Friday, June 23, 2006

Missing image - ornaments.jpg

Posts will resume around the 4th of July.

Update 07.03: Thanks for all the wonderful comments!

The wedding went off better than I ever could have expected. The photo below is by our friend Frank, who also has a great shot of the tree Karen and I are getting married under, in the courtyard of the Smart Museum on the University of Chicago campus.

Missing image - wedding1.jpg

And here's a cool shot of Karen and her Dad walking down the aisle, by another friend, Don.

Missing image - wedding2.jpg

27 Comments:

At Friday, June 23, 2006 4:49:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Congratulations! All the best to you and yours.

 
At Friday, June 23, 2006 7:08:00 PM, Anonymous Cole said...

Congratulations!!!!

 
At Friday, June 23, 2006 8:31:00 PM, Blogger Devyn said...

John, Congrats and best wishes!

 
At Friday, June 23, 2006 9:35:00 PM, Blogger pdr said...

Congrats!!! Have fun on your honeymoon.

 
At Friday, June 23, 2006 9:52:00 PM, Anonymous Michael Blowhard said...

Congrats! Cute photo too.

 
At Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:57:00 AM, Blogger Bryan said...

Here's to a long and great marriage!

 
At Saturday, June 24, 2006 1:59:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Congrats and best wishes to both of you.

 
At Saturday, June 24, 2006 4:29:00 PM, Blogger the silent observer said...

Congrats indeed!

 
At Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:01:00 PM, Anonymous marcus said...

Nice one!

Congratulations and have a great day, honeymoon, life!

 
At Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:29:00 PM, Anonymous lynn Becker said...

Congratulations, and warmest wishes for a great life together

 
At Sunday, June 25, 2006 8:19:00 AM, Blogger laura said...

as a loyal reader, that makes me happy. have fun!

 
At Sunday, June 25, 2006 2:57:00 PM, Blogger jimmy said...

Congratulations! Enjoy a long and happy life together!

 
At Sunday, June 25, 2006 5:41:00 PM, Blogger paul bowman said...

Congratulations! : )

 
At Monday, June 26, 2006 9:19:00 AM, Blogger Stan said...

Congratulations!

 
At Monday, June 26, 2006 1:31:00 PM, Blogger OF said...

Congratulations, John!

 
At Monday, June 26, 2006 4:20:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Congratulations! May it be filled w/ structural integrity!

 
At Monday, June 26, 2006 10:28:00 PM, Blogger Geoff Manaugh said...

Good luck - and congrats - don't drop the ring -

 
At Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:38:00 AM, Blogger Marie* said...

Congratulations!!!

 
At Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:03:00 PM, Anonymous Aaron said...

congratulations k & j from
san francisco!

 
At Friday, June 30, 2006 4:46:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Congratulations!

 
At Friday, June 30, 2006 10:34:00 AM, Blogger Mattias said...

Congrats from Sweden

 
At Friday, June 30, 2006 4:32:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Congratulations, You have to dose at least one picture.

 
At Sunday, July 02, 2006 10:58:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

Congrats again, this time virtually.

It was a great ceremony. The most contemporary one I've been to. Quite fitting of both of you. It was a great time, and we wish you much happiness together in the future. Hope to have the pics up soon.

 
At Friday, July 07, 2006 3:39:00 AM, Blogger Helen Parr said...

Congratulations!
What a nice place!

 
At Friday, July 07, 2006 4:31:00 AM, Blogger Ignacio said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At Friday, July 07, 2006 4:32:00 AM, Blogger Ignacio said...

Lots of broken hearts around, I guess.... ;-)))

Congratulations!!!

 
At Saturday, July 08, 2006 1:11:00 AM, Blogger yamani said...

fabulous! congrats!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Found this image over at Chicagoist, showing Chicago with buildings now under construction or proposed inserted into the city's skyline. Many more images and views are in the Chicago Model Thread at SkyscraperCity.

Missing image - skyline1.jpg

Makes me think that this view won't ever really happen, because even if the proposed buildings are built, there'll probably be more towers under construction with their tower cranes dotting the skyline. Especially in times of progress, the city is never complete, it's always evolving.

1 Comments:

At Saturday, July 08, 2006 1:38:00 PM, Anonymous ludwig said...

John there is and exhibition in London at the moment dealing with the possible skylines on this city. check it out: http://www.airspaceweb.com/pano.php

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

A new plan for the WTC Memorial has been unveiled, according to The New York Times. This plan is the first of probably many rounds of value engineering, in this case spurred by a cost estimate of approximately $1 billion for the memorial. This design comes in at about half that, though Tropolism points out the twisted arithmetic.

One of the biggest changes to the design is technically one of the smallest. Confused? Take a look at these images:

Missing image - WTCmemorial1.jpg
L-R: Before and After

The only apparent change is that the floating handrail has become a solid cap for the parapet wall overlooking the waterfalls and voids below. But if we take a closer look, we see the function of this cap:

Missing image - WTCmemorial2.jpg

Yes, now the names of the dead that were previously etched into the walls below grade, adjacent to the waterfalls, are inscribed into this continuous railing atop the parapet wall. To me this does a few (not good) things: 1. It diminishes the role of the subterranean spaces to a visitor's center, galleries, and places for respite; 2. It diminishes the meaning of presenting the names of the dead via a "two birds with one stone" gesture; and 3. It makes the names an oversight for many visitors who will go to the edge to lean over and look at the waterfalls below (note how they didn't even change the woman in the rendering to reflect the functional change of this piece; she's not looking at the names, but the water below).

Driven mainly by construction exec. Frank Sciame, the full report on the redesign is available in PDF form on LMDC's web page.

8 Comments:

At Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:30:00 PM, Blogger jimmy said...

ah, but they did change the rendering...

Maybe the new handrail is some sort of heating device, as it has apparently eliminated her need for a jacket.

They went to the trouble to smudge out an irrelevent element, but they couldn't be bothered to insert a more appropriate figure? Come on...at least make the effort to pretend this is a design improvement.

 
At Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:48:00 AM, Blogger John said...

I didn't notice that. And looking at the close-up even closer, they did a pretty bad job of it.

 
At Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:41:00 PM, Anonymous arkhitekton said...

The fact that now the victim names are effectively at a typical viewer's groin height (if the figure in the image is to scale) is disrespectful and a poor outcome of "value engineeering".

Value Engineeering (or Value Management as it is called here in Australia) is just a euphemism for cost cutting with minimal consideration of design concept. Why not call a spade a spade?

Although the budget is hard to comprehend, I agree with Tropolism that the WTC Memorial has gone from "thrilling to tame".

 
At Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:28:00 AM, Blogger the silent observer said...

is it just me, or does the whole point of the memorial seem to be escaping the grasp of everyone concerned, including the original designers? I mean, if this is one of the solutions they have towards saving the budget, then i fear what else has been value engineered. Let's face it...now, it seems more like a really, really big coin fountain.

 
At Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:08:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

it is a pity.

they should at the very least have made the entire parapet put of the same metal (?) material so the names would look like they are part of a wall and not just a railing. a sort of functional version of maya lin. still a bit stupid but better than engraving a hand rail with the names of the dead...

in the rendering it looks like one of those forgettable descriptions they put at viewing platforms describing what you are looking at in the distance...

 
At Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:31:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good point, anon. If the material is wood, the names will fade away w/ use.
Even in metal, the names will get scratched up.

This is a very disrespectful idea mixing something sacred with something functional.

It tells you how poor the designers are.

 
At Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:42:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sure the victims and there families will be very happy with the fucking value engineering.

Example:

Hey man, can you move a little bit so I can see the name of my dead father?

Pathetic.

 
At Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:32:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i just hope by 'designers' you mean the LMDC, Sciame, Pataki, and Bloomberg....they are the ones responsible for this debacle.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Who knew?

Missing image - kamin-chemist.jpg

Just kidding. Actually, it's B.Kamins Chemist, as in Ben Kamins. Looks like Blair Kamin doesn't lead a double life as a skin-care guru after all.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, June 19, 2006

My weekly page update:
missing image - seewurfel4sm.jpg
Seewurfel in Zurich, Switzerland by Camenzid Evolution.

The updated book feature is The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, by Edward R. Tufte.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Lift, the London International Festival of Theatre
"a progressive international theatre festival engaging audiences and participants with the work of international and UK artists and which raises consciousness of contemporary issues relevant to our daily lives. Lift is a biennial festival supported with a series of year-round trailblazing events," its latest and current one being The Lift New Parliament, "a portable and transportable structure with a programme of events and activities curated by an international team of artists and producers who will be engaging with local communities on the issues that matter to us all in the 21st century."

Portland Art and Portland Architecture
Two great resources on everybody's favorite progressive West Coast city.

Blair Kamin visits Minneapolis and writes about three new buildings by Jean Nouvel, Cesar Pelli, and Michael Graves.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, June 18, 2006

It was quite a shock to see Mini Cooper partnered with Arcosanti in an insert advertisement in this month's Dwell Magazine.

Missing image - miniarcosanti.jpg

Part of Mini's "Let's visit five wonders of the modern world" campaign (the other four being The Chinati Foundation in Marfa, Texas; Santiago Calatrava bridge in Redding, California; The Farnsworth House by Mies van der Rohe in Plano, Illinois; and Frank Lloyd Wright's Fallingwater in Mill Run, Pennsylvania), the back of the ad asserts that the Mini uses the same design principles as Soleri and Arcosanti, specifically conservation of space and fuel. While it may be true that the Mini is designed with these considerations in mind, it's a far cry from the way those concepts work and inform Arcosanti (see an article I wrote for TENbyTEN for background on the place). Same words, different principles.

What I find hard to believe is that Paolo Soleri would endorse such a thing as an automobile, even though he located his pedestrian-only laboratory of Arcosanti in an area only reachable by car, a fact not lost on Mini who mention that "those desert highways along the way are a veritable motoring paradise."

So Mini appears to be twisting the main concepts of Arcosanti towards its end. It makes me wonder how the other four relate to Mini Cooper...

1 Comments:

At Saturday, July 08, 2006 4:24:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yup. My eyes damn near popped clean out of my head when I saw that ad; Arcosanti proposes to eliminate cars, that's much of the point, and now it's being used to sell them?!? The mind boggles. Admittedly, I have a bit of a soft spot for the Mini -- but still, this is like the Dalai Lama advertising a line of handguns. Utterly inconceivable.

I'm certain that Paolo or the Foundation couldn't possibly have authorized that... I'm going to have to ask them, next time I make it out there.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, June 16, 2006

Some Friday fun for ya with Bateman365's animated video for Yo La Tengo's cover of "Tighten Up" by Archie Bell & the Drells. It's a cut from Yo La Tengo is Murdering the Classics.

Missing image - ylt-tighten.jpg

Everybody's favorite Hoboken, New Jersey-based band also has a cut from their upcoming album posted on their web page. That album goes by the bit less self-deprecating title of I Am Not Afraid of You and I Will Beat Your Ass. Enjoy.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, June 15, 2006

When it came time for Martha Stewart to name the newest magazine in her ever-growing, post-prison empire, a magazine to fit alongside such titles as Martha Stewart Living, Everyday Food, and Body+Soul, what did she choose? Well, Blueprint of course!

Missing image - blueprint1.jpg

What, that sounds familiar? Well, it should. It's also the name of the 20-year old British publication (left in the image above) that bills itself as "the international authority on contemporary architecture, design, and culture."

Does this mean that Martha is aiming to supplant that old rag as THE authority on those subjects? Probably not, as the subtitle of Martha's magazine is "Design your life," indicating that it's yet another in that fast-growing segment of weeklies and monthlies: lifestyle magazines. A search at magazines.com yields 175 titles in this broad category with, naturally, Oprah's self-titled one the most popular. Perhaps Martha has her sites on this other female-run empire and not some narrowly-focused, oversized magazine from across the pond.

Martha's Blueprint says to me what most architects have always known: that design permeates our lives in pratically every aspect of it, from where we live and work to the cars we drive, the products we buy and use, the toilets we sit on, the clothes we wear. I've always found Metropolis Magazine to be the most overt illustration of this fact, but in an intellectual and critical, rather than consumer-driven, way. Most of the time we "design our lives" not literally but by choosing what to buy, so that our clothes, our houses, our cars are an extension of us. It looks like Blueprint will be another magazine towards this end, with page after page after page of suggestions for what to buy in the guise of creating a new and unique you.

3 Comments:

At Thursday, June 15, 2006 6:52:00 PM, Blogger jimmy said...

I agree that we design our lives by choosing what to wear, live in, surround ourselves with, etc., but there's more to it than that. With an almost infinite availabillity of information, we "design" - or maybe "edit" is a better word - our lives by choosing what information we access, and to a lesser extent, what information we're peripherally exposed to.

 
At Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:36:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

re: Metropolis — intellectual & critical in its approach undoubtedly, but surely also in no small measure consumer-driven?

 
At Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:01:00 PM, Blogger John said...

jimmy - You're certainly correct, and I'd hate to think that we are solely defined by what we buy to surround us. Though I think magazines like this push that more than the other alternatives. And there's got to be a lot of problems in life that just can't be solved by purchasing a product but by being creative and "designing" a solution ourselves.

anon - Yes, Metropolis certainly has some consumer-driven content. What comes to mind is the industrial design that is featured a lot, such as Herman Miller chairs. Regardless, I think their approach is not so much pushing these things on people as it is critically thinking about their design and therefore the success of the design itself.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

I couldn't help but laugh when I saw this advertisement on a visit to Europaconcorsi earlier today.

Missing image - bofill1.jpg

Most prestigious in the world? See for yourself.

Googling that phrase, it looks like somebody over at Archinect beat me to the punch, once again.

2 Comments:

At Friday, June 16, 2006 11:26:00 PM, Anonymous Geoff Diamond said...

Anyone that stuck us with Dearborn Center could hardly be considered prestigious :)

 
At Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:26:00 AM, Blogger harald said...

well, he gets some attention by calling himself most prestigious...

but when the flash-page elements focus on a picture of himself instead of projects, i just start vomiting :p

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Maybe I'm reaching a bit too far on this one, but as soon as I saw the design for Donald Trump's modestly-titled Trump Soho by David Rockwell, I immediately thought of an unbuilt project by Tadao Ando in the same city.

Missing image - trump-soho.0.jpg

These doctored images try to illustrate where I see the similarities, namely in the only two overt design gestures by Ando in his penthouse renovation/addition, a glass bar capping the existing building and a diagonal glass bar appearing to pierce the building (it comes out on the other side, not apparent in the rendering below) a few floors below. Perhaps the latter element has a stronger connection with Rockwell's design where -- even though it's all new construction and is protruding from a glass wall instead of stone -- it's treated as a strong, linear gesture in front of a muted and repetitive background.

Missing image - ando-penthouse.jpg

Feel free to tell me if I'm full of it, though keep in mind that I'm not saying Rockwell was inspired by or copied Ando's design (they're physically not that similar) but moreso that our minds make some interesting and unpredictable connections owing, in no small part, to the limitations of architectural imagery.

11 Comments:

At Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:09:00 PM, Anonymous Geoff Diamond said...

Not seeing it :)

 
At Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:02:00 PM, Anonymous John said...

Maybe, maybe not. The Ando proposal looks to be for a building on 7th Ave in the high 20's which was converted to coops about 6 or 7 years ago. A ridiculous proposal. The Rockwell/Trump proposal only adds a bit to an otherwise Ok proposal but what smacks me as rank bad planning is that the site, currently a parking lot, is virtually at the mouth of the Holland Tunnel. I suppose anyone rich enough is dumb enough to sit in a cab for half an hour with the meter ticking to go the last few blocks to the doorman should he still be breathing. But there is a subway stop a half block away.

 
At Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:05:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

stretching a bit, but i guess i can see it...

on the other hand the new building is not remotely close to the quality of ando's idea...rockwell is very good at being bland...

 
At Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:00:00 AM, Anonymous "I've got an opinion" said...

Anonymous said it best: "Rockwell is very good at being bland."

He hit the nail on the head right there. He's bland at best. I'm so over his work... never really into it, actually.

 
At Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:17:00 AM, Blogger John said...

I was surprised when I saw that Rockwell is the architect for Trump's Soho project. His name makes me think of restaurants, set design, and other interior jobs, not buildings and definitely not of this scale. He seems to have a theatrical approach to design, something that may be appropriate in this case (each building is an actor in the island's ongoing play) but also may just as easily be the wrong approach on this project if taken too literally.

 
At Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:02:00 PM, Blogger awww said...

I see it, totally. It's not that the buildings are similar, it's that these representations are similar.

 
At Thursday, June 15, 2006 5:57:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

John, I could only hope that the Rockwell's proposal would be theatrical as you say - then it would at least make some sort of contribution to the city. So far this seems like a hideous (not bland) addition to soho/tribeca. It is interesting that you thought of Ando though, since he is someone who I see as diametrically opposed to Rockwell, where his proposals+built work are brimming with complexity, sensitivity to site, light, space, people and community...

 
At Friday, June 16, 2006 12:42:00 PM, Blogger BFrancese said...

Yeah I see the comparison, though Ando's insertions seem to be a bit more thoughtful in some sense (though this can be argued). It was a suprising scheme to me as well (the trump proposal)

 
At Monday, June 19, 2006 10:24:00 PM, Blogger IRST said...

I don't see it, they only similarities i see, is the fact that they both have green tinted glass. That menas they are just made of the material, but so are alot of other buidings int he world

 
At Saturday, June 24, 2006 12:35:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about Atelier in midtown?

 
At Monday, June 26, 2006 1:36:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rockwell is only doing the interiors - Handel Architects is responsible for the architecture of the tower.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Missing image - archihat.jpg
"Of course the budgie is the bird of choice for architects."

Find this drawing and many, many more at Mattias Adolfsson's blog, Mattias Inks, and The home of Mattias O Adolfsson, a repository of many wonderful drawings, sketches, doodles, and comics, including some especially beautiful drawings of rural Sweden.

(via Drawn)

4 Comments:

At Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:36:00 AM, Blogger Mattias said...

Nice to be noticed, I have the greatest respect for Architects by the way, started to study it, but switch to graphic design instead

 
At Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:20:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Likewise I have respect for graphic designers. I did some graphic design in college when I worked at a book/copy store. It certainly wasn't very fancy stuff but it helped make me understand what goes into graphic design.

Great drawings, by the way!

 
At Saturday, June 17, 2006 9:21:00 PM, Blogger eBohn said...

And I thought it was a Shel Silverstein...

 
At Sunday, June 18, 2006 5:50:00 PM, Blogger John said...

E-I thought that at first myself.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Following up on its Bike 2000 Plan, the City of Chicago has released its Bike 2015 Plan.

Missing image - bike2015-1.jpg

According to the 56-page document (4mb PDF link):
The Bike 2015 Plan has two overall goals:
:: To increase bicycle use, so that 5 percent of all trips less than five miles are by bicycle.
:: To reduce the number of bicycle injuries by 50 percent from current levels.

The plan has eight chapters, each with a specific goal:
:: Bikeway Network -– Establish a bikeway network that serves all Chicago residents and neighborhoods.
:: Bicycle-friendly Streets -– Make all of Chicago’s streets safe and convenient for bicycling.
:: Bike Parking -– Provide convenient and secure short-term and long-term bike parking throughout Chicago.
:: Transit -– Provide convenient connections between bicycling and public transit.
:: Education -– Educate bicyclists, motorists, and the general public about bicycle safety and the benefits of bicycling.
:: Marketing and Health Promotion -– Increase bicycle use through targeted marketing and health promotion.
:: Law Enforcement and Crash Analysis -– Increase bicyclist safety through effective law enforcement and detailed crash analysis.
:: Bicycle Messengers -– Expand the use of bicycle messengers; improve their workplace safety and public image.
If you like numbered lists then you'll love the above document (best read in html as that version provides many links on what the city calls "Best Practices", meaning other places providing for bikes better than Chicago). Me, I couldn't make it through the thing if I tried. But I did read the below table, and it helped temper my initial excitement at hearing about the plan and its far-reaching goals.

Missing image - bike2015-2.jpg

Comparing the current state of things on the left with the 10-year plan on the right, those totals look good (185 miles) but the gains appear to fall primarily into two categories: Bike Lanes (46 miles) and Signed Routes (85 miles).

Bike Lanes are "five or six-foot wide corridors for the exclusive use of cyclists" and are located between parked and moving cars. A lot of drivers don't respect the lane and double-park their cars, forcing bikers into moving traffic. Furthermore, bikers have to be extremely careful of people opening drivers-side doors into the lane.

Signed Routes don't have dedicated bike lanes, but are merely connections between streets with actual bike lanes. They direct bikers to nearby lanes but aren't any safer, since many times they are too narrow for bike lanes.

So approximately 70% of the new Miles in 2015 will be the extension of already risky and dangerous conditions. That might explain why about four or five (depending on how you look at it) of the eight chapters of the plan address the second goal of bike safety. So the City's saying, "since we can't layout and design safe routes, let's just figure it out some other, cheaper way." Regardless, I'm looking forward to those Raised Bike Lanes and Bike Boulevards.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

These two projects by Portland, Oregon-based Holst Architecture are mixed-use, urban developments of roughly the same size in the firm's hometown.

Missing image - HD25a.jpg
Belmont Street Lofts

Each treats the exterior wall as a porous, screen-like zone that gives each a strong presence in its context while also giving the occupants a reasonable amount of shade and privacy.

Missing image - HD25b.jpg
Belmont Street Lofts

The Belmont Street Lofts offer 27 loft/condo apartments ranging from 850-1,000 s.f., located over 4,000 s.f. of retail and some parking. In addition to its exterior rainscreen/sunshade, the building also features radiant floor heating aimed towards increased energy efficiency.

Missing image - HD25c.jpg
Thurman Street Lofts

The Thurman Street Lofts -- the more recent of the two projects -- extend the articulated, wood exterior towards a more sculptural end, with windows almost carved from the dark wood facades.

Missing image - HD25d.jpg
Thurman Street Lofts

(Thanks to Jeremy G. for the head's up!)

Labels:

4 Comments:

At Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:47:00 PM, Anonymous jj said...

Holst is doing some nice things and the quality of design in Portland is shifting rapidly. Portland is a graphic design hotbed of activity so it makes sense.

Also, these buildings are in nice, interesting and rather non corporate environs.

 
At Friday, June 16, 2006 1:55:00 PM, Blogger Michael Allen said...

The porousness nicely minimizes the smotehring dullness that flat curtain walls can bring to a building. Evern very cool curtain-wall modern buildings can look flat. Here, the wall plane has both texture and lightness. This is good design.

 
At Friday, June 16, 2006 3:13:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Really reminds me of Gigon & Guyer projects, specifically their sports center in Davos that uses multiple layers of screening to achieve a similar effect

 
At Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:26:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

we did it before ;-)
http://hv-a.com/hv_it/comete.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, June 12, 2006

My weekly page update:
missing image - merchants4sm.jpg
Cantina Ghidossi in Cadenazzo, Switzerland by Aurelio Galfetti.

The updated book feature is Cruelty & Utopia: Cities and Landscapes of Latin America, edited by Jean-Francois Lejeune.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
LayerMag
"A platform for interaction, exposure and participation of South Asian designers, at all stages to experience and share their ideologies, which will help evolve the present status quo."

Archfarm
"Publication focuses on the analysis and diffusion of initiatives and collectives that have no space in other communication channels: critical thinking, theoretical discourse and the latest proposals on architecture and tangent issues." (added to sidebar under online journals)

Phylotaxis
"An exploration of space where science meets culture."

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:23:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just want to thank you for the swiss dose. I had a craving for some Ticino.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, June 09, 2006

In the process of research for my next weekly dose, I came across the Architecture & Design archive of S.Pellegrino. Yep, the Italian company with that bubbly water. Each article describes a usually Italian exhibition, building, piece of furniture, design object, with explanatory text and numerous images. The archive has 26 pages with four articles, making for hours and hours of learning and eye candy.

Missing image - scarpa1.jpg

The latest article is Three Days with Carlo Scarpa (above) regarding "an unprecedented series of events in honor of this famous contemporary architect on the occasion of his centenary birthday."

1 Comments:

At Saturday, June 10, 2006 9:13:00 PM, Anonymous Joseph J. Palatinus AIA said...

I learned something of this wonderful Architect as I was getting to know Mario Botta back in the early '80s. Mr. Scarpa was the advisor of Mr. Botta's thesis in school as I remember. In the magazine Lotus Internation #28 Mr. Scarpa's his Bank project in Verona is highlighted which was completed two years after his death. He is a complex Architect who was totally into his Art

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, June 08, 2006

As part of Chicago's newfound quest to sell itself to the highest bidder, the Millennium Park Bike Station is now the McDonald's Cycle Center. Unlike the other pieces of Millennium Park with corporate names, such as the BP Bridge, the bike station (I can't yet call it a cycle center, sorry) is not named for the corporate entity that donated funds to made it happen. This is well after the fact and is focused on naming rights and probably long-term maintenance and service costs.

Missing image - mcdcc1.jpg

I can't help but wonder if these doctored images are the future of the park. It's a small step from naming to signage.

Missing image - mcdcc2.jpg

(via Gapers Block)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

The May/June issue of the Boston Society of Architects/AIA's ArchitectureBoston publication revolves around the theme UGLY. One of the highlights includes a roundtable discussion, "Pretty Ugly" (PDF link).

Missing image - bsa-ugly.jpg

As their web page indicates, "Unlike many other architecture publications, we are an 'ideas' magazine rather than a 'picture book.' Our stories connect architecture to social, cultural, political, and economic trends. Provocative and passionate, always clear and sometimes witty..."

Now for my rant.

This is news to me, and I gotta say that the more I see AIA chapter publications -- first New York's and now Boston's (humorously each chapter bills itself as the largest AIA chapter) -- the more I realize that Chicago's chapter newsletter (Focus) is but a fraction of what