Monday, July 31, 2006

Dear readers,

In exactly four weeks I start school again. Yes, after nearly ten years in professional practice, I'm heading back to school for a Master's degree, specifically the Master's in Urban Planning at City College's Urban Design Program, headed by Michael Sorkin and located in the great city of New York.

What brings this on, you ask? Well, going back to school for a Master's degree (I have a five-year Bachelor's degree from Kansas State) has always been on my mind, though in varying degrees since starting my first job. I've seen it as a way to pursue something more defined than undergrad, more personal, and reflecting some experience with practice and "how the world works." Now with marriage and the prospects that that brings, this might be the last chance I have to pursue this goal. But more importantly, the Urban Design Program's focus on sustainable and pedestrian-oriented planning is something I feel strongly about and feel is timely and important, for reasons that don't require too much explanation here.

Regardless, here's a quote that might help illustrate what I'm thinking, taken from Michael Hough's City Form and Natural Process, written in 1984 but still apt (if not even more) today:
As environment and energy issues assume a higher profile in the future, it will become increasingly necessary to broaden the horizons of urban design to meet new goals. Urban land as a whole will be required to assume environmental, productive, and social roles, as fundamental components of the urban design process...Many of the problems generated by the city and imposed on the larger natural environment will have to be resolved within it.
I'm mentioning this here to alert readers that August might be a slow month in these parts. I'll need to make multiple trips to New York to find an apartment, help my wife find a job, register for classes, and all that other good stuff that goes along with going back to school and uprooting one's life. I plan on keeping this page, my weekly page, and the archi-tourist going, though the frequency of posts on this page will be determined by my schedule and workload. Each one of these pages are a great outlet for me, my interests, and my wanderings about the world and the internet, and I don't plan on any of that lapsing anytime soon.

Sincerely,

John

13 Comments:

At Monday, July 31, 2006 9:13:00 PM, Anonymous Aaron - San Francisco said...

congratulations john! Good luck to you and K! mano man this is a huge year!

...i believe anita hill... !SY non-sequiter!

excited for you guys - will keep look out for blogspots.

 
At Monday, July 31, 2006 10:56:00 PM, Anonymous B said...

Beautiful, Congradulations. I have been following the weekly dose for a while now. It continues to be enriching to my knowledge of architecture.
I wish you luck in your study and in NY...

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:20:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

very cool.

i met michael sorkin in genoa a couple of years ago. he did a lecture for a thing i was invited to. A few other bigger nam starchitects were speaking too, but i think michael's lecture was the most interesting. a very unique approach to planning. pity it is seldom taken much beyond the theory stage.

i imagine his school is as interesting, and as challenging. and you get to live in new york. great city.

good luck!

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 1:04:00 AM, Anonymous Murray said...

Fantastic!

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:30:00 AM, Blogger Frank said...

Congrats, John. And good luck. We're glad that you're able to do this. And we're also glad you'll be 8 hours closer. We found out this weekend that the train to NYC has a stop within walking distance of our place. Pretty cool. I'm interested to see the webpage with a different vantage point.

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:20:00 AM, Anonymous Hector said...

congrats.... Good luck !

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:32:00 AM, Anonymous anita said...

hey there, i discovered your site through .. hmmm ... i think it was through 'musing' ... not sure at this point.

best of luck and i hope you enjoy your studies and your stay here in new york. lots of stuff going on here for sure ... some of it quite controversial, but it's always interesting ... case in point: frank gehry's atlantic yards project in the middle of a firestorm, as you may well be aware ... the whole downtown semi-debacle ... oh it's all quite stress inducing. but it's all fun to watch.

but getting back to the original point i wanted to make ... great site !! i look forward to reading more as you commence your journey at city college !!

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:52:00 AM, Blogger Jason266 said...

Good luck with the degree. I've been thinking about a Master degree since I received by Bachelor of Architecture in 2000. I've kicked around a planning degree as well as a historic preservation degree.

Anyway, I'm babbling. Good luck and update when you can. I really enjoy your websites.

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:02:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thats right.......get the Mrs. to start working.........
Good Luck to you and yours.

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:05:00 PM, Blogger NUMSTEAD said...

Congrats John! Since I discoverred your blog and other websites a year ago, I've always looked forward to checking them during my lunch hour and then using them as a gateway to other fantastic architectural resources. I can't wait to find out what new insights you'll glean from being in a new city and back at school!

 
At Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:24:00 AM, Blogger Stan said...

Best of luck to you!

 
At Monday, August 07, 2006 9:01:00 PM, Anonymous Nathalie said...

Good luck to you, and also to your better half. We will try to visit soon.

 
At Monday, August 07, 2006 11:37:00 PM, Blogger Jennifer said...

Wow - that's exciting. Good for you. Will look forward to reading what's up from your new part of the world. Best wishes!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Stumbling about ARCOweb, I came across this project by the current Pritzker laureate, Paulo Mendes de Rocha (with Metro Arquitetos) for a rather brazen addition to the Museu Nacional de Belas-Artes in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Missing image - mendes1.jpg

It's in Portuguese, so I'll let the images speak for themselves.

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:57:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

F all that Hertzog and Piano crap, that is how you do architecture.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

My weekly page update:
missing image - erez3sm.jpg
Mountain Retreat in Kerhonkson, New York by Resolution: 4 Architecture.

The updated book feature is Tadao Ando: Complete Works, edited by Philip Jodidio.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Coroflot
"A career and community site for creative professionals [that] hosts individual creative portfolios [for free!] and a database of job and project openings."

East Coast Architecture Review
"Providing Commentary, Discourse & Insight into Architecture & Allied Design from the Southeastern United States." (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

Architektur Blog
New German architecture blog, in German. (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, July 30, 2006

Ibirapuera2
Ibirapuera2 by digdoi
Auditorium of the Ibirapuera Park by Oscar Niemeyer, in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

6 Comments:

At Monday, July 31, 2006 12:50:00 PM, Blogger brayan said...

sweet...

an i thought he'd be senile by now...

 
At Monday, July 31, 2006 12:51:00 PM, Blogger brayan said...

btw check out my bloggy
thnx

http://sweetlittlegame.blogspot.com

you've been linked
xxx
*i love gringos

 
At Monday, July 31, 2006 3:49:00 PM, Anonymous digdoi said...

Thanks for the dose, John.

More photos and info about Oscar Niemeyer's buildings in the Ibirapuera Park:
http://www.pushpullbar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1585

Fabio Doi

 
At Monday, July 31, 2006 5:27:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Thanks for the link, digdoi. One of these days I'll get into PushPullBar. It's got so much stuff and so many ongoing discussions...though sometimes I feel like I wouldn't have time for the rest of this as I'd spend all my time there.

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:30:00 AM, Anonymous digdoi said...

Hehe, I know exactly what you mean.
I can barely imagine your efforts to maintain your pages, since just moderating PPB already take me more time that I have.
Hope you find the time to get there sometimes and wish you all the best in this whole new phase of your life.

Regards and keep up the great work

 
At Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:59:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oscar Niemeyer makes my toes curl.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, July 28, 2006

Sundial Bridge
Sundial Bridge by informedmindstravel
Sundial Bridge in Redding, CA by Santiago Calatrava.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Get an inside look at Steven Holl's Simmons Hall dormitory at MIT in this cool short film by redbucketfilms.



(Thanks for the head's up, Josh!)

4 Comments:

At Friday, July 28, 2006 6:41:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

Just more proof that the building should remain closer to four walls and a roof. I'm not against progress and investigation and experiment, it's just I haven't seen anything I like come out of it.

I'll keep looking though.

 
At Friday, July 28, 2006 9:41:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Needed better moderation..........the architecture is exciting, the moderator too monotone..........

 
At Saturday, July 29, 2006 10:17:00 AM, Anonymous K. J. Ehm said...

Dear John,
thank you for indicating the linkage to REDBUCKETs website; appreciating your work as a valuable source; have a good weekend,
Joshua


Knud Joshua EHM • Architect • MadangWorks©
Yeongbi Eochonga • # 1811
NE-Sudong-6-Bunji • Jongro Gu
Seoul, ROK.
Tel.: + 82 /.2 / 637 - 11 234
Fax.: + 82 /.2 / 637 - 11 233
Mob.:+ 82 / .10 / 712 - 73 561
E-mail.: kjehm@mac.com

 
At Saturday, July 29, 2006 8:32:00 PM, Anonymous tom z said...

what happened. no longer getting film - white space now.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, July 27, 2006

The seemingly impossible (or unpossible, as Ralph Wiggum would say) just might happen. Commercial Property News confirms a rumor I've heard, that Blue Cross Blue Shield will expand its headquarters in Chicago's East Loop by adding 24 stories on top of its current 30 floors. That's right, on top of its current building.

Missing image - bcbs1.jpg

Completed in 1997, the building by now defunct Lohan Associates (apparently attributed to James Goettsch via inclusion on his firm's web page and not Lohan Anderson's) was actually designed to be expanded vertically, an intelligent but far-fetched approach. Considerations include leaving some space in the core empty in anticipation of a new bank of elevators for the addition, space that can be used for the tower crane during construction; and creating a large plaza to the north that can be used for staging during that time. Regardless of these and other measures, now that that time has almost come, it should be interesting to see just how smooth the process is and if they can pull it off.

And speaking of stacking, Freitag's new shop in Zurich that recently opened is comprised of 17 used shipping containers stacked into four columns of varying heights. Architects spillman.echsle found an appropriate design for a company that makes and sells "recycled freewaybags."

Missing image - freitag1.jpg

More photos can be seen at Freitag's Flickr sets.

(via WM$NA)

5 Comments:

At Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:55:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

bp seez:

i heard that rumor quite a few years ago as well. except i heard it had the copacity to essentially double its height due to early 'planing ahead'...hopefully the give that dawg a face liftwhile there at it.

 
At Friday, July 28, 2006 12:47:00 PM, Blogger brayan said...

freitag rock(s)

 
At Friday, July 28, 2006 6:18:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I can't help but wonder what in the building suffered because of the nifty trick getting priority.

Like building an additional building would have been so difficult.

(or something)

 
At Saturday, July 29, 2006 4:37:00 PM, Anonymous RBD said...

If they have any integrity, the building owners will fix the window's exterior at the same time. It is one of the worst buildings in Chicago for bird kills (and the owners know it).

 
At Friday, August 04, 2006 6:31:00 PM, Blogger Sandig said...

This is soooo coool! My husband has thought of building a cottage in a similar fashion. Love the look of the containers and the windows. Would love to see more...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Frank Lloyd Wright’s Muirhead Farmhouse, Hampshire, IL
Frank Lloyd Wright’s Muirhead Farmhouse, Hampshire, IL by Karla's
The Muirhead Farmhouse by FLLW, now a bed and breakfast.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

About 180 degrees from the Tate Modern Extension posted earlier today is UC Berkeley's Chang-Lin Tien Center, designed by Tod Williams Billie Tsien Architects. Yep, them.

Missing image - tien2.jpg

While it may not resemble other projects by the New York-based architects -- the Neurosciences Institute, the Folk Art Museum, the Cranbrook Natatorium -- it clearly exhibits their thoughtfulness and sensitivity to site, client, and program. And compared with the Herzog & de Meuron design for the Tate, this project is much more clear on what's happening inside.

(via Javlog)

10 Comments:

At Wednesday, July 26, 2006 7:38:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

does it matter that you understand what is going on inside? does it matter that you can predict the interior by looking at the exterior?

it is a personal thing, but i rather like the h and m project, and am less impressed by this project, which is after all quite standard fare, actually a lot like the work i used to do when i started out in architecture in the 90's. Not all architecture has to make a statement, or be radical, but the aspiration should still be to create inspiring spaces. this project looks, at least in the rendering, like a quite flat place to be.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:05:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Well, I was bringing up the legibility of the interior from the exterior as a way to compare and contrast the two projects, but since you ask it's not the most important quality for a design. At the same time it's not unimportant, especially in terms of its place in its context.

To me, the HdM project, if built, will alter its context extremely, to the detriment of the existing Tate, even though HdM deny that. The rendering I added to the post even tries to play down its effect on its surroundings by mapping the adjacent buildings on the surfaces. This shows to me that they're aware of its hulking, super-busy massing.

On the other hand, the TWBTA design is perhaps too sensitive in its relationship to the UC Berkely campus. They were probably put in a situation that many architects are put in on campus buildings: design to match or don't build at all. But this is only one rendering, and having been in a few of their buildings, I have faith that what looks simple and flat (to you) will turn out to have more complexity and depth than what is apparent in that watercoloring.

One big difference between the two is that this project is currently under construction while the Tate addition is in its first stages, planned for completion in six years, meaning that design is far from "done".

As a postscript, I'm usually a HUGE fan of HdM, but this design just doesn't do it for me. Perhaps it will sink in and grow on me over time, but for now I can't help but think that they pushed the envelope as far as it could go and will have to tone it down from here, as the design undergoes cost estimates, approvals, and other parts of the process.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:57:00 PM, Blogger Reverb said...

Let me preface this by saying that I am a huge fan of HdM and think they are one of the only starchitects out there today who are worth a damn. I wouldn't want to get kicked out of any architectural circles and have to turn in my black frames. However...some of the work has been getting a little self righteous latley...

Further, I'm not a huge fan of the representationl style TWBTA choose (it actually suprises the hell out of me), but at the same time it is pretty much impossible to take either of these projects at face value based on a rendering or two.

The great thing abou TWBTA's work is the overt simplicity paired with astonishly suprising spatial qualities. I will say that the watercoler does little to evoke inspiration, but I'll give TWBTA the beinfit of the doubt. I'd be interested to see the outdoor space that bleeds off the right side of the image...looks a little like Neuroscience with different clothes on.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006 4:52:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think I would like the TWBTA project more if they got rid of the hip roof (a bit too residential) and added an interesting cornice to it w/ interlocking forms in their minimalist style. It it clean, but as John mentioned, it is also flat.

I am not ordinarily a HdM fan, and also have a visceral reaction to the form-making that has been popularized as of lately. To be quite honest, HdM is steadily approaching sculpture for living in. In contrast to most of these types of projects, in terms of proportion and translucency, I think they pulled it off like Nude Descending a Staircase...

However, is it functional, is it economical?

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:00 AM, Blogger Reverb said...

Maybe, as Todd and Billie were discussing the project one of them light heartedly proclaimed "Yeah, what this project needs is a hip roof" Someone obviously became confused and instead of drawing a roof that epitomized the latest trends in fashionable architecture they drew that instead.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:02:00 PM, Blogger John said...

The hip roof appears so shallow in the rendering, so when somebody sees the building from the ground - as opposed to this aerial view - it might not be visible. Then it's all about the exterior wall and its stone surfacing.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:23:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good point, John. It's all a matter of perspective.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:11:00 PM, Anonymous Dana Buntrock said...

Sorry to take so long to add a few words on the Tsien Center. I am on the faculty of the UC Berkeley Department of Architecture and associated with the Institute for East Asian Studies, so I care deeply about this building.

Without going into details, there is some helpful background. First, this buildings was designed for a site called Memorial Glade on our campus. For better or worse, the administration, in response to some hulking brutalist buildings built many years ago, insisted that any building on the glade have neo-classical overtones. Yep - Tod and Billie do not exactly spring to mind in that context, but have valiantly responded. The stone selected for the facade is apparently quite lovely, and having seen test patches for the exposed concrete, I am very excited about the sandblasted concrete finishes elsewhere in the building.

And if sandblasted concrete brings to mind the American Folkcraft Museum, it should - this building was designed around the same time, and just took a loooong (looooong) time to get funded. In fact, because of funding limitations, only the library will be built for the moment.

Finally, the rendering was done by the university for promotion purposes. Tod and Billie seem to (quietly) hate it - but clients are like that, you know? They do dumb things, and good architects grin and bear it, knowing the true test is in the building, not the eyewash.

 
At Friday, July 28, 2006 11:19:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Dana, Thanks for your insights, especially about the rendering. I seem to recall that Tod and Billie rarely, if ever, produce presentation materials (models, renderings). Maybe that's just a myth, but I've always taken it to mean they focus on materials, detailing, process, etc, rather than eyewash, as you put it.

Speaking of materials, the attention that Tod and Billie give to materials in their built projects gives me hope that this one will turn out really well.

 
At Saturday, July 29, 2006 4:55:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It looks like a Walgreens.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Missing image - tate2.jpg

From World Architecture News:
Swiss architects Herzog & de Meuron have today revealed plans for their £215 million iconic extension to the former power station on the south bank of the River Thames. The new 7,000 m² extension will be built on land to the south of the Tate Modern reclaimed from EDF energy networks. A new entrance and piazza to the 4 million visitor/year venue will allow north-south pedestrian passage through the complex. Ten new galleries will be provided in the 10 stories above ground and a performing space will be created within the former oil tanks, once used to feed the power station located below ground. The Mayor of London today pledged £7 million pounds towards the project through the London Development Agency. Completion is scheduled for 2012.
Missing image - tate2-2.jpg

Kinda makes Steven Holl's addition to the Nelson-Atkins look sensitive.

More at Google News.

Update: The image below and more, with commentary by Hugh Pearman, at Gabion.

Missing image - tate2-3.jpg

Update 07.26: The Tate's official site on the addition is Transforming Tate Modern, "an opportunity for you to see how the project is developing and how Tate is responding to local people's views."

Missing image - tate2-4.jpg

On Tate's page is the view above, which better illustrates the extension's siting and its view from across the Thames, less imposing than other renderings.

14 Comments:

At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:44:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

bp seez:

i don't know man. i have always applauded H&DeM but i agree. i think that they are now being baroque for the sake of it and not for any sort of true expression or relationship.

suffering from 'big' dawg' syndrome if you ask me. totally dissapointed!

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:55:00 AM, Blogger Adrian said...

I'm not sure that I think it is wholly insensitive, as Tate Modern is quite a stark industrial building to begin with.

In some ways it reminds me of Rachel Whiteread's recent installation (that may just be due to currency though).

That, or a game of Jenga.

I'm intrigued to know the material - it looks like glass on the picture on the left.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:09:00 PM, Blogger John said...

At first glance it's like they took SANAA's New Museum and took it to the next level, stacking and skewing boxes at whim. It's like a glass mountain or a reassemblage of the glass bars they inserted into the existing building's grand space and roof.

I'm not sure yet I understand what's going on with this addition, though, especially from the inside, as visual information is non-existent. The way it meets the old industrial building and then breaks free and rises from it is interesting, I'm just not sure this is the best way to do it.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:19:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

looks like Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:25:00 PM, Blogger brayan said...

creepy

living in barcelona i've seen H&DEM at their very worst. believe me, they can be quite bad.

what is it with these jenga-style poorly baked towerish thingys (read new new museum...)

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:31:00 PM, Blogger brayan said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:33:00 PM, Blogger brayan said...

sh*t
i didn't read the prior comments
now i look like a total dork
like a mexican parrot

anyways
i have a new "architecture" blog
in case you wanna drop by...

http://sweetlittlegame.blogspot.com

xxx

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:58:00 PM, Anonymous John said...

Just another hideous example of what H.H.Richardson called the First Rule of Architecture- Get the job!
With that monstrosity looming behind it, the simple elegance of the former power station will be ruined especially from other side of the river. Up close, they will probably just clash.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:11:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is H&DeM going Gehry?

For some odd reason, I like the design. This cubist cat-in-the-bag is an obvious play of contrasts against the more fine boned Tate Modern next to it.

It is almost 21st century "event" architecture, simply trying to build the seemingly impossible. Not unlike the pyramids...

There are questions of context, but I suppose the truth is that our art museums are replacing the place of churches of the 1800's. Unfortunately, it represents the priority of of human ideas and humanism over God in popular culture.

Meanwhile our churches become more pedestrian...

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 5:02:00 PM, Blogger Floyd Landis said...

Typical "Star" architect bull crap. The emporor has no clothes. Please stop foisting this junk on the public while proclaiming how brilliant and creative you are. KMA.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:57:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

...it looks like a cubist interpretation of the de Young tower...

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:59:00 AM, Blogger Geoff Manaugh said...

Provided they can climate-control the thing - which looks rather difficult - and that the construction is executed well, with the right materials, I think it's actually kind of a cool design. Of course, that's not having seen any interior views, and having no sense of how it will actually look on site, once built. Foster's GLA, for instance, doesn't look half-bad in mock-ups but its actual physical presence is cheap, disappointing, already weathered, and strangely dimunitive, like a hunchback in some Hammer horror film.

In any case, the crystalline, almost cinematic quality of this thing seems interesting to me. I just have a feeling it won't work, aesthetically, in the British climate, and that it will look cheap from the instant it opens.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 6:39:00 AM, Blogger Norman Blogster said...

IMHO, this isn't architecture - it's a classic iConic eye-con in the making.
It'll be interesting to follow it through from initial media stories & images & "enigmatic metaphors" (as Jencks calls them), through its nickname (any bets? "The Zigurrat" seems favourite at the mo), its funding & planning process to actual built reality.

Modern art is more about process than product nowadays - is that what's maybe happening here? While Modern Art tries to become more like architecture, do we have a case of architecture trying to become more like art?

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 6:46:00 AM, Blogger Norman Blogster said...

Sorry - Jencks says "enigmatic signifiers", not "enigmatic metaphors".

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, July 24, 2006

duomo di milano
duomo di milano by twoeightnine
A detail of Milan's Cathedral.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

My weekly page update:
missing image - erez3sm.jpg
Halmstad Library in Halmstad, Sweden by Schmidt Hammer Lassen.

The updated book feature is Peter Walker and Partners: Nasher Sculpture Center Garden, edited by Jane Amidon.

Some new (to me) architectural blogs, all added to the sidebar under blogs::architecture:
Kollectif
"Kollectif emerges from an intention to rally the different design professions...to facilitate communication between parties and, ultimately, to create and nourish a sense of curiosity towards each other. (en francais)

The Design Rag
"Illuminating commentary and illustrated visions of issues in architecture and urbanism."

Passion of the Architect
"the crazy world of architecture....the drama, the stories, the reality."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, July 22, 2006



Originally uploaded by gac.


To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, July 21, 2006

An anonymous tipster has sent us some photos of the Steven Holl-designed addition to the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City. The Bloch Building was first featured on this page back in March 05 and most recently with some pics in January of this year. The apparent split over the merits of the addition probably won't be remedied by these photos, exhibiting both the good and bad qualities of the design. The addition is scheduled to open June 2007.

Missing image - bloch1.jpg

Missing image - bloch2.jpg

Missing image - bloch3.jpg

Missing image - bloch4.jpg

Missing image - bloch5.jpg

Missing image - bloch6.jpg

Missing image - bloch7.jpg

Missing image - bloch8.jpg

Thanks anonymous!

10 Comments:

At Sunday, July 23, 2006 9:08:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It will be lovely outside at night and inside all the time. But this wing looks to be a daytime eyesore. I hope it didn't completely ruin the south mall of the museum.

 
At Monday, July 24, 2006 9:26:00 PM, Blogger John said...

It's hard to say if the yard is going to be improved by this addition. The early models make it look like it's impact is minimal, but seeing it here it's a bit overwhelming.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:00:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the new addition is wonderful. I live near the Nelson-Atkins and walk by the Bloch Building quite often. It is a much different experience seeing the building up close. Photographs simply do not do it justice. I think the earlier models of the building were intended to be merely conceptual. The new building blends in wonderfully with the original 1933 building as well as the Kansas City Sculpture Park and it is certainly not overwhelming.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:49:00 PM, Anonymous woodrow said...

Anonymous said...
. . . But this wing looks to be a daytime eyesore . . .

Really? Every time I see new pictures of the addition,I like it more. I love the massing of the buildings. I agree with what second Anonymous said . . photographs don't do it justice. I haven't seen the addition in months (I live in Chicago) but even last November with fences up and no landscaping, I thought the glass looked cool. As to the south lawn, in the summer it won't be very visible, but from inside the views out should be awesome.

As to the inside - well WOW!! I am giddy with excitement. Why can't June 2007 be now.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:51:00 PM, Blogger Eric said...

To say it looks better up close or that it complements the original building is a matter of opinion.

As it has come together it still just as much like a pole barn or utility shed. This is mainly due to the frosted glass and the vertical channels that were NOT present in the original plan's smooth glass lenses.

It's really two buildings. By night it's a very cool lightshow but by day it's an assy barn.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:16:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

... Because so many barns are constructed of curved glass panels that shimmer in the sunlight.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:01:00 PM, Blogger Eric said...

There would be far less controversy if Holl had delivered the lenses depicted in the original renderings.

A lot of the reaction to this design is a feeling of bait and switch. People felt that we were promised one design and then something very different appeared.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:29:00 PM, Blogger John said...

I have no idea how Holl could have achieved the effect depicted in the original models/renderings. It's so intangible and with a lack of detail that any materiality would make it seem different.

I think a lot of the objection/controversey is also its scale. The early design may have been more subterranean, making the above-ground portion smaller. There still might be a great deal of space underground and out of sight, but that which is above ground looks too big.

Looks like I'll need to take a trip back to ol' KC next year when this opens, rather than making any final judgement from photos.

 
At Monday, July 31, 2006 2:07:00 PM, Blogger yooperprof said...

On the south lawn, the dense landscaping practically hides the Holl lenses during daytime. I posted a few pictures on my blog:

http://my.opera.com/yooperprof/albums/show.dml?id=108580

The north lenses are much more prominent, but on the hazy summer day I was there, the structures seemed to blend into the sky.

 
At Monday, August 21, 2006 4:27:00 PM, Blogger Marc Fink said...

The channel glass forming the lenses is custom LINIT channel glass manufactured by Lamberts in Germany. For a channel glass comparison, look at Steven Holl's homepage, www.stevenholl.com, and the Holl/Marvel collaboration for the restored center section of Higgins Hall at Pratt Institute. The Pratt project won lighting awards from the IESNY and Architectural Lighting magazine, and the Bloch Building will surely receive praise for its lighting. Built with sandblasted channel glass, the Bloch Building thus appears whiter than Higgins Hall. For more information on LINIT channel glass, call me at Bendheim Wall Systems, exclusive North American distributor of LINIT, 800-221-7379 X223. Thank you for taking the time to comment on the largest channel glass project in North America, we are proud to have supplied the glass - Marc Fink.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

According to its web page, "a House of Sweden is being erected outside Sweden [for the first time], to be home to the Swedish embassy and representatives of Swedish commerce. The building will form a new Swedish arena in the United States. It is an unusual embassy building, housing a secretariat, 16 apartments and an Event Center."

Missing image - HD28a.jpg

Designed by Sweden's Gert Wingardh, the building's exterior is a banded composition of various materials, predominantly glass but also wood and stone. In the middle bands, a blond maple is covered in fritted glass below a laminated glass printed with a wood grain. Ironically perhaps, the latter has a stronger impact, though the faux wood grain appears almost comic.

Missing image - HD28b.jpg

This horizontal banding reflects the variety of uses within the House of Sweden: basement event center, ground floor public areas, 2nd floor Embass