Wednesday, August 31, 2005

In 1996, Las Vegas businessman David Jin dreamed up the idea of "walking out over the Grand Canyon and staring 4,000 feet down into the Colorado River -- while standing on four inches of glass." On January 1, believe it or not, it will become a reality.

Missing image - canyon1.jpg
Image from MRJ Architects

The horseshoe-shaped walkway that juts 70-feet out into the canyon is "part of the Hualapai Tribe's $40 million effort to turn 1,000 acres of reservation land into a tourist destination that will also feature an Indian village and Western-themed town."

Missing image - canyon2.jpg
Image from MRJ Architects

Regardless of the questionable nature of the walkway and the theme park (ideas actually opposed by about half the tribe's elders initially), it is quite a feat of engineering. It is designed, with the help of Lochsa Engineering, to support 72 million pounds, to withstand a magnitude 8.0 earthquake centered 50 miles away, and to withstand winds in excess of 100 mph.

But will people spend $25 to feel their stomachs in their mouths? We won't know until Grand Canyon Resort Corp., the tribal-owned company that is overseeing the project, finds an insurer for the project, probably not an easy task.

(Thanks to Eric M. for the head's up)

7 Comments:

At Thursday, September 01, 2005 2:04:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

Kudos if they can pull it off, but judging from the rendering, they're missing something. I'm guessing there was some artistic license taken.

Pedestrian cantilevers are possible if the guardrail is cleverly used as an incognito truss. But that doesn't appear to be the case here. Glass is being used like never before, but I really doubt it could be used for something this bold.

 
At Saturday, September 03, 2005 6:27:00 PM, Anonymous joey said...

Reminds me of the glass floor in the CNTower. And, will we be able to bungee jump from it?

 
At Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:12:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

$! Yes, change is constant, but the elders were right in contesting this tourist attraction. Any money the tribe MAY get will never be enough to buy back our culture.

 
At Friday, January 13, 2006 9:00:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very funny.An all glass walkway jutting out from a cliff that is rated to support the weight equivalent to 16 fully fuelled and loaded space shuttle launch vehicles.Where is the anti-gravity machine? I researched this farse and discovered that the originators were taking money for advance orders.HA HA HA.

 
At Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:37:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The scenery at Toroweap, part of Grand Canyon NP and directly across the river from the Hualapai Reservation is my choice for a place where one can stand on the edge and drop a rock into the river.

 
At Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:04:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

hi

 
At Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:07:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i think that this is a bit of a strange idea. why would people want to stand over a mile above the canyon floor? anyway, were will they get an insurance policy. i wouldn't go over it, especially not for 25$!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Looks like Ralph Johnson of Perkins + Will is looking to join the ranks of celebrity architects, alongside Daniel Libeskind and Richard Meier with Signature Place in St. Petersburg, Florida. Or is he already there?

Missing image - ralph1.jpg

Like David Childs, Johnson's role as a lead designer at a large corporate firm actually precludes him from being seen like Frank Gehry, Santiago Calatrava, and other "singular voices" of celebrity in contemporary architecture. Though unlike David Childs, Johnson is a very capable designer who produces excellent buildings of different types and scales.

Missing image - ralph2.jpg

Thanks to Jeff S. for the head's up.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Of course, the big news is Hurricane Katrina's havoc on Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, and Louisiana, in particular New Orleans, where 80% of the city is under water.

Missing image - katrina.jpg
Reuters photo

Some related links:
:: Architecture for Humanity is taking donations for rebuilding efforts. I've also added a link to the sidebar for this great organization.

:: Fellow blogger and N.O. resident Jimmy is safe and exiled in Texas.

:: Coverage at Metroblogging New Orleans.

and

:: Some news coverage at Archinect.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

I'm hitting the road for about a week, so this blog will be on hiatus until next Wednesday. Here's some things to entertain/educate y'all in the meantime:
:: Made in the USA. Karim Rashid dons his purple specs as a judge in the soon-to-be-smash hit "reality competition" series on USA Network. I'd say he's sold out, but I think he's already done that. (via Improvised Schema)

:: Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music. Don't know the difference between Ambient House and Ambient Trance? Or don't know what the hell Buttrock Goa or Musique Concrete are? This Flash-based site will teach you everything you need to know. With lots and lots of samples.

:: The State of Affairs: "Perimeter security is ugly and may not keep us safe," "Lockheed Martin Is Hired to Bolster Transit Security in N.Y.," and "Do fast-food chains cluster around schools?"

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

An early and probably unintentional member of Long Island City's popular art scene, the Noguchi Museum opened in 1985 in a factory building converted by the artist. It reopened last year after a 2.5-year renovation by Sage and Coombe Architects that added an education center, cafe & bookstore, made the galleries and garden accessible, and improved the HVAC system in order to keep the museum open year-round.

Missing image - HD13a.jpg
Area 1

"Area 1" is the first space encountered after admission and is architecturally one of the most striking spaces at the museum. The corner light well above is one of the three tips of the triangle that the museum and garden occupy, perhaps accentuating this fact for the visitor inside the space. Not being fully enclosed, Area 1 exhibits a pleasing ambiguity -- between outside/inside, art/architecture -- that is definitely appropriate for Noguchi.

Missing image - HD13b.jpg
Area 9

Above Area 1 are the upper floor galleries called Area 9 & 10, now accessible via a new ramp by the renovation architects. Unlike the area below, the enclosed galleries aren't as rough, opting for wood and plaster over CMU and in-situ concrete.

Missing image - HD13c.jpg
The Garden

If there were only one reason to visit the Noguchi Museum, it would definitely be the garden. Walled off from the two adjacent streets, it is a quiet space of contemplation and repose. In many ways, it is Noguchi's interpretation of a traditional Japanese rock garden. The artist's sculptures take the place of boulders, a la Ryoanji, and the trees become elements within the sea of rocks alongside the art. The changing character of the space across the seasons is what draws people back for multiple visits.

Links:
:: The Noguchi Museum
:: Sage and Coombe Architects
:: Architectural Record article
:: American Masters

Labels:

1 Comments:

At Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:25:00 AM, Anonymous epochedifice said...

I highly recommend this stop for anyone living in NYC or visiting. Discard the fashionable architecture of Manhattan and Architectural Record for a while, and enjoy the simple materials and space intermingled with the art so beautifully. It is a quite space, evoking “In Praise of Shadows” and other subtle orient connections. Noguchi’s work is simple truly captivating while the museum takes a bow to the art, unlike current trends.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Busy weekend for architecture news in the Windy City.
:: Martha Thorne, currently associate curator of architecture at the Art Institute of Chicago, has been named executive director of the Pritzker Architecture Prize. Story at the Sun-Times and Tribune.

:: Frank Gehry buys the "Building formerly known as Inland Steel."

:: Crown Hall "dazzles" before its official reopening this Saturday.

and

:: It might be old news now, but Hello Beautiful's one-hour show devoted to Calatrava's Fordham Spire is now online.

4 Comments:

At Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:45:00 PM, Anonymous redd said...

I think you might have been asked this, but "Why do you think sphires, tappered, and round buildings are the mainstream designs we see time and time again? Are we in the middle of a or starting of a new architectural "period"?

 
At Wednesday, August 24, 2005 2:32:00 AM, Blogger fred said...

I'm sure modern CAD methods have a lot to do with it. Shapes are feasible now which even 15 or 20 years ago could not have been contemplated.

 
At Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:43:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Redd - For a bunch of reasons, including CAD, as bromgrev mentions, advances in structures that enable these designs to happen, a grasp for something beyond a Modern glass box or a Post-modern decorated box, and a reliance in contemporary architecture these days on sculptural form over surface articulation. Even Herzog & de Meuron, known for their silkscreened glass and concrete boxes, have done work recently that moves towards form as the overt design element. I don't know if this is a new "period"...maybe a comma? :)

But I think most high-rise designs fall into flat, non-tapered, square/rectangular buildings, because they're cheaper, easier to build, and better for maximizing area and figuring out rentable/saleable space.

 
At Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:24:00 AM, Blogger Frank said...

From a structural point of view, obscure and asymetrical forms are now easier to analyze with today's computer programs. In the past, an amount of uncertainty would require larger structural members to be used. The increased weight and size could mean it would not be feasible to build.

But don't forget, gravity, wind, and earthquakes still exist.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, August 22, 2005

My weekly page update:
missing image - avanti2sm.jpg
Isokon Flats in London, England by Avanti Architects.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
"The Breaking Point"
Peter Maass's article on Peak Oil in The New York Times (non-subscription version available at V&V).

Delusion and the Media
Kunstler's commentary on Maass's article, and others.

Eye Candy
"A pic a week from [the] weekly e-zine: eye candy"

Freakonomics
Blog by the authors of the bestselling book of the same name.

Preservation Directory
"Online resource for historic preservation, building restoration and cultural resource management in the United States & Canada."

4 Comments:

At Monday, August 22, 2005 8:00:00 PM, Anonymous Lil'G said...

J - Thanks (sort of) for the Peter Maass article...very scary stuff. You would think that maybe our government (and others) might start thinking seriously about campaigning for and enforcing less consumption. But then again that wouldn't be the American way...con$ume, con$ume, con$ume...

 
At Tuesday, August 23, 2005 1:52:00 AM, Blogger Safety Neal said...

Trackback:

Over at the Daily Dose of Architecture, I saw a link to an article titled The Breaking Point by Peter Maass in the August 21, 2005 edition of the New York Times.

 
At Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:27:00 AM, Anonymous marcus said...

Very nice article on the restoration of the Isokan Flats. I was not familiar with this building but I sure do like the idea of living in a building with its own resident run, rooftop bar...

 
At Tuesday, August 23, 2005 5:22:00 AM, Blogger fred said...

I'd lost track of progrees on the Isokon, But it looks like the restoration went very well. It's a damn shame more of Britain's few architectural icons from the 30s don't get the same respect. But what happened to the two large trees in the newly-restored picture?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, August 21, 2005

Lynn Becker has the lowdown on AIA Chicago's Young Architect's Forum's competition for a recycling receptacle in Chicago. I strolled over to Daley Plaza after work to check out the 25 finalists. My favorite:

Missing image - YAF.jpg

Sure, it's goofy and looks like something out of a Pixar film, but it also integrates itself with the existing trash cans (some around the Loop and other parts of the city are different - nicer - but this scheme could be modified to fit onto those, too) and proposes reusing newspapers, over just recycling, their bundled masses poking from the green orb for easy grabbing. These are a couple good ideas that set it apart from the other schemes, ones that tended to be from the ground up and lacking in a sense of humor.

12 Comments:

At Sunday, August 21, 2005 8:17:00 PM, Blogger eBohn said...

John, was it here on your site that I first read about this sort of recycling program in another city? The adaptation to the trash can, as I recall, resembled something like a tool belt with compartments for PET bottles, papers, etc. Good idea for recycling, and an aid to those hardworking bottle and can collectors!

 
At Monday, August 22, 2005 3:31:00 AM, Anonymous Divya Rao said...

Hmmmmmm... quite funky. As a student of architecture I feel it has added a new dimension to recycled receptacle. Good show.. take care.

 
At Monday, August 22, 2005 4:13:00 AM, Blogger fred said...

Interesting idea, although I'm not sure how many people will want to roll up their newspapers to fit them into the receptacle. Also, how do potential re-users see which papers are 'available'?

 
At Monday, August 22, 2005 4:51:00 AM, Anonymous Megs said...

The idea is wonderful, and the whimsy adds a touch of humor to the bleh world of recycling. I think the public would respond well to something like this. I could see the little orbs getting nicknames like the bean did...

 
At Monday, August 22, 2005 10:24:00 AM, Blogger DR said...

Speaking as a newspaper addict, I would love to see those bins adopted. I don't know how many times I've wanted a newspaper and couldn't find one or -- and this is the really important bit -- tried to leave my newspaper where someone else could take it only to have some illiterate slob with a cleaning fetish throw it away seconds later.

 
At Monday, August 22, 2005 12:16:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cool idea but it looks tacky, like Cows on Parade. The better design is the 2nd pic on Lynn Becker's site.

 
At Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:23:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I used to live in the Mid-west and would like to know how the newspaper recepticle performs during a spring storm. I do think they are useful and I enjoy the color.

 
At Wednesday, August 24, 2005 2:59:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is done informally by riders getting off Metro-North railroad in Grand Central here in NYC; its nice to see an attempt to formalize it.

I see two problems - rain and cleaning. A couple of pieces of gum and it might not look so good.

 
At Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:12:00 AM, Blogger jeanluc said...

Nice ones. What does happen with the newspapers when it's raining asnd very windy?

 
At Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:55:00 PM, Blogger fueledbycoffee said...

Disclosure: I am one of the competitors that did not place, I am not sour grapes-- the winners have merits in aesthetics and concept, but I have to voice my displeasure in the functionality. Both concepts don't seem to take any fucntional considerations into making neighborhood recycling an integral part of Chicago life. They come across more as boutique-one-offs that would look interesting, but would never get placed in _every_ neighborhood, on _every_ corner.

 
At Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:43:00 AM, Blogger 2012architecten said...

Geat idea....for recycling in architecture take a look at www.recyclicity.net cick 'english' and 'exampledesigns'

A dutch pilotversion but the infrastructure is bilangual so check it out.

 
At Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:38:00 AM, Blogger John said...

I'm guessing that when it rains the newspapers aren't reused, but recycled, though I don't know at what point they're put into the blue bags...when Streets and San comes around?

Craig - Back when I first posted about the competition in June, I remarked on the lofty ambition of the undertaking, asking entrants to "re-investigate the process of recycling in its entirety, from the material manufacturing process to the consumption choices made by individuals to the existing recycling infrastructure and its role in the collection process."

That seemed a lot to ask for a six-week duration, and I think the competitors reacted accordingly, creating kiosks that articulate the different containers for the various recylcables (paper, plastic, alum, glass) via form, color, size, etc. Rethinking the process isn't apparent, at least in the finalists. I'd be curious to see your entry. Will it be up on your blog soon?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, August 19, 2005

Brian at Gapers Block is more than correct when he points out that Chicago's subways stations are in need of some beautification, especially as a means to increase ridership. Of course we're also talking about the CTA, an organization riddled with money problems as they strive to first, upgrade one of its lines to handle unprecedented ridership and second, replace all of its front- and back-facing cars with ones that have bench seats perpendicular to the line of travel to allow for more standing room, a la New York City. Anyways, let's take a look at a couple of Metro Arts and Architecture's beauties and Chicago.

Moscow:

Missing image - cta1.jpg

Munich:

Missing image - cta2.jpg

Chicago:

Missing image - cta3.jpg

No, the GG doesn't stand for Good God! For frame of reference, the Chicago station shown is one of the recent overhauls (click here for its previous state). Well, at least we have the "L".

4 Comments:

At Saturday, August 20, 2005 1:21:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Moscow ones also have portraits of Stalin. Who do we put up? Both Daley's? Bush?

 
At Saturday, August 20, 2005 1:25:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

In Europe, Chicago is known for it's gangsters, so Capone would be a good choice. Interesting juxtaposition between the Daleys' mugs.

Here in Montreal, everyone thinks it's breezy there due to it's Windy City nickname. I'm getting tired of explaining that one.

I guess it's like Philadelphia's reputation for brotherly love combined with the movie of the same name.

Montreal's stations are primarily brutalist in nature, but the touch of design is a nice change from bland Chicago stations. The rubber tires are a welcome difference for the ears.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Metro#Design

 
At Wednesday, August 24, 2005 7:02:00 PM, Anonymous jeff said...

Is that comparison really fair? I'm pretty sure that is the most lavish station in Moscow, and you have compared it to the more pedestrian of Chicago rennovations just to make a point. Maybe what you show is the norm in Munich. And you've passed up a rare opportunity to pick on NYC to the advantage of our fair city.

I'd be all for digging up the existing stations for a complete overhaul with dramatic new spaces, but we all know that's not happening.

 
At Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:02:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Jeff - Sure, the rest of the Moscow stations probably aren't as nice as this one, but the same can be said about the Chicago station here. Granted that the Loop stations have a bit more breathing room with the center platform, and the Roosevelt red line stop has that nice transfer tunnel to the "L", but they're all the same design: white, blue, red tile with painted barrel vault and some perforated panels. A welcome improvement over the previous state, but nothing that comes close to other cities. And I don't think the CTA will ever fund such an operation, enlarging and "dramatizing" the undergound spaces, but it does show where the focus was to begin with: above ground. The "L" stations aren't architectural wonders either, but they don't need to be, since it's all about the ride. NYC doesn't have (much of) that luxury, though I'd rate their underground stations just above Chicago, for amenities (newstands right next to the tracks!), better tile, more generous spaces, better bences, the little details not the grand gestures.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Yesterday the final design for downtown Kansas City's Sprint Center Arena was unveiled, "a glistening jewel in the revitalization of downtown...[that represents] Kansas City's honesty, clarity, vision and the Midwestern values we all cherish." The "we" refers either to Kansas Citians in general or the Downtown Arena Design Team, made up of HOK Sport+Venue+Event, Ellerbe Becket and 360 Architecture.

Missing image - kc1.jpg

The design is envisioned as an "arena in the park with fountains and outdoor gathering space," with these elements visible across the street from the arena. A connected piece in the arena's foreground is the National Association of Basketball Coaches'’ College Basketball Experience. Together these three elements (arena, covered open space, NABC) attempt to define the entry for the Sprint Arena. It's difficult to ascertain, but it appears the outdoor space across the street actually sits atop a structure, perhaps a parking garage. Ideally the "arena in the park" would not be separated from the park by a street or a one- to two-level grade change. But people gotta park their cars and buses, right?

This view also shows the immense opportunity for a Sprint logo to land upon the smooth and empty white roof of the arena. The airport can even reroute planes over the arena for even more corporate exposure!

Missing image - kc2.jpg

The biggest criticism of the design has been the sharp turn-of-face from the previous design towards an Allianz-esque exterior design. The simpler, and probably cheaper, design is actually an improvement over the fussy and flashy early design, though the articulation and detailing of this wall is going to make or break the arena's appearance. Renderings of the NABC component, though, already make that piece look dated, like it's a hold over from the 1960s.

Missing image - kc3.jpg

Although floor plans aren't available, it appears that the concourse will be pushed to the exterior, along the "jewel-like" glass wall. This should help to activate the facade, at least on game days, and help achieve the views in and out of the arena that the designers desire. This rendering shows a pretty run-of-the-mill circulation space, jazzed up by random strip lighting and populated by the same old RPC people in just about every interior rendering these days.

Ultimately, Kansas City is a city in need of some revitalization. Is an arena the means to this? I don't think so. In my book, they're like casinos: seen as that "magic solution" by local governments for their taxes, jobs, and activity, but when done they actually drain vitality from the city, either by keeping people indoors (casinos) or being used for only a few days or weeks a year (sports stadia). But it looks like it's past the time to criticize the validity of the development. We can only hope that other public developments follow in its footsteps.

(Thanks to Eric M. for the heads up)

7 Comments:

At Friday, August 19, 2005 1:29:00 PM, Anonymous Danny S. 360 Architecture said...

John,

Thanks for featuring the KC Sprint Arena on your website. It has been a great task to revitalize downtown Kansas City and we have needed a new sports venue for some time. The design team has been hard at work for the past year and have done an amazing job.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 1:31:00 PM, Blogger John said...

It IS good to see something like this in a downtown rather than the 'burbs, I will admit. Chicago is blessed with a few.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 1:50:00 PM, Anonymous Danny S. said...

Yes, I've had the pleasure of seeing them a couple times this year.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 2:48:00 PM, Blogger JOhn said...

HOuston's new ballpark (enron now minute maid) came about just after the revitalization/rediscovery of houston's central business district. It ripened for residential use in the late middle 90s. Now the Rockets have a new arena down there too since a church took over their old home.

I haven't spent much time back in HOuston since 2000, but I understand downtown to still be healthy.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 4:36:00 PM, Anonymous Danny S. said...

Well, we are hoping that this will give KC a big shot in the arm and bring life to our otherwise, barren downtown area. The new entertainment district that is going up alongside the arena and the new H&R Bloch headquarters (which will also house a theatre) will boost more people to move downtown. There has been a big push to renovate alot of our vacant buildings into residential properties now.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 10:47:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

Little known, and probably arguable, is how KC has been trying hard for a couple of years now to upstage Omaha for regional conventions.

After Omaha's Qwest Center opened, Omaha became the regional draw. KC has more money to spend than Omaha, as is apparent in the new Sprint Center.

Their Convention Center and new Sprint Arena are downtown, as is Omaha's Qwest Center, but Omaha has its airport only 3 miles away. Ha, take that KC.

 
At Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:15:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

LOL, it may only be 3 miles away, but just how many airlines fly to Omaha anyway? And for the ones that do, I bet it's just near impossible for anyone in the country to get a direct flight there. So Ha, take that O!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, August 18, 2005

Remember this project?

Missing image - galicia1.jpg

Yep, the City of Culture of Galicia in Santiago de Compostela, Spain by Peter Eisenman.

Missing image - galicia2.jpg

Well, it looks like it's under construction.

Missing image - galicia3.jpg

After the lukewarm reception of his Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, this huge landform just may be the architect's legacy. Or it may end up like the Wexner Center (undergoing a $15 million renovation only 15 years after completion) or the Columbus Convention Center (ugly). My bet's riding on the legacy.

Images found at arqa.com, via Archinect.

6 Comments:

At Friday, August 19, 2005 4:58:00 AM, Anonymous Hector Corcin said...

I think it can be great... I hope to see it finished soon :)

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 7:26:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Firstly: great blog!, I have set it as my homepage. Daily updates, excellent.

And: Do you know of anywhere that has larger images of this project.

Cheers. JJ (Australian supporter)

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 9:45:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Don't know where one can find larger images. I'll keep my eyes open, though, and post some info as I find it.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 10:54:00 AM, Blogger fred said...

I hope it'll be legacy ... the memorial was unimpressive - not oppressive, as we like our memorials in Germany.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 11:02:00 AM, Blogger brandon said...

Is that what "construction" looks like? What a joke. What a waste of time, money and resources! Eisenman buildings are not unlike the Bush administration warmongering. No regard for the community at large or the peoples lives it will effect or the cost it will take to perform such unrealistic, monumental tasks.... and as you stated John, will both always be asking for more money to pull it off. It is all about immediate gratification and head swelling egoism.

 
At Friday, August 19, 2005 3:20:00 PM, Anonymous Lil' G said...

Well Eisenman is really going for it here. I have never been too impressed with his work, having the opportunity to see in person a few of his buildings. MAybe this time he has learned from his past mistakes, but somehow I think he has not. My bet is that this will be a disaster.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Even though I consult Galinsky just about every time I take a trip and have included it in my sidebar since the beginning of this blog, I've never noticed the Travel Packs.
Galinsky travel packs are condensed versions of the galinsky building pages for a particular area, collected together in an easily printable pdf format with accompanying map, for use when traveling. Currently we offer travel packs for Paris, New York, London, Japan and Switzerland.
The PDF files enable the traveler to print out the sheets (usually about twenty per city/country) and carry them along. Handy maps, directions and images make finding the buildings a breeze.

Missing image - galinsky.jpg

Not to criticize them, but from my standpoint, most of the buildings are a bit obvious and a number of them can be found pretty easily with other means. For travelers who have less familiarity with Modern architecture but a strong curiosity and willingness to visit canonical buildings, they're perfect. But they make me think a guide to the more obscure, the more contemporary architectural sites around the globe would be just as interesting. Maybe something between the Galinsky Travel Pack and Atelier Bow-Wow's Made in Tokyo/Pet Architecture Guide Book.

Sounds like fun to me, so I'll put one together for New York City, a place I've visited enough to see places of unique interest, while knowing where they actually are and how to get there. It'll feature some or all of the NYC/Manhattan weekly doses but also much more. Stay tuned.

*And by Great Idea I mean Galinsky's, not mine. I'm just borrowing the idea.

3 Comments:

At Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:53:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Better late than never :))

 
At Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:44:00 PM, Anonymous marcus said...

I think Galinsky is great however agree that at times it lacks a bit of depth. The Japan section is a good case in point - the obvious buildings in Tokyo then a whole lot of Ando buildings.

But they do offer contributions - and they pay for those published - so why not add your places there? I am hoping to add a few to the Japan section when I return.

Or, hang on. This is a better idea:

Start up a wikitravel-esque site catering to architecture-geek travellers. It could be updated by anyone but would have to ben moderated for quality etc. Could be fun...

 
At Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:16:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Marcus - Good suggestions.

Again it appears I haven't dug deep into Galinsky. I had no idea they pay for contributions.

I'll look into the Wikitravel. The whole wiki thing sounds cool, though I've yet to break the ice on it beyond reading wikipedia occasionally.

One thing I like about the Galinsky guide is that it's formatted to be printed and hauled around. One could probably do two, or even four, per sheet so they can be clipped down to card size. Regardless, it looks like I should do some research on the possiblities before draining my life of even more free time.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

In its news on The Chicago Athaneum's 2005 American Architecture Awards, Artdaily.com is both overly generous - "The American Architecture Awards has quickly become the nation's most prestigious awards program for new commercial, institutional and residential design" - and slightly mistaken - "[the awards] draw significant international attention to new buildings and planning projects being built and designed in the U.S." Though not as prestigious as the AIA Awards (that's my opinion, but how does one rate which or what is the most prestigious award?) - the "Triple A" is nevertheless an important award that draws attention to buildings and projects with a now rather tenuous relationship to American architecture overall.

33 projects received awards, exhibiting the following traits (with some overlap):
::7 are located overseas
::4 are by foreign architects
::5 are on the West coast
::9 are on the East coast
::11 are in-between
So even though the Athaneum says the Awards are "dedicated to the recognition of excellence in architecture in the United States," I hope the inclusion of foreign projects and architects isn't due to a shortage of quality in the submitted American projects. Outside of this little gripe, though, it's refreshing to see a majority of the awarded projects in the U.S. fall between the two coasts.

A handful of highlights:

Missing image - AAAporter.jpg
The Porter House by SHoP, also featured on my weekly page

Missing image - AAArosary.jpg
Holy Rosary Complex by Trahan Architects, also featured on my weekly page

Missing image - AAA222.jpg
222 Residence by Elliott + Associates

Missing image - AAAbelvedere.jpg
Belvedere Gardens by SMBW Architects, featured at Architecture Magazine

Missing image - AAApitt.jpg
Children's Museum of Pittsburgh by Koning Eizenberg, featured at Metropolis (PDF link in new window)

(via Archinect and AIArchitect)

2 Comments:

At Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:31:00 AM, Anonymous Lil'G said...

Every time I see the Holy Rosary Complex project I melt. It is such a beautiful project. The execution and craftsmanship of the work is simply amazing considering the todays lackluster builders. MAybe it's time for a road trip!

 
At Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:27:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Vroom, Vroom!
There's a lot of cool stuff down Louisiana way.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

"As public broadcasting goes, so does Esquire -- to the far Right. Please cancel my subscription."
This disgruntled reader was referring to this month's issue of the men's magazine that featured Donald Rumsfeld as one of ten "inspiring profiles of extraordinary lives." If not for the fact that my subscription is a gift that will be expiring shortly, I'd be apt to join him (her?) after reading the September issue's article on the rebuilding efforts at ground zero by Scott Raab.

This piece is the "first in a years-long series of articles by Raab on the Freedom Tower's construction" (my italics) and is titled "The Foundation."* (Can you just guess what the next article will be called?) This above quote from the contributor page pretty much signals (for me) the direction that Raab is heading, as he focuses on the construction of Freedom Tower: 1. He will not be critical of the tower's design, and 2. He will focus on the players (contractors, construction workers, architects, engineers, clients, etc) that will make it happen. Had I read the contributor page first I may have skipped the article. Instead I dove right into all eleven pages.

From the beginning Raab is siding himself with the working man, the men that built the Twin Towers and the men that will build Freedom Tower (never a doubt in his mind that it will be built). About half the article is devoted to these construction workers and the contractor hired for the job, Tishman Construction. The rest paints pretty pictures of Larry Silverstein and David Childs and derides Daniel Libeskind for, well, being Daniel Libeskind. Without ever saying a bad word about Freedom Tower's current design, Raab attacks Libeskind's winning masterplan as an "utter botch" with a "cockamamie tower." This opining is fine, if it's tempered by opinions and criticism about other WTC designs, developments, players, but it's not. Most everything else (up to the end, which I'll get to) is "reporting" that looks favorably upon those presented, and in this light the comments about Libeskind's design fit right in.

Much like the Republican party's ability to impress both rich people and the working class (previously a group that sided with Democrats) these days, Raab dotes on both, without stepping on either's toes or pitting one against the other. He summarizes this first article by saying "We build buildings. That's what this is about." And of course, it takes both money and a work force to do that. But obviously Raab likes the former, also saying in his conclusion that "...freedom without money is a dirt sandwich," and "we work to make the things that make us human -- love and children, money and art." Whatever you say, Mr. Raab.

*This article is only available online to paid subscribers. If you'd like the text, please e-mail me and I'll forward it to you.

2 Comments:

At Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:49:00 PM, Blogger Jake F said...

I think you are confusing a puff piece with right-wing opinion. You don't like puff pieces, and you don't like right-wing opinions, and you're complaining about both at the same time. I think you're conflating the two.

First, why would you expect a magazine like Esquire to write serious articles about architecture? There are other periodicals offering serious criticism. Criticizing Esquire for not containing serious criticism is like criticizing Hard Copy for not focusing on important issues. Obviously, you are an intellectual and have higher standards. But I imagine Esquire's audience is mostly non-intellectual, and so they aren't going to carry too many seriously thought-provoking pieces about arcane topics like architecture criticism.

Second, do you expect that mainstream magazines will honor only Democrats and never honor Republicans? This is implied by your frustration that Esquire would include a complimentary piece about Donald Rumsfeld. I wouldn't conclude that Newsweek was left-wing even though it recently included a piece that was very critical of Karl Rove. Often I think when mainstream media is accused of bias from people on the left and right, the accusations say more about the critic than the criticized. Right-wingers often find lefties distasteful and out of the realm of acceptable discourse, and vice-versa.

Also, you state that the working class used to vote Democrat and now votes Republican, and that the Republican Party appeals to both the rich and the poor. This would imply that the Democratic Party is the party of the middle class. I don't think that's quite true.

The relationship between income and voting Republican may not be as strong as it once was, but poorer people are still more likely to vote Democrat than Republican.

 
At Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:58:00 PM, Blogger John said...

jake f - Thanks for your intelligent comment. I must be expecting too much from a magazine that is slowly revealing the "sexiest woman alive" one body part at a time. I think part of my problem, though not mentioned in my post, is that for people not following the rebuilding (perhaps a heck of a lot of people), this might be all they know. And what are they getting? Definitely not fair and even coverage. Instead they get a piece that praises people who may be leading New York into the wrong physical response at ground zero. A money-hungry developer, his architect, and the people that actually build their designs.

As far as my comments about Republican/Democrat, my take on the current situation is that the Democratic party is losing voters becuase they are losing what defined them as a party. Be it money for poor people, social programs, decreased military spending. It seems like the Democratic party is Republican-lite with Democrats giving in to corporate and military spending as much as Republicans, the party usually associated with that. Perhaps the country is more Right in general, more conservative. If so, 9/11, and the government's policies and actions since, played a big part in that. But that's not mentioned in the article. Instead we're told that money is good and these guys know what to do with it.

But I guess Esquire has as much right to express something conservative as I do to express something liberal. But are Esquire's seemingly repeated actions (this article and Rumsfeld's that pissed that guy off) part of a general trend in the media towards the Right? Could be.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Some links I've added to the sidebar:
:: World Architecture News (under news)

:: AIA Journal (under online journals)

:: BLDGBLOG (under blogs::architecture)

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, August 16, 2005 5:21:00 PM, Anonymous Rob said...

I'm liking the look of bldg.blog...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, August 15, 2005