Thursday, June 30, 2005

Megan McMillan has handed off to me a music meme. Should be a nice change of pace from the WTC bashing. So, here it goes.

Total volume of music files on my computer:
At work: ~4 GB
At home: ~8 GB
Last CD I bought:
Bought 3 at the store last weekend:
In The Mud by Split Lip Rayfield
Faith (Deluxe Edition) by The Cure
A Brilliant Mistake by Tsunami
Song playing right now:
"Penny Reel-O" by Eric "Monty" Morris
A catchy ol' ska number from This Is Reggae Music: The Golden Era 1960-1975 box set.

and

"Monkey Man" by Toots & The Maytals from the same collection, among many other places.
Five songs I listen to a lot these days:
"Pink Love" by Blonde Redhead
One of the most indescribably beautiful songs I've heard in recent memory.

"Carnage Visors" by The Cure
The 28-minute reason I bought the Faith reissue. A soundtrack to an animated film that's mesmerizing even without the images.

"13" by Split Lip Rayfield
One of the reasons I'm taking banjo lessons.

"Those Pockets Are People/The Partisan" by Electrelane
7 minutes of Awesome Rock.

"Broken Chair" and "Still At Home" by Luna
Sean Eden's great songwriting contributions to Luna's swan song Rendezvous.
And now it's my turn to pass this meme along to a few others. How 'bout it Mr. Soy, Jimmy, and Marcus?

6 Comments:

At Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:12:00 PM, Blogger Megan McMillan said...

Great answers! I love Luna, and I'm looking forward to checking out some new tunes, thanks to you : )

Have fun in NYC!

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 4:27:00 PM, Blogger Micah said...

Mmmm... Carnage Visors. An extended hypnagogic dream. I've actually fallen asleep to that one (a lifetime ago; the 15-year-old obsessive Cure fan). Interesting what AMG had to say about it: "...a sprawling funeral march that gradually fades in and then out after half an hour, as if it's only a segment from a piece that's being generated until the end of time." Well, it does have a beginning and an end, but I sure get what they're saying.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 4:27:00 PM, Blogger Micah said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 4:58:00 PM, Blogger jimmy said...

That's funny (strange not ha ha) that you're currently listening to ska. The Last CD I bought was The Best of Desmod Dekker.

could there be a ska revival coming?

i'll post the rest when i get home today!

 
At Friday, July 01, 2005 8:42:00 AM, Anonymous marcus said...

Well, I have been having a little bit of a ska revival myself... I recently finally got around to putting all the rest of my old cd's into itunes and have subsequently been enjoying a whole lotta ska...

Not much Desmon Decker, but some Skatelites and Bim Skala Bim though.


I will get my gear up in the morning.

 
At Friday, July 01, 2005 1:49:00 PM, Blogger eBohn said...

John, for reasons you're well aware of, Mr. Soy's posting is going to be limited this weekend. I'll try and respond to the meme next Tuesday.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

As you probably know already, the latest revision to Freedom Tower was released today by Governor Pataki, Mayor Bloomberg, Larry Silverstein, and David Childs, basically everybody but the original designer. And even though Libeskind is now almost completely out of the picture (the only remnant of his winning masterplan for Freedom Tower is its 1,776' height), they did let Danny pose next to the slightly-reworked, highly-derivative design.

Missing image - wtc3a.jpg
Photos from Yahoo! News

This latest design is in response to NYPD/FD's safety concerns, particularly in regard to car and truck bombs. Given that, and that nobody's going to want to move their office into Freedom Tower if and when it's done, the architects placed the tapered glass tower on an impenetrable, windowless base 200' tall. Yep, two hundred feet tall.

Missing image - wtc3b.jpg

According to the LMDC's unintentionally-humorous web page, the 1,776-foot tall tower
:: Will Emit Light from Spire as a New Beacon of Freedom

:: Will Evoke Classic New York Skyscrapers in Elegance and Symmetry

:: Speaks to [the] Future While Solving Challenges of [the] Modern Urban Environment
According to Governor Pataki, this symmetrical tower design by David Childs "remains true to Daniel Libeskind'’s visionary master plan for the World Trade Center site...[and] will be a proud new icon that references great American symbols of strength and freedom such as the Statue of Liberty..." How's that? By abandoning the asymmetry that was part of a cohesive master plan of towers surrounding the site and referenced (to an arguable degree of success) the Statue of Liberty? By ousting Libeskind from the whole process entirely?

Mayor Bloomberg continued the empty political praise-fest, saying "This spectacular addition to our skyline will be a commanding architectural symbol...It is also an important part of our vision to transform Lower Manhattan into a vibrant 24-hour residential and commercial neighborhood." And how's that? By including in the program 0 s.f. of residential space and 2.6 million s.f. of office space? By not including residential space in any part of the masterplan?

Ignoring the fluffy praise and talk of a "new beacon of freedom", this latest design is definitely an improvement over the last design by Childs and Libeskind, and in some ways - as a stand-alone building - it's better than Libeskind's winning "place holder". But as an element in a larger masterplan, is it any good? What does it set up for the remaining towers and other structures to be built around it and the memorial? By being so purely symmetrical and bunker-like, it's basically ignoring its neighbors, saying it's more important than the larger urban fabric - present and future - of lower Manhattan. I hate to say it, but in some ways that fits in well with this country's behavior and stance toward the rest of the world since that tragic day almost four years ago.

Day after update: Curbed posts some views of the massive base from a fly-through movie at SOM's site.

13 Comments:

At Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:08:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is one ugly building.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 8:15:00 AM, Blogger perspective said...

Hi john, its a great conincidence that i found you and your blog. To make sure i visit this space regularly i am adding you to my blogger's list.

I'm reading the "The Next House" and "Feng Shui" by Lillan Too...
:)

Nice knowing you!

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 8:18:00 AM, Blogger perspective said...

"By being so purely symmetrical and bunker-like, it's basically ignoring its neighbors, saying it's more important than the larger urban fabric - present and future - of lower Manhattan. I hate to say it, but in some ways that fits in well with this country's behavior and stance toward the rest of the world since that tragic day almost four years ago."
Isnt it a reflection of the whole tragedy, and of the present goverment of the USA somehow?

And i would agree with the anonymous visitor, its ugly... both...the building and the attitude! In that sense...its so perfect for the place and the time...isnt it?

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:29:00 AM, Blogger brandon said...

It looks like a 1776' shaved carrot! And a very safe and obvious building.

First Childs rips off his students on multiple occasions and now is ripping off the people of NY and pulling the wool over every Americans eyes. What a joke. What a looser and an egomaniac. Imagine what could be done if for one day the daily military expenditures was given to this 'democratic' process. $2.97 billion dollars. Just one days worth to attempt to create something truly worthy of remembrance and projection. But instead we have a cry baby, copy cat egomaniac jumping up and down for attention. And this is all he is able to come up with. Hopefully there will be a "Take 4". All I can remember so far is the worst display of architectural politics and an even bleaker future for lower Manhattan

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:49:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's the dumbest building I've ever seen. And it's also a copy of another 200 skycraps of SOM.

The funny thing is Mr. Childs said of the new one, "It is a rare moment when new is better." He added: "I feel better about this than the original. The building is simpler, architecturally. It is unique, yet it subtly recalls, in the sky, the tragedy that has happened here."

Excuse me?? This a piece of crap!

A bunker with a twisted glass box on top.

You can what a couple of animations in the SOM site and it shows the lack of interest for the building surroundings, it's awful.

The developer must be thrilled becuase it will get his cheap building as he wanted form the start.

Politics kill the architecture in this country. Instead of using architecture as a tool to enrich the living of their citizens their just run after the money. It's a shame.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:54:00 AM, Blogger Michael Allen said...

Seems to be a regression to 1980's pomo dreck.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:30:00 AM, Blogger D. Phillips said...

it's a complete monstrosity, a plurality of New Yorkers won't even work there

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:26:00 PM, Anonymous Murray said...

Heavens to Betsy, please no. Hopefully this is another nessesary "place holder." Whack it with the Zaha stick.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:38:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

Though I have circled the bases of the Former World Trade Center Towers, I never did go in. Didn't have to. Their greatness could be experienced by standing at their base and looking straight up. From that point of view, you can't tell where they end.

But we all know where they ended.

I don't know anyone who died in the attacks. I don't know people who know people who died in the attacks. I am an American nonetheless, and just as attacked as all other Americans that day.

Now, the politicians, firemen, police, architects, future building occupants, designers, and bloggers are wrassling like there was no tomorrow.

What's the wrassling for? Respect for the lost. Identitification of our "resolve". Healing. Prestige. A project for our subsequent generations to prove we did not fail to stand back up after a mighty fall. All of the above in a sometimes nauseating combination.

And that's where the whole thing went wrong. The seemingly worst thing we can with those 16 acres is perhaps the best thing: sell cheap to a developer and let him do his own thing. That's the American way. Make him abide by the laws of safety and economics, but not by the laws of politics and criticism. Whatever design gets built there will be symbolic in its own right wether or not it's a pretty building.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 1:11:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ok, I agree wholeheartedly with your last sentence.

This building in its original design by libeskind was almost a vertical garden.

Something seen in scifi cityscapes, where citizens walk through a glass building filled with trees and plant-life.

Then a developer got a hold of it.

What do developers want? Money. Does a park make money? No. So obviously the park goes, and with it the slender spire that really evoked a feeling of the ideal the tower is supposed to represent.

Freedom.

What is more free than nature?

So they keep some hint of that spire, while relating to many other New York icons, but pack the building with too many references. Although the green building aspect was still present through the wind turbines in the structures upper trellis.

Now. Security concerns push Libeskind completely out of the picture. The building gains 12 stories. Loses the sloping top. Steals the structural innovation used in a new asian tower designed by the original towers leading engineer, only doesn't have any of the sophistication, lightness, or awe inspiring beauty that such a symbol of freedom should evoke.

How does a vertical bunker evoke freedom. Don't people hide in bunkers when they are scared? Wasn't the rebuilding supposed to show we aren't scared.

Developers should never be part of a memorial process, they don't take risks, think only about themselves, and while you are chiding childs for his ego lets remember Silversteins ego, large enough to have it's own ego.

Also, look at how the supporting towers have slowly lost all resemblence to the original plan.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:56:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another SOM shitbox - this time cloaked in a pre-digested cliché.

Previous statement from perspective, "...but in some ways that fits in well with this country's behavior and stance toward the rest of the world since that tragic day almost four years ago."

Indeed.

 
At Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:27:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

George Orwell's 1984:

"The Ministry of Truth -- Minitrue, in Newspeak -- was startlingly different from any other object in sight. It was an enormous pyramidal structure of glittering white concrete, soaring up, terrace after terrace, 300 metres into the air. From where Winston stood it was just possible to read, picked out on its white face in elegant lettering, the three slogans of the Party:

WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

The Ministry of Truth contained, it was said, three thousand rooms above ground level, and corresponding ramifications below. Scattered about London there were just three other buildings of similar appearance and size. So completely did they dwarf the surrounding architecture that from the roof of Victory Mansions you could see all four of them simultaneously. They were the homes of the four Ministries between which the entire apparatus of government was divided. The Ministry of Truth, which concerned itself with news, entertainment, education, and the fine arts. The Ministry of Peace, which concerned itself with war. The Ministry of Love, which maintained law and order. And the Ministry of Plenty, which was responsible for economic affairs. Their names, in Newspeak: Minitrue, Minipax, Miniluv, and Miniplenty."

The name of this new tower: Freedom Tower. The shape: elongated pyramid.

 
At Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:37:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

THAT is incredibly depressing. It looks like any other tower you could find in Columbus, OH, Indianapolis, Atlanta, etc. They had the chance for something special and they are just throwing it away.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Details for the Chicago Architectural Club's 2005 Chicago Prize have been posted on CAC's web page and featured in a Chicago Sun-Times article. The competition "challenges entrants to salvage a part of Chicago's urban fabric, the industrial water tank, through creative reuse and preservation." Mayor Daley feels that "These water tanks are part of the visual history of Chicago's skyline", so they should be preserved. Since the competition is a collaboration between the City of Chicago Department of Environment alongside Cultural Affairs, Planning and Development and the CAC, sustainable applications are mentioned as positive responses.

In Chicago, water tanks aren't as ubiquitous as Manhattan, where in places like SoHo they litter the albeit skyline. Rachel Whiteread even paid hommage to these rooftop elements by creating and installing a temporary translucent resin cast of a tank in that fashionable New York neighborhood.

When I think of water tanks, what immediately pops into my mind is the bright red one at the corner of Grand and St. Clair just east of Michigan Avenue (below). While the color and logo are basically advertising for Optimus, it's nevertheless a memorable gesture that is mentioned as one approach to treating water tanks by Sadhu Johnston, the acting Environment Department commissioner, in the Sun-Times article.

Missing image - watertank.jpg

And again our Mayor (almost) gets what he wants*, bringing Thom Mayne into the Chicago fold to chair the competition jury.

*I'm referring to the Mayor toying around with Mayne that Chicago needs to add to its collection of buildings by Pritzker Prize winners (currently Gehry & Koolhaas and soon Piano), during Daley's speech at the prize ceremony a month ago.

(via Archinect)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, June 27, 2005

My weekly page update:
missing image - ingberg1sm.jpg
"Coloured Reflections in Grand-Métis, Quebec, Canada by Hal Ingberg Architecte.

The updated book feature is The New Modern House, by Will Jones.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Malls of America
"Vintage photos of old Shopping Malls of the '60s & '70s."

Eurobad '74
An online "exhibition of Europe's worst interiors of 1974."

PS 1
Photos in the Archinect image gallery of this summer's installation in PS 1's courtyard, by Hernan Diaz Alonso of Xefirotarch.

1 Comments:

At Monday, June 27, 2005 4:05:00 PM, Blogger Adam said...

Hi, I am conducting a survey of Chicago area Bloggers for my Masters dissertation and have selected your Blog from its listing on www.chicagobloggers.com. Your participation in my online survey would be greatly appreciated and would only take around 5 minutes to complete. The survey can be reached at the following address
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?id=102202


Thank you!
Adam

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, June 26, 2005

A few days ago when I was hooked on the new European aerial views at Google Maps, I saw this HUGE development under construction just north of the Postdamer Platz Reconstruction and adjacent to Norman Foster's Reichstag. Looking through an old DOMUSdossier from 1995 on a plethora of architectural competitions in Berlin, I discovered the linear project is Axel Schultes's winning design for the Spreebogen Government Complex. The most notable feature of the project - and what probably gives it its name - is the fact it crosses the Spree River not once but twice, acting like a unifying element in a city long divided. Click on (rotated) aerial view for map link.

Missing image - spreebogen.jpg

4 Comments:

At Monday, June 27, 2005 12:48:00 AM, Blogger Nick Helmholdt said...

If you're interested, I can get you some recent (May this year) pictures of this building. I was just in Berlin and we did a boat tour of the Spree.

 
At Monday, June 27, 2005 2:34:00 PM, Blogger John said...

helms - That would be great. You can either e-mail it to me (link is top right of sidebar) or post some links here if they're online. Thanks.

 
At Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:33:00 AM, Blogger Bryan said...

This may be very well the longest post you have ever made...

(Please don't kick me for saying that.)

 
At Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:18:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Good one.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

The sometimes cute, sometimes eerie, usually strange photos of McCarty PhotoWorks.

Missing image - mccarty.jpg

(via Eyebeam reBlog)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

The eerily dramatic photographs of Todd Hido.

Missing image - *.jpg

Things look strange when you're a stranger...What might be dully familiar or vaguely comforting in your own neighborhood can look desolate, forbidding, strange, if you see it somewhere else, at night, in fog.

:: Luc Sante

2 Comments:

At Sunday, June 26, 2005 10:55:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

Wonderful. Simply Wonderful.

I like this kind of stuff. I almost paid $50 on impulse once at a Z Gallerie for a large photo similar to his stuff.

 
At Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:52:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

love these photos. i've been working on a similiar series to the houses/apartments. thanks for the link.

dan m.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, June 24, 2005

Been busy the last few days, so I'm catching up on things, ready to make up for the lack of posts lately.

:: The biggest news today appears to be the Supreme Court decision that expands the U.S. government's use of eminent domain to encompass economic development. Previously, eminent domain applied to condemnation for public uses, such as highways and railroads. This ruling opens up an avenue for private developments, like a new Pfizer facility, to bully property owners and take their property with the government's backing, in the name of "economic development." This is a bad judgement that will be fraught with problems down the road as courts try to decide if new and "more lucrative" uses are in fact that, or if they are harmful to their context.

:: Making up for the above no-no, the U.S. government voted to not cut public broadcasting's funding by 25%. Hooray!

:: Treehugger features an interview with James Howard Kunstler, author of The Long Emergency (which I'm about ready to start reading) and perhaps the loudest cautionary voice of our impending cheap oil crisis.

:: Future Feeder posts on Virtual Cities and Urban Underground Farming.

:: David Sucher is pissed that Frank Gehry was given an urban design award by the Congress for New Urbanism, while Joseph Clarke thinks it's warranted, using the Disney Concert Hall - like Sucher - as an example.

:: Books of the Moment: Sketch - Plan - Build: World Class Architects Show How It's Done and Deyan Sudjic's The Edifice Complex.

:: The Paul Klee Centre opened Monday. Improvised Schema has the lowdown.

:: And finally, Marcus at gravestmor took bronzein the competition for a National Police Memorial in Canberra, Australia, out of 77 entries. An impressive design that isn't a reinterpretation of Maya Lin's wall in D.C., as many memorials these days are.

2 Comments:

At Saturday, June 25, 2005 8:06:00 PM, Blogger eBohn said...

Funding public broadcasting is a good thing, I'd have to agree. But with Patricia Harrison in line to head the CPB, is this a bittersweet victory?

 
At Saturday, June 25, 2005 9:38:00 PM, Blogger David Sucher said...

Btw, according Stefanos Polyzoides -- a CNU Founder and in a position to speak with authority -- the Award was given specifically for Disney Hall's urban design.

And to doubly clarify, I wouldn't say a word if Gehry had been recognized for _architecture._ He might well deserve it.

But CNU specifically acknowledged him for Disney Hall's _urban design_, which to anyone who has ever walked around it would be bizarre, even pathetic. It's tragic that CNU is associated with such a travesty of a design, one which turns its back on the city on 75% of its frontage. That's no way to catalyze neighborhood development.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Unbeknownst to me until today, Google Maps has a wide array of high-quality satellite/aerial images for cities outside the United States, particularly Europe. So to play around with this addictive site I looked for some Renzo Piano buildings scattered about that continent. Click images for satellite/aerial link and name for project link.

Missing image - piano1.jpg
KPN Telecom Office Tower
Rotterdam, Netherlands
The least visually-striking aerial (it's the slightly tapered box near the center), but you'll see in the satellite link that it's near UN Studio's Erasmus Bridge and Bolles+Wilson's Luxor Theatre, among other contemporary gems.

Missing image - piano2.jpg
Banca Popolare di Lodi Headquarters
Lodi, Italy
A large project centered around the circular auditorium in the middle of the aerial. Great outdoor spaces for the bank's HQ.

Missing image - piano3.jpg
Centre Georges Pompidou
Paris, France
Probably Piano's most famous building. Still.

Missing image - piano4.jpg
Bercy 2 Shopping Center
Paris, France
Also in Paris, but not nearly as well known as the Pompidou.

Missing image - piano5.jpg
Potsdamer Platz Reconstruction
Berlin, Germany
From up here one can't even tell this urban project is covered in terra cotta.

Missing image - piano6.jpg
Auditorium Parco della Musica
Rome, Italy
Definitely the most striking project from the air, and one of my favorites.

Missing image - piano7.jpg
Nola Commercial and Leisure Center
Naples, Italy
Currently under construction on the outskirts of Naples, this project is more landmass than building, sure to be one of his greatest when finished.

9 Comments:

At Wednesday, June 22, 2005 3:15:00 AM, Blogger fix buffalo said...

this is totally awesome stuff...

 
At Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:41:00 AM, Anonymous Rob said...

How do you get to the satellite stuff for Europe? Been looking for it for ages.

 
At Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:25:00 AM, Blogger John said...

rob - The easiest ways are to either type in a place, like "Rome, Italy" and it'll take you there, or from the main page you can pan and zoom to other parts of the globe and then switch to Satellite view. If you're zoomed in far enough you can tell if places have high-def aerials; they're rectangular patches of brown like this.

 
At Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:59:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

Coolness!

I've been to the Bercy project and was pretty disappointed. The manner that the metal exterior meets the ground is very unfinished and it makes the sidewalk a bit of a no-mans-land. The interior is nothing special and has no relation to the exterior. It almost seems like it was a study for the metal exterior wall that they didn't finish the edges.

 
At Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:28:00 PM, Anonymous Eric said...

Yeah, that's cool. According to Google Sightseeing, they "quietly" added the rest of the world just a day or two ago.

I'm sure you can guess, John, which country I visited first. Tokyo's lookin' great, but Kyoto is unfortunately still a low-res fuzz at any meaningful level of zoom. On to Okinawa...

 
At Wednesday, June 22, 2005 4:19:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

Yeah, Google didn't have anything other than North America in the beginning, but they didn't tell anyone they have added other continents.

Anyone ever look at Manhattan? It's hard to see the buildings in Midtown because of all the shadows. But if you look close enough you can see the shadows pointing in three different directions.

I'm off to Germany now (Google Maps really, I can't afford the real thing...)

 
At Monday, June 27, 2005 8:45:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, the building that covers the left part of the "Potsdamer Platz Reconstruction, Berlin, Germany" picture is not by Renzo Piano. It's the Berlin Philharmonie by Hans Scharoun see http://www.galinsky.com/buildings/philharmonie/.

 
At Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:27:00 AM, Anonymous Rob said...

Ah, I've got it...the satellite button wasn't there when I first tried it a few weeks ago. Thanks for the heads up!

 
At Monday, January 23, 2006 11:58:00 AM, Anonymous Interior Design said...

Just a quick aside, as I was surfing the web today I did run across some great links and articles about this:

office interior design

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, June 20, 2005

My weekly page update:
missing image - da1sm.jpg
Tongxian Gatehouse in Beijing, China by Office dA.

The updated book feature is A People's History of the United States, by Howard Zinn.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Arcblue
An architectural photography database (thanks to Damian for the link).

From Louis Sullivan to SOM
An MIT online museum gallery that "examines the significant contributions Boston architects, particularly those from MIT, made towards affecting change in architectural design and practice in Chicago during the late 19th and early 20th centuries."

B.E.L.T.
"Built environment in Layman's Terms"

Recovery Project: Century Building
Recovering artifacts of St. Louis's Century Building previously covered on this page.

(Thanks to Michael for the last two links)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, June 17, 2005

The latest Wallpaper* features a spread on Ponte City, a 54-story apartment building in Johannesburg, South Africa. The cylindrical building is hollow at the core, an amazing site!

Missing image - ponte.jpg

Some further information:
:: 54 Stories

:: The Best View in Town

:: Johannesburg Landmarks

:: Some exterior images

:: Ponte City by Norman Ohler

:: A High-rise Prison?

:: Emporis' page

2 Comments:

At Saturday, June 18, 2005 3:16:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I like it. Too dark on one hand, but what a place to live!

Thanks for pointing me to Wallpapper*.

Did you miss this: http://www.wallpaper.com/design/733 ?
I almost wet myself.

Keep up the good job with your bloggie.

 
At Saturday, June 18, 2005 5:59:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

HI there
We live around the corner from Ponte, which incidentally is over the road from ELLIS PARK, one of the staduims where the 2010 world cup football will be held so there is much reurbanisation planned for that specific area. Check out www.represent.co.za for more information.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, June 16, 2005

With both this week's dose and this week's past dose featuring buildings in Hamburg, Germany, this article at Spiegel Online struck me as a nice coincidence. It covers the city's ambitious reshaping of its harbor area, focusing on the Elbe Philharmonic project by Herzog & De Meuron. The concert hall would be housed in a renovated warehouse and an addition that sits atop the old brick structure.

Missing image - hamburg1.jpg
Elbe Philharmonic

Another interesting design is the "Living Bridge" by local architect Hadi Teherani (who also designed lofts in Falkenried, the area of this week's dose), a residential project that would span five stories in a bridge over the Elbe River.

Missing image - hamburg2.jpg
Living Bridge

These projects are part of what's being called "HafenCity" (harbor city), though city approval is still required for the designs to become a reality. They are unique and striking designs that - even if never built - should inspire cities on how to reuse their industrial waterfronts.

2 Comments:

At Friday, June 17, 2005 10:06:00 PM, Anonymous Murray said...

Thanks for the Herzog & De Meuron update. Can't wait to see that.

 
At Friday, June 24, 2005 12:43:00 AM, Blogger Alejandro Francesco said...

that bridge is almost like a contemporary take on the Ponte Vecchio in Florence.. cool stuff.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

First Frank Gehry was animated for a cameo on The Simpsons. Now seven architects don $1,000 suits in the July issue of Esquire. Aside from Daniel Libeskind, the choice of architects is refreshingly less than obvious. They include: Martin Finio, Richard Gluckman, Matthew Baird, James Corner, Brian Healy, and James Slade.

Missing image - esquire.jpg

Like the picture above - but with faces - the spread combines fashion shots with ethereal sketches that hover about the architects. Too bad they didn't paint them in the air like Picasso.

1 Comments:

At Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:10:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

My guess is that they had to find architects that could fit in the suits. That could be why there aren't the big names.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

A couple blogs I read regularly linked to an article by Steve Sailer called "From Bauhaus to Golf Course: The Rise, Fall, and Revival of the Art of Golf Architecture," a subject of extreme interest to me. Why? A little background.

The events that led up to me going to architecture school and becoming an architect began with a stroll down one of the halls in my high school during sophomore year. Outside the architecture/drafting classroom I saw in a display case a design of a golf course by a student. I can't recall if it was any good in any way, but it was the first instance that got me actually thinking about designing golf courses. At the time I played a lot of golf, so I was excited by the prospect. In the remaining time before graduation I took as many drafting and architecture classes as I could, though I never got to design a golf course in class (I did so on my own a couple times). Regardless I set off to a landscape architecture program in Kansas with the intention of designing golf courses*.

My interest in playing and keeping up with golf has decreased since those days, but I still have a keen interest in golf course design, even though I'm not familiar with courses that have opened in the last ten years. But getting to Sailer's article, it sounds like golf course design - like architecture - is cyclical: periods of "looking forward" are followed by periods of "looking backward", and vice-versa. For example, early American courses like Shinnecock Hills mimicked the original Scottish links, while the mid-20th-century designs that followed favored rational layouts that paralleled the Modernist aesthetic prevalent at the time. Designs of the 70s and 80s tended towards novelty and a break away from tradition, though recent courses seem to favor both traditional American and Scottish types.

Outside of a decent background on American golf course design with plenty of links** and images, Sailer gripes about the lack of recognition of the field as an artform, because "Golf courses are too bourgeois to be hip, too elegant to be camp...Many of the creators, critics, and collectors who have so enriched the arts are male homosexuals, while golf, for whatever reason, has almost no appeal to gay male sensibilities," and that "At a time when art institutions are fixated on celebrating demographic diversity, the golf architecture business remains white...[and] male...Further, many of the classic courses are owned by exclusive clubs accused of racism, sexism, or anti-Semitism." While I can't say I agree with Sailer's reasoning, basically golf is part of the establishment, not something that is critical of the establishment as a lot of art is. Even with the huge influence of Tiger Woods on the demographics of people now playing the game, golf is still seen as a white man's game. But more than that it's a rich white man's game. Sailer quotes a course in Las Vegas that recently cut it's greens fees in half...to $500!

Missing image - golf.jpg
Pine Valley, considered the greatest golf course in the US.

But is golf course design an art? For somebody who tends to see art as many parts interpretation, I think it can be. Most courses don't aspire to art and the ones that do do deserve some recognition and appreciation. Unfortunately any first-hand appreciation is usually only available to a select few.

*For those curious readers wondering what happened, after the required two years of Environmental Design in college, I realized my interests leaned more towards buildings than landscape, so I enrolled in the Architecture program instead of Landscape Architecture.

**Two excellent resources I discovered on Sailer's page are Golf Club Atlas and Caddy Bytes.

1 Comments:

At Wednesday, June 15, 2005 7:47:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Didn't Mark Twain call golf "a good walk spoiled"? Now, I think we can view a landscaped path as art (for proof see japanese gardens) - so, to do the math that makes the art of a golf course good landscape art spoiled. Or something like that.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

KCRW's Design & Architecture (DnA) show today featured some interesting commentary on misguided urban schemes (L.A.'s Grand Avenue and the WTC site) as well as a couple recent expressions on the city, one aural and one visual.

Ry Cooder's latest album, Chavez Ravine, journeys to the mid-20th century and the "political machinations that leveled the Chavez Ravine barrio to lure the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles." Again, Cooder enlists a plethora of talented musicians to present to the world something overlooked.

And Ben Stiller (yep, that Ben Stiller) has just released a book he co-edited, a visual portrayal of the city called Looking at Los Angeles. He says, "From the iconic to the mundane and forgettable, there is a certain unique and singular feeling that is Los Angeles."

Missing image - stiller.jpg
Kevin Cooley, "“CSI"” in MacArthur Park (2001)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

All sorts of goodies this week:
:: It's Bike to Work Week!

:: NeoCon, with coverage at core77.

:: Kerry Skarbakka jumps off the MCA roof today.

:: Art Institute hires architecture curator.

:: Center on Halsted groundbreaking takes place today.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, June 13, 2005

My weekly page update:
missing image - falkenried2sm.jpg
Falkenried Quartier in Hamburg, Germany by Bolles+Wilson.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Planning and its Disconnects
An article by Lynn Becker from the current issue of the Harvard Design Magazine.

DE-tro-IT
"An online extension/open ended media campaign of the exhibition project 'DE-tro-IT', with the global media image of Detroit as topic. The project is part of the Shrinking Cities exhibition in Leipzig, Germany autumn 2005." Part of the bad-architect.network.

Red Feather Development Group
An organization that "educates and empowers American Indian nations to create sustainable solutions to the severe housing crisis within reservation communities." Recently published Building a Straw Bale House.

DavidByrne.com
Homepage of the musician/artist/graphic designer/photographer/etc.

1 Comments:

At Friday, June 24, 2005 12:46:00 AM, Blogger Alejandro Francesco said...

Good call on the David Byrne link. That guy is the man. I'm seeing him play in central park on June 29th, can't fucking wait. His blog is amazing.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, June 12, 2005

In this week's Chicago Reader, Lynn Becker covers the contribution by John Ronan to the Visionary Chicago Architecture book and exhibition now on display (until July 15) at Millennium Park. The local architect proposes reusing the massive, 2.5 million s.f. U.S. Post Office that bridges the Eisenhower Expressway southwest of the Loop. But unlike past proposals that have tried to retrofit residential and office space into the large floor plates, Ronan's is a "municipal mausoleum" that preserves a majority of the existing structure in a suprisingly practical way.

Missing image - ronan1.jpg
Ronan's Mausoleum

Becker's article illuminates the importance of cemeteries as public gathering spaces before the creation of city parks, like Lincoln Park which actually displaced graves further north. Ronan's "urban burial ground" could actually ease the burden on typical plot cemeteries; here they would be stacked 14 stories high. Becker states that "Ronan's proposal confronts a neglected but fundamental issue: how a city deals with its dead," a sentence that reminds me of Italy's "Cities of the Dead", a beautiful description for cemeteries and the like.

Missing image - ronan2.jpg
R