolitan Correctional Center by Harry Weese

Missing image - evans4.jpg
Suburbia

The exhibition is a collaboration between Openlands Project and Chicago Metropolis 2020.

(via Gapers Block)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, May 26, 2005

If you're up for flexing your archi-democratic muscles, point your mouse to the 2005 Prix d'excellence en architecture de l'Ordre des Architectes du Québec. 32 projects are finalists for the award, with voting by the public available - YOU - until July 31.

Missing image - choix.jpg

Finalists include:
:: Anne Carrier Architectes

:: Croft Pelletier Architectes

:: Faucher Aubertin Brodeur Gauthier

:: Dan S. Hanganu Architectes

:: Hal Ingberg/James Aitken

:: Lapointe, Voyer, Lemay et Associés (pictured)

:: Marosi + Troy Architectes/Jodoin Lamarre Pratte

:: Saucier Perrotte Architectes

:: Pierre Thibault

:: And many, many more!
Project pages feature extensive galleries, so even if you aren't voting you should have fun browsing.

3 Comments:

At Friday, May 27, 2005 9:21:00 AM, Blogger Frank said...

Cool stuff. I have seen many of these around town. L'École Nationale de L'Humour is two floors below us so we see some pretty funny looking people in the elevators. Mountain Coop is a cool space, though the exterior isn't special. The Quartier international de Montréal is nice for it's reorganization of Victoria Square to it's original design and the public space created between Conference Center addition and the new Caisse de Depot. Maybe Nathalie's project will make the list next year.

 
At Friday, May 27, 2005 1:25:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Yea, there's a lot of great-looking projects there. I would guess that something like Saucier + Perrotte's project or the Cirque du Soleil one will win. Guess we'll see...

 
At Friday, July 22, 2005 2:45:00 PM, Anonymous antoine said...

very cool house too ! Good Idea to present the "choix du public"

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Missing image - vanalen1.jpg

At 1pm EST today, the Coney Island Development Association and the Van Alen Institute announces the winner of the Parachute Pavilion, an open ideas competition for a year-round structure at the base of the famous Parachute Jump. Having registered but not completed the competition, I'm especially eager to see the winning design. I'll post some images and information on the winning entry once it becomes available.

And the winner is...the team of Kevin Carmody, Andrew Groarke, Chris Hardie and Lewis Kinneir, of London, chosen from more than 850 entries from 46 countries. According to Van Alen's press release, "The winning design team receives $10,000 and the opportunity to work with Van Alen Institute to develop a program and a publication that demonstrate the role of powerful design in improving the City...Second prize of $5,000 was awarded to Ramon Knoester and Eckart Graeve of Brooklyn and the Netherlands, and the $3,000 third prize went to Roman Torres, Patrick Stinger, Mayva Marshall and Adam Montalbano of Philadelphia. There were nine Honorable Mentions representing entries from London, Paris, Copenhagen, Athens and the Netherlands, as well as the United States."

Views of the winning entry:

Missing image - vanalen2.jpg

Missing image - vanalen3.jpg

Update 05.27: All the entries can be viewed right here.

3 Comments:

At Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:00:00 PM, Anonymous Lil'G said...

Big F*#^%in deal! Of ocurse I am reacting to the two images, but I can't see why this should be a winner (Unless no one else entered)

 
At Friday, May 27, 2005 11:17:00 AM, Blogger John said...

I'll admit I like, but mainly due to the fact it features two elements that would have been present in our competition entry (had we actually submitted).

1. Making the boardwalk level transparent and raising a solid mass above that also acts as cover. Given the site and its constraints, doing this creates more boardwalk within the building and gives some visual and perhaps physical continuity to the pedestrian movement across the site. You'd probably need to see the site to know exactly what I mean (the boardwalk makes an L around the site), so you'll have to trust me.

2. Opening up part of the roof to frame the Parachute Jump. While we were thinking of a circular or elliptical opening that tapered as it reached towards the sky, the general idea of framing this rather appealing object is the same.

 
At Thursday, June 02, 2005 7:39:00 AM, Anonymous Kathy Reid said...

Is the winning team the same team that won last years Burnham Prize in Chicago?

Perhaps lil'g should upload images of their scheme?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, May 25, 2005

On display now at the Philbrook Museum of Art in Tulsa, Oklahoma are various structures scattered across the newly renovated grounds and gardens, as part of the exhibit LANDed: Innovative Garden Structures.

Missing image - landed.jpg
Vines by MADE

In an essay on the exhibition, Brian J. Ferriso asserts "the LANDed structures create a garden experience like no other: a provocative experiential display of creativity that directly addresses the concept of the formal garden, its structures, and their relationship in the future."

The architects in the exhibition:
:: Della Valle + Bernheimer Design, Brooklyn (Butterflies)

:: designsubset, Austin (ROAMroom)

:: Lyn Rice Architects, New York ([AND]SCAPES)

:: MADE, Brooklyn (Vines)

:: Mitnick Roddier Hicks, San Francisco (Split/View)

Thanks to Eric M. for the head's up.

5 Comments:

At Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:39:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not to be too picky but Mitnick Roddier Hicks is from Ann Arbor not San Francisco.

 
At Friday, May 27, 2005 1:39:00 AM, Anonymous johnr said...

Call ahead before you go to the Philbrook. I went out of my way while driving near Tulsa to visit and discovered that construction was not complete. The small show of the Joseph McIlheny(?) mirrored glass work is really amazing but the piece of his at the MOMA is a much better installation.

 
At Friday, May 27, 2005 11:06:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, they are not all finished yet even now.

 
At Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:32:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm from Tulsa, beeeaaach.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 12:16:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

They are complete. Please visit.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, May 24, 2005

Flipping through Surface Magazine's 2005 Design Issue, I discovered a couple unbuilt, single-family house designs by Stanley Saitowitz, featured in an article on dot-com dreams gone awry in and around San Francisco, the epicenter of tech money in the 90s. The Zakin and Davis Houses both feature long, linear bars that bend and overlap each other, ending in dramatic cantilevers that strain towards the ideal vista.

Missing image - zakin.jpg
Zakin Residence

Missing image - davis.jpg
Davis Residence

These large houses seem to fall into a series of designs - also including the Kahn and Omega 3 projects - that use linear bars to define outdoor spaces, frame vistas, and instill each house with a unique sequence of movement and spatial relationships, especially when compared to typical residential design. In relation to Saitowitz's previous, built houses, these are extravagant, their expense (both land and building) and failure a product of the dot-com bubble and bust. While this means similar designs, in terms of scale and size, aren't appropriate now, their value in expanding the architect's talents and ways of approaching the single-family house may mean great things are on the horizon.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, May 23, 2005

My weekly page update:
missing image - turrell2sm.jpg
Tending, (Blue) in Dallas, Texas by James Turrell and Interloop A/D.

The updated book feature is Nasher Sculpture Center Handbook, edited by Steven A. Nash.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
The Straw House Blog
"In 2002 Glen Hunter & Joanne Sokolowski started building a house. It's made of straw, it's off the grid. This is their story."

Chicago's Building Boom
List of tall buildings in Chicago over 300', either recently completed, under construction, or proposed, with images.

BrownLAB - Part I
First in a series of four on Land + Living's coverage of a USC landscape architecture studio.

30 Bridges
Hugh Pearman's introduction to the book by Matthew Wells. (via City Comforts)

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:24:00 AM, Blogger HisHighness said...

Man, have you ever watched Wild On? Man that Jules Asner chick was hot, of course they got Brook Burke on there now, she's ok but Jules was a goddess!

Liberal For Life

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, May 20, 2005

Some Chi-town news briefs and happenings:

:: The Chicago Tribune reports that The Fordham Company approached Santiago Calatrava to design a residential high-rise on North Lake Shore Drive. Nothing more is known at this time, though it makes me wonder where exactly this tower would be located, since vacant lots along LSD are scarce (outside of 600 North which is slated for a pair of towers by Pappageorge/Haymes). Fordham Co. isn't exactly known for cutting-edge architecture, so the choice to solicit Calatrava is unexpected, though refreshing. It should be interesting to see what develops.

:: The Chicago Sun-Times reports that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will donate $11 million for the ailing Chicago Public Schools, specifically for small schools. Given the lack of state and federal funds for education, this is good news, though unfortunately it won't go too far towards improving facilities, constructing new schools, and other physical improvements to the system.

:: The sixth annual Great Chicago Places and Spaces is happening this weekend, kicked off tonight by an "intimate" talk with Bruce Mau, Stanley Tigerman and Lee Bey, according to the City of Chicago's page. It's at 6:30 at the Art Institute, it's free, and it's first-come, first-seated. See the Reader's listings for more information on the plethora of tours over the weekend.

:: On a related note, Metromix compiles a list of places to eat while checking out Great Places and Spaces.

:: The Southeast Environmental Task Force is holding a bus tour of Chicago's Industrial Southeast Side. Check their special events page for details.

:: Have a great weekend!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, May 19, 2005

A day after Donald Trump unveiled his borrowed design for the World Trade Center site in Lower Manhattan, the LMDC unveils its design for the Cultural Center, by Norway's Snøhetta.

Missing image - snohetta.jpg

The building is located in the northeast corner of the site, adjacent to each memorial footprint, itself taking on a similar form either dictated by the site or in respect to the voids.

With the recent Trumpian developments in this on-going drama, it looks like Snøhetta's design might be too abstract and impressionistic for most people to understand. Regardless, it might be the most tasteful design that has been presented to the public for the masterplan since the memorial competition.

1 Comments:

At Saturday, May 21, 2005 5:56:00 PM, Blogger Barry Ritholtz said...

Trump managed to turn, in just a few short decades, a large fortune in NY Real Estate into a decidely smaller one.

Not everyone can do that . . .



http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2005/05/real_estate_blo.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Following up on yesterday's post about Donald Trump unveiling his design to rebuild the Twin Towers, NY1 reports that the design is available online. Apparently the design is one that's been on the internet for a while now (linked in yesterday's post), designed by Kenneth Gardner and Herbert Belton. Further it appears that Trump is merely endorsing this design rather than commissioning a designer for something new. No surprises there.

Missing image - tt2.jpg
Libeskind/SOM :: Gardner/Belton

If you're a reader of this page, you've probably noticed that I don't think rebuilding the Twin Towers is the right thing to do, even though I'm not in love with Libeskind's master plan and the hybrid Freedom Tower. Instead of rushing into one or the other, perhaps it's time for all interested parties to step back and reevaluate what's going on at the WTC site, so New York doesn't end up with something that hurts the city, and therefore the country. Money, politics and symbolism seem to be overshadowing good urban planning, architecture, and other concerns on a path towards something either chaotic and confused or uninspired and boring.

Update: Newsday.com covers Trump's presentation of the Twin Tower design. In an over-the-top manner, the billionaire describes the winning master plan design "like a junk yard, a series of broken-down angles that don't match each other. And we have to live with this for hundreds of years?...It is the worst pile of crap architecture I've ever seen in my life." What he's not grasping is that the master plan designs aren't set; they'll be designed be individual architects and firms in the future and will much less resemble what's in the master plan much like Freedom Tower doesn't resemble Libeskind's 1,776-foot tower. And although they don't "match each other", the angles are part of a group gesture that creates a focus on the void of the memorial and site of the original towers.

Further, Trump describes the Freedom Tower as skeleton-like, saying "If we rebuild the World Trade Center in the form of a skeleton, the terrorists win." Ironically, Libeskind and Governor Pataki used that very word to describe the THINK team's runner-up bid for the WTC site, the association helping to pave the way for the architect's winning scheme. It looks like Trump is pulling a page from the person he's now trying to destroy. And in another subtle move, Trump will use his TV show, The Apprentice, to further his cause.

8 Comments:

At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:38:00 PM, Blogger javier said...

I just saw this on CNN's Inside the Blogs. I can't believe how much mud the Donald is raking.

 
At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:39:00 PM, Blogger javier said...

Yeah, the girls on CNN actually had Daily Dose up on the TV.
**I just saw this on CNN's Inside the Blogs. I can't believe how much mud the Donald is raking.

 
At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:09:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Talked with them after the fact. I'd like to check it out it's available on a free site...or I'll just break down and do a trial for CNN.

Quite the surprise.

 
At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:39:00 PM, Anonymous John said...

The freedom tower has always seemed to be a compromise - designed out of fear. I don't completely agree with his tactics, but I for one would be thrilled to see the twin towers rebuilt.

 
At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 8:15:00 PM, Blogger javier said...

Norman Foster's Twin Wow-ers!

 
At Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:39:00 AM, Blogger Stan said...

Good post, and I agree with you on all points.

It's a shame that a cheesy, faux "celebrity"/developer with a relatively bland sense of architectural tastes has to come lashing out at the Freedom Tower.

He actually makes Silverstein look good!

 
At Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:06:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

Wow! CNN!

I checked out this rebuild design for the towers. If they are going to rebuild it, at least do an exact copy of the exterior skin or something in the same spirit. It looks like the old towers up to the third floor then abruptly changes to a grid of square windows. The tall narrow windows of the original towers were probably not that great from the inside, but a better solution would be to reduce the width of the verticals. A crappy reproduction isn't any better than a good design that isn't to most people's taste.

 
At Friday, May 20, 2005 3:15:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Focusing on 'the void' is not a very optimistic way of thinking. The Freedom Tower design is skeleton-like and timid.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tyler Green posts both his favorite painting(s) in America and favorite American painting(s) in response to the National Gallery launching a search for Britain's favorite painting.

Throwing some suggestions into the mix, it didn't take long to think of my favorite paintings in America, both by my favorite painter Gerhard Richter and both in the permanent collections of American museums (correct me if I'm wrong).

Missing image - betty.jpg
Betty , 1988
St. Louis Art Museum

Missing image - 2candles.jpg
Two Candles, 1982
Art Institute of Chicago

Picking a favorite American painting is a bit more difficult, taking my mind back to a university class on Modern American Art. Given that choosing something like this comes down to personal taste, for me that would be mid 20th-century abstract and abstract expressionist art. Which means a favorite wouldn't be a single work but a range of work by individual artists. So, in no particular order:

:: Franz Kline
:: Robert Motherwell
:: Mark Rothko
:: Barnett Newman
:: Helen Frankenthaler
:: Jackson Pollock

2 Comments:

At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 11:59:00 AM, Blogger jimmy said...

My favorite painting in America is undoubtedly Matisse's Piano Lesson. (Manhattan MoMa)

Favorite American painter is alittle tougher, but I've always been partial to Philip Guston, if for no other reason than his daring return to figuration at a time when abstract expressionism reigned.

 
At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:31:00 PM, Blogger brandon said...

For me, Easily Richard Diebenkorn. A true overlooked, under appreciated master who never conformed but (re)defined the possibilities of abstraction. For him, it was a life long process of reduction to the essential elements of a landscape. The form of color, really. He avoided the rampant trends that made abstraction so successful (motion, gesture, etc...not that there not valid, but...)and developed logically and naturally to that level of abstraction so seldomly reached. It was never superfluous.

Richter is a close second for me as well. Although the range of work and the diligence he display over his mastery of color and form, there is something that does not grab me like a nine foot Diebenkorn landscape. The quality that excites me the most though about Richter is the ephemeral quality his landscapes have. They (to me at least) speak in such a way that the impressionist masters works do. They have two lives; one where you are consumed with a 4" square section which is a work unto itself and the life from across the room where all those focused points of light coalesce and become a given form. A memory, a moment captured in time yet timeless and familiar.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Looks like Donald Trump is going to follow through on his words from a couple weeks ago when he panned Freedom Tower and pushed for rebuilding the Twin Towers "only stronger and a little bit taller, even if it's only one story taller."
"They should...not build something that looks like an empty skeleton...The design for the Freedom Tower is an egghead design, designed by an egghead, which has no practical application and which, frankly, didn't look very good. I've gotten great reviews on my buildings. I'm somebody who believes strongly in great architecture and [Freedom Tower]...is just not a good design." (my italics)
It's obvious Trump isn't enamored with Libeskind and thinks very highly of his own taste, though I can't recall much positive praise for his buildings, which tend to be unexceptional at best. Ironically his Trump Tower in Chicago, which has received some good words in print for its design (though countered by criticism of its mass and siting), is designed by the same behemoth as the majority of Freedom Tower, SOM.

Missing image - trump.jpg

Now the New York Post reports that Trump will unveil "his own design for a rebuilt 111-story 'World Trade Center' at Ground Zero at a press conference tomorrow." The billionaire explains that they
"took the original World Trade Center design, brought it into the modern age, made it more beautiful than ever before, made it one story taller, made it higher lined, and took out the architectural weaknesses that were there...We also strengthened the building internally so that what happened on 9/11 could never happen again...Some people thought [the World Trade Center] was too monolithic. We've put on a higher lined curtain wall, which will make the exterior much more vivid and beautiful."
I'm not exactly sure what he's means when he says "higher lined", though we will know tomorrow when the model is unveiled. There's no mention of the architect designing this tower or if Team Twin Towers - a group pushing for the towers' reconstruction since their destruction - or any like-minded contemporaries are involved. Stay tuned.

7 Comments:

At Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:41:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I've been inside of his building on Columbus Circle. I don't remember the name of the building, but I'm sure the word Trump is in it. I didn't like it. If the Don has anything to do with a new Twin Towers, I'd rather have the Libeskind design.

Can't wait until tomorrow to see it.

 
At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:45:00 AM, Anonymous matt said...

can he just die already.

 
At Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:12:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

My guess is all of his positive responses have come from his 'yes' men and women.

 
At Friday, May 20, 2005 9:46:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

matt

can't you just die already? how very mature comment you left. though i don't expect much from wannabe journalists.

 
At Friday, May 20, 2005 8:50:00 PM, Blogger John Pszeniczny said...

I was in my car when I heard that Donald Trump was saying some things about the current proposed Freedom Tower. I have to agree with him and his reference to a skeleton. It is a frail design in my opinion. One thing the original towers sure weren't. I got home and couldn't find any news on it, so I decided to model my own idea for what I think it should look like.

Check it out. Liberty Tower

 
At Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:19:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only way Donald Trump can win the battle versus Childs, Liebeskind and the LMDC is to show that his new Twin Towers has a means of preventing entrapment of people during fire - or even another 9/11-like disaster.

Prettier, stronger, aircraft-proof construction is insufficient competitive differentiation - the Freedom Towers also offers all of that.

Mr. Trump should take a serious look at recently patented high-tech solutions for skyscraper evacuations, specifically U.S. Patent 6,598,703 B1.

If Mr. Trump can show that he can still get evacuees down safely from above the level of the fire or damage - in an automatically coordinated fashion - without much effort, without evacuees exposing themselves to a high ledge and most importantly without need to wait for ANY external assistance or rescue - Mr. Trump will WIN.

Donald Trump should focus on evacuation in his new Twin Towers because evacuation from above the 'fire zone' is the main issue.

As an analogy: Were ships built after the HMS Titanic sank - made to be iceberg-proof? No. All ships were mandated to have better evacuation systems. Since history is a guide, the same can only be expected from future skyscraper designs.


The patented device will also preserve revenue-generating real estate within the building - since it will decrease the need for 'safe' floors, more or wider stairwells, or super fortified elevator and stairwell walls.

Mr. Trump should make sure that the LMDC does not implement U.S. Patent 6,598,703 B1 ahead of him. If that happens Mr. Trump would surely lose the battle for Ground Zero.

Both Childs and Liebeskind have talked to the owner of the patent a year ago at a university conference in New York.

 
At Friday, June 10, 2005 6:29:00 PM, Blogger John said...

U.S. Patent 6,598,703 B1:

"Externally concealable, modular high-rise emergency evacuation apparatus with pre-qualified egress

Abstract

An externally concealable modular high-rise emergency evacuation apparatus that enables people, including the injured, the elder or drabled [disabled - john] persons to escape entrapment from or to bypass the levels of a high-rise building that is impassable due to flame, smoke or heavy damage, with very little effort or assistance, comprising a slanted cylindrical booth with a trap door bottom, elongated poles with trusses, expandable reinforced descent tubes with fire-proof skin, stabilizer webbings, an inflatable slide, and active components comprised of sensors, switches, latches and relays that coordinates, prequalifies and controls access then egress through the apparatus, with emphasis on checking the integrity of a complete escape path and approximating free space for each evacuee within said descent tubes, thereby enhancing supported evacuee volume and safety."

Makes ya wonder why anyone would want to work 100 - hell, 50 - floors up.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, May 16, 2005

My weekly page update:
missing image - archw2sm.jpg
B House in Portland, Oregon by Architecture W.

The updated book feature is Dark Age Ahead, by Jane Jacobs.

Here's some unrelated links for your enjoyment, after catching up on things from the last few days:
Encyclopedia Chicago
Online version of the book. Very thorough and well done. (Thanks to B.T.)

Chicago's Steel Heritage Project
The group responsible for pushing the preservation this part of Chicago's history has unveiled plans for a museum at the Acme Coke Plant by none other than Studio/Gang. I'll post images once I find some.

WTC Memorial Mock-up
At least one thing is running smoothly for the WTC site.

Architecture 2005
Special New York Times coverage.

Slicing and Dicing the Past to Get to the Future
Lynn Becker's latest.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

I'll be away from home and work for a few days, resuming posting on Monday. In the meantime here's a stumper for ya:

Missing image - where.jpg

Where is this sculpture?
Bonus: Who is the artist?

The winner gets a lollipop.

7 Comments:

At Wednesday, May 11, 2005 11:43:00 AM, Blogger Frank said...

I'm gonna take a wild guess and say it's behind the Newberry Library. That or someplace in Lincoln Park. I say Newberry because of the high ivy-covered brick wall.

 
At Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:06:00 AM, Blogger brandon said...

i say just south of chicago on like lasalle or something? Milles

I've seen it but cannot remember where in the hell it was. i dig it though. a big round monkey

 
At Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:02:00 AM, Blogger brandon said...

Oh! I think i remember. Cranbrook & it is definitely by Milles. Boo-yaaaaaah

 
At Thursday, May 12, 2005 6:00:00 PM, Anonymous Murray said...

Disney?

 
At Friday, May 13, 2005 9:58:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Toronto Sculpture Garden - sculpted the one and only Abu Garcia.


pay up!

 
At Saturday, May 14, 2005 4:42:00 AM, Anonymous Edward said...

University of Chicago in Hyde Park?

 
At Monday, May 16, 2005 10:13:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Brandon, you are correct! Expect your lollipop in 6-8 weeks. Thanks for playing.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

The opening ceremony of the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin, Germany is being held today, open to the public two days later.

Peter Eisenman's competition-winning design features a gridded field of approximately 2,700 concrete slabs (stelae - a usually carved or inscribed stone slab or pillar used for commemorative purposes) of varying height and an Information Center underneath. The design was approved in June 1999, almost six long years before its opening.

Missing image - stelae1.jpg

According to Eisenman,
The enormity and scale of the horror of the Holocaust is such that any attempt to represent it by traditional means is inevitably inadequate ... Our memorial attempts to present a new idea of memory as distinct from nostalgia ... We can only know the past today through a manifestation in the present.
In the past couple days, much has been written about the design, either praising or criticizing its abstraction and its author.

Missing image - stelae2.jpg
Image found here (via Gravestmor).

Grounded in the Maya Lin School of Memorial Design, Eisenman's non-representational design opts for mood over symbolism, striving to impress emotions on the visitor. The difficulty - and popularity - of this method is apparent in the WTC Memorial and other memorials designed since Lin's Vietnam Memorial in D.C., completed over twenty years ago. I like to separate Lin's "School" into two camps: the object and the field camps. Clearly, the Memorial in Berlin falls into the latter, where emotion is derived from the overwhelming number of stelae (similar to many WTC entries that used a large quantity of candles, trees, etc., to achieve the same end) and the visitor's movement across the field. Here that movement is affected by the varying heights of the slabs, at one moment low enough to act as a bench, at other moments towering over the visitor. The combination of regular grid and irregular, undulating tops is an effective combination; one can imagine the endlessly-different routes and sensations as one moves through the grid, glimpsing Berlin's modern context just beyond the memorial's edges.

But ultimately, like Lin's memorial in D.C., Eisenman's memorial must be experienced to be fully appreciated. Only then can one say if it is an effective memorial to the Holocaust and not (also) something else, arising from its abstraction and its concomitant ambiguity.

Update 05.16: Nancy Levinson at Pixel Points weighs in on the memorial design, with her always intelligent criticism as well as some fascinating alternatives proposed for the site.

6 Comments:

At Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:07:00 AM, Anonymous Edward said...

I'm here. In Berlin. Spent 5 hours at the Memorial yesterday. It's wonderful - because it's the only place in Berlin where I did NOT think of the Holocaust. The problem is not that it is abstract, the problem is that it is post-Modern. If you must pick a "style" rather than "timeless" - post-Modern equivocation is certainly the wrong style. I doubt the souls of the six million are post-Modern, bless them.
And the field is not large enough! You never get l