Thursday, November 29, 2007

The California Academy of Sciences (under construction) by Renzo Piano Building Workshop, as seen from the M.H. de Young Museum by Herzog & de Meuron. Both are situated in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park.

Photo is best viewed SUPER LARGE to see the detail of the Academy of Sciences in the distance.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

2 Comments:

At Friday, November 30, 2007 2:46:00 PM, Blogger xixxix said...

As of today, the building is almost finished, it's on finishing touches, and the curators are starting the exhibition installation process.

 
At Friday, November 30, 2007 5:03:00 PM, Blogger MoneyMaker said...

I noticed the same thing today myself. Can't wait until it opens

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

"It is here [Baja California], in the Bay of Loreto, where developers are building a 5,000-unit resort designed by Andreas Duany, who is selling it to the world as 'the first ecologically friendly subdivision.' In a typical New Urbanist appeal, this mega development (PDF link) is customized by an authentic Mexican Village, completing the invasion of Loreto Bay by no only mono culture of upper-middle-class North American land owners who can afford this island of pleasure, but by 'Seaside' and 'Celebration' type of planning, making this the official arrival of New Urbanism in grand scale to the Mexican West Coast. Beyond issues of architectural style, however, it is tragic that these mega developments, as ecologically responsible and manicured as they can be, are indifferent to the social and economic inequalities they will engender, as these 'all inclusive' and gated environments might be eventually surrounded by the shanty towns built by their own service providers. This phenomenon will add to the strange asymmetry at the border and along the political equator's trajectory, as this will become another instance of the kind of neoliberalist urbanites worldwide that continue to be supported by cheap labor (service sector), on one end, and the emergence of expensive real estate (enclaves of wealth), on the other."
- Teddy Cruz, "Border Tours: Strategies of Surveillance, Tactics of Encroachment," from Indefensible Space: The Architecture of the National Insecurity State (2008), edited by Michael Sorkin.

Labels:

1 Comments:

At Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:44:00 PM, Anonymous David Sucher said...

It may be puffery (though I doubt it) and it remains to be seen whether they will be able to achieve their goals but the developers seem well-aware of the social conditions in the area. Their web page offers the following goals.

To improve social welfare, we will:

Implement a Regional Affordable Housing Strategy to ensure that people who work at Loreto Bay are able to afford to live in the area.
Support the development of a full service medical center in Loreto.
Dedicate one percent of the gross proceeds of all sales and re-sales, in perpetuity, to the Loreto Bay Foundation to assist with local social and community issues.
To ensure economic growth, we will:

Create significant new jobs in Loreto.
Enhance the local economy through responsible tourism and new business development.
Build a successful community that delivers a healthy rate of return to our investors, homeowners, and partners.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Much of my time over the Thanksgiving break was spent helping my parents pack their belongings to move out of the home in which they raised me and my sister. Located about 20 miles north of Chicago, the house is in what could be called an old suburb, with a gridded street pattern, small lots, and walking distance to shops, library, and a train station to Chicago.

Regardless of this condition, the McMansion phenomenon is still to be found in the area, though more likely on the large blocks of adjacent streets with larger lots than this street and its smaller lots, where new houses -- between the size of the old ranches or colonials and the trendy McMansions -- crowd their lots and leave very little yard space. Well, looking out the back of my parent's house I noticed one possible scenario for achieving large houses on small lots:

futurbia.jpg

Buy the next-door neighbor's lot, tear down the house, and plant grass! Yes, that open space directly behind my parent's yard used to be a house, a split-level 70s-era number, from what I recall. The orange-brick house on the right is a recent addition to the block (built after tearing down a one-story house about the size of my parent's house) that did this duty.

While the newfound airspace and light seems refreshing (though late, considering the move) it also strikes me as a cautious scenario for transforming "old" suburbs into "new" suburbs. Where critics of suburbia offer future scenarios that call for adding density to suburbs old and new, in effect filling in further the existing voids, this gesture, if writ large, would make the transformation of the suburbs into a more sustainable use of land close to impossible. Not only would it push houses even further out across the landscape, it would make the place affordable to only those that can afford two houses and pay property taxes on a relatively unused lot.

I can see my parent's suburb -- Northbrook, the home of Ferris Bueller and other John Hughes teen flicks -- as being desirable for the qualities I mentioned earlier, though the hypothetical application of this two-lot apparatus to the area would be similar to what's happening in Manhattan: the desirability of the place drives the price beyond the reach of the lower and middle classes (minus irregular, crowded situations). This isn't to say Northbrook is as desirable as Manhattan, but I do think that these and other old suburbs will become more desirable as people see the inferior nature of the new suburbs and attempt a scenario that tries to meld the two (walkability and other qualities of the old with the giant size of the new houses and lots) before other alternatives are tried and the tide turns.

10 Comments:

At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 8:18:00 AM, Blogger dp said...

been a fan of your blog, great to see the town we grew up in as the feature of your blog.

 
At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:37:00 AM, Blogger Trevor said...

I think one big problem is that the owner of the two lots pays very little tax on the now vacant lot since property taxes mostly fall on buildings (80% on average) instead of land. If we reform the property tax law such that land was taxed at a higher rate and buildings at a lower rate fewer people would do what your parent's neighbors did.

Want density? Tax land and relieve taxes on buildings and other improvements.

 
At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:04:00 AM, Anonymous saha said...

old suburbs rule. i grew up in glenview. mixed feelings about The Glen, though.

 
At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:31:00 AM, Blogger César said...

Well it would actually have to be rezoned as well to allow more density right? That way land would be more expensive and not affordable for a single family.
I remember a suburb in Berlin where old huge mansions were turned into several mid to high end appartments. Some of it looked kind of akward, since you would have a huge double height balcony with doric columns for a small appartment, but it seemed like a good way to reuse the area.

 
At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:40:00 AM, Anonymous sideofwisdom said...

The same thing is happening in Skokie where I grew up because there is an ordincane that 50% of the property must be open. They are tearing down houses everytime I go home to visit. It's just awful the houses they build now. Btw have you seen what they have done to the old Jane Addams Center on Broadway in Chicago--it is a trainwreck.

 
At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:55:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your post today brought to mind the effort in places like Flint to integrate lots on which abandoned houses have been torn down in blighted neighborhoods by selling them to adjoning property owners. Aesthetically, I have the same reaction - whether in a nice suburb or a blighted one - it still looks like a hole in the streetscape most of the time.

 
At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:03:00 PM, Blogger hoopla said...

I don't see a "mansion". Have we gotten to the point that any new replacement house is called a "McMansion"? It's a huge distraction from the point you're trying to make.

Certainly less density per acre is not the way we want to go.

 
At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 11:16:00 PM, Blogger aaron said...

At least they bought the house next door and left yard.

Take a tour around Hinsdale or Burr Ridge. There the tear downs are being built to cover almost all the lot.

 
At Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:03:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Thanks for the comments, everybody.

sideofwisdom - Don't know if I've seen the Jane Addams Center. Old or new building? Any images?

trevor - Good point. I wonder if that applies if they build a gazebo or some other sort of semi-habitable structure?

cesar - Yep, more density requires rezoning, but less only requires more money on the part of the owner.

hoopla - I'm saying the McMansion is the goal and this is a way for those to be built on smaller lots without them covering the whole lot (like aaron says) and not having that oh so desirable lawn. This is a speculation on what might happen, not on what's currently there.

 
At Friday, November 30, 2007 3:08:00 AM, Blogger Norman Blogster said...

I agree with Alan Coren that the word "suburbia" should be replaced by the word "peripolitania" (from the Greek peri = around, polis = city) because suburbia implies a substandard urbia. However, it's where the vast majority of our population (86% in the UK) live but where architects rarely design for or study. Please join me in rebranding this important but ignored part of our built environment so that it gets the attention it deserves!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, November 27, 2007


Spertus, originally uploaded by archidose.

The Spertus Institute of Jewish Studies in Chicago, Illinois by Krueck + Sexton Architects. The building opens officially on November 30.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

1 Comments:

At Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:29:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Spectacular spaces for the new Spertus Inst.of Jewish studies by Krueck and Sexton.
But considering Jews;the Bible states in Romans 2:28,29 that a Jew is not one outwardly of the flesh,but inwardly of the heart(circumcised in the heart),in the spirit whose praise is not of men but of God!
wilson
wilson@nitt.edu

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Another year, another Thanksgiving break. Posts will resume on Monday or Tuesday next week.

Missing image - macys.jpg
Image found here

1 Comments:

At Wednesday, November 21, 2007 7:23:00 PM, Blogger Tawnia said...

My sister's blogspot led me here...where I will stay for awhile!
Her blogspot is: theKnittingArchitect.blogspot.com
Do you know her?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, November 19, 2007

My weekly page update:
image03sm.jpg
The Boxwood Winery in Middleburg, Virginia by Hugh Newell Jacobsen.

The updated book feature is Crabgrass Frontier, by Kenneth T. Jackson and Redesigning the American Dream, by Dolores Hayden.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Art is Everywhere
A blog about making art and seeking the beautiful in our surroundings. (added to sidebar under blogs::art)

Normal Room
A "home for global homes, wonderful lifestyles and fabulous interior design."

The Think Tank
that has yet to be named.

3 Comments:

At Monday, November 19, 2007 4:59:00 AM, Blogger Victoria said...

My mom lives in Middleburg. It's a really really nice place =)

 
At Monday, November 19, 2007 6:44:00 AM, Blogger Forgotten said...

Discover little known elements of Chicago’s built environment. Forgotten Chicago is a new website dedicated to documenting little known elements of Chicago’s infrastructure, architecture, neighborhoods and general cityscape, whether existing or historical.

http://www.forgottenchicago.com

 
At Monday, November 19, 2007 3:48:00 PM, Blogger Andrew said...

Reminds me of Kahn's pool house in New Jersey.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, November 18, 2007

By my count about 100 people gathered yesterday in Cooper Union's column-filled Great Hall to attend New York 2030: New York's Green Future, a public discussion among the authors of Mayor Bloomberg's PlaNYC and a panel of urban design experts, organized by the Institute for Urban Design.

The morning was reserved for the "authors" of the plan, who gave Power Point presentations on the goals of PlaNYC, its various elements (parks, transportation, water, housing), and some inspirations for moving forward with the plan. What came across as the strongest point to me was that the plan is predicated on growth, specifically the addition of one million more people by 2030. While this point has been apparent since day one, a questioning of that growth -- and the basing of a sustainable plan around growth, as opposed to sustainability for its own sake and for quality of life -- was what I took from the discussion. Given the short time left in the current administration, and the longterm nature of PlaNYC, one must wonder what will be its future if it is seen that the population does not grow by one million, or in fact shrinks over that same projected time?

The explicit statement that all the elements of the plan follow from the growth premise is equally unsettling, as if to say that parks and housing cannot follow from anything but growth and that current residents aren't considerations. To think that approximately 85% of the context for the plan currently exists, what happens to this physical and social context is not clear. It's as if adding parks and housing will solve the problem, which the mayor is defining as dealing with an influx of one million people, a population yet to be defined in any way.

2030.jpg

The afternoon session was a response to the morning presentation, comprised of academics and leaders of community organizations. The short talks were primarily critical of the plan, from its ignorance of the city's typical democratic, decision-making process to its lack of creativity, and learning from other cities, in dealing with transportation issues. The only non-New Yorker of the bunch, sociologist Richard Sennett, questioned the ability of a sustainable plan towards problems of social inequality and isolation, two traits he finds in global cities today.

Unfortunately members of the audience did not follow Michael Sorkin's plea for succinct questions directed at particular members of the panel; instead individuals used the opportunity as a platform for their own ramblings on issues sometimes only marginally related to the topic at hand, or even to hurl insults. It was unfortunate, as the preceding presentations -- both by city officials and "rebukers" -- were informative and varied in their points of view, enabling those in audience to come away with not only a new way of thinking about things, but a sense of how to deal with what the future brings as the plan is adopted and implemented.

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:28:00 AM, Blogger Rex said...

Real and imagined unknowns are part of our embedded information society, but the big picture keeps getting bigger. One of them is in 2030 talk about how and why New York City keeps secrets. It is the stuff of its greatness.

Despite the call for transparency and a more open society, government officials, business leaders, and human rights advocates share the mantra of the bull rider that says, don’t get killed the moment the gate opens.
Thus, the preference for advanced knowledge includes knowing that it will throw you off regardless.

There are many ways to look at an idea though; you can bring in advisors, experts, consultants to test the bull for weaknesses and its moves. The example given here reflects on the experience of the advisory council used for the 2030 PlaNYC.gov project. They were asked to hear it first, keep it quiet, and begin to prepare their respective constituencies with ideas about changing the city to solve problems, meet needs, or produce higher levels of confidence. Knowing or unknowingly they have entered New York’s version of a time honored practice known as the “run from the bulls”.

The advocates gathered by the intensity and tenacity of Ann Ferebee covered community planning, housing specialists, environmental activists, business and labor leaders, could not hear one another as they all have their own bull to ride or dodge. They also have some foreknowledge about successful placement within the arena, as part of the running crowd or on a balcony above the fray. The hidden message is lead or getting out of the way in a world that no longer accepts leaders.

Whether the 2030 Plan gets called the Olympic plan in a green dress, the World’s Greatest Bull ride, or the NYC version of the San Fermin Festival in Pamplona, every resident should be encouraged by a single truth in a simple cup. The solution to the global challenge is urban. The real problem is not more people, but why the urbanists have seem to have gone quite mad. I suspect I know why as well as they do after. Raw unspeakable fear.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, November 17, 2007

"At American's outposts, with places like Chili's pumping out its exhaust in one area and Burger King belching its tallow-scented smoke down the street, the place certainly does smell like America. I was struck by how both men [at Camp Carroll in South Korea] referred to the idea of Westerners, as people, standing out, but were not too concerned about the bases standing out, as they do when someone flies over them or walks by them and peers in the chain link fence. When I mentioned this, [civilian Dean] Jackson said, 'But sometimes we build with a local influence.' Colonel [Wayne] Kennedy reacted strongly to this suggestion, stating forcefully, 'But it's absolutely just a façade -- the inside is still American.' Here is a senior Army officer, trained as a logistician, who sees through the veneers of compatibility. Whether in Italy, Japan, or South Korea, planning that stops with sloped tile roofs and stucco walls does not make a place compatible. But the American style seems to be spreading to the local area. Jackson commented that he has noticed more Western-style housing going up: single-family homes with big yards and two-car garages. It seems local residents are learning from the planning patterns of the military."
- Mark L. Gillem, from America Town (2007).

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, November 16, 2007

Just a quick note on Jean Nouvel's latest design for Manhattan, a new 75-story tower for a site next to the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in Midtown. Nicolai Ouroussoff asks, "How did a profit-driven developer become more adventurous architecturally than MoMA, which has tended to make cautious choices in recent years?"

nouvel-moma.jpg

He answers his own question in with:
Hines [who MoMA sold the site to] asked Mr. Nouvel to come up with two possible designs for the site. A decade ago anyone who was about to invest hundreds of millions on a building would inevitably have chosen the more conservative of the two. But times have changed. Architecture is a form of marketing now, and Hines made the bolder choice.
(via Archinect)

3 Comments:

At Friday, November 16, 2007 11:57:00 AM, Anonymous thomas said...

some more images at http://www.dezeen.com/2007/11/16/53-west-53rd-street-by-jean-nouvel

 
At Friday, November 16, 2007 12:28:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

that building is one hot mess, I love it.

 
At Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:29:00 PM, Blogger Rafael said...

That building "has no genuine advantages, except in speculative gains for banks and land owners. It is not cheaper, it does not help create open space, it destroys the cityscape, it destroys social life, it promotes crime, it makes life difficult for children, it is expensive to maintain , it wrecks the open spaces near it, and it damages light air and view. But quite apart from all of this, which shows that it isn't very sensible, empirical evidence shows that it can actually damage people's minds and feelings.", you superficial virii.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home


IIT Entry Across, originally uploaded by ken mccown.

The McCormick Tribune Campus Center at the Illinois Institute (IIT) of Technology by Rem Koolhaas/OMA. Be sure to check out Ken McCown's flickr set for more quality pics of the IIT building.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, November 15, 2007

"Reduction is always risky, but [Alvaro] Siza's observations [on his working process] could be simplified in this manner:

place: origin of all architecture."
Leça, Piscinas. Álvaro Siza
"distance: provided by the fact that it's others who build."

"discussion: pay attention to those who will be using the building."
Porto, Vivendas Sociais SAAL. Álvaro Siza
"contingency: the solutions to the specific problems of each job are to be found in the conflicts that accompany the reality of the context of the work."
coastal dining
"uncertainty: thanks to the vagueness of the goal being pursued at the start of the job. The reaction is not resignation. On the contrary, that all well-done jobs end in surprise is a source of satisfaction."
Porto, FAUP. Álvaro Siza
"mediation: architecture as something that calls for group work, accepting one's limitations (constructive, functional, legal, etc.), sacrificing direct personal expression."
Piscinas Leça-8529.jpg
"nonsatisfaction: every architectural work is, in the eyes of its architect, unfinished; the architect necessarily feels that his solution failed to resolve all the conflicts inherent in the surrounding reality."
bonjour tristesse
"evidence: architecture as the opportunity to test the uniqueness of things, the uniqueness that in their evidence allows us to discern their very essence."
Rafael Moneo, from Theoretical Anxiety and Design Strategies in the Work of Eight Contemporary Architects (2004)

Photos, from top to bottom (all projects in Portugal, unless noted otherwise):
:: Swimming Pool in Leça da Palmeira (1966) by z.z.
:: Llobregat Sports Complex in Barcelona, Spain (2006) by tiagotchi
:: Social Housing in Saal da Bouça (1977) by z.z.
:: Boa Nova Restaurant in Leça da Palmeira (1963) by andrewpaulcarr
:: School of Architecture in Porto (1996) by z.z.
:: Swimming Pool in Leça da Palmeira (1966) by olotini
:: "Bonjour Tristesse" in Berlin, Germany (1984) by dianavieira

All photos grabbed from the archidose Flickr pool.

Labels:

2 Comments:

At Thursday, November 15, 2007 2:49:00 PM, Blogger Fernando said...

one of the greatest architects alive

 
At Thursday, November 15, 2007 10:16:00 PM, Anonymous epochedifice said...

The tea house (the forth image) is exquisite, on my list of 10 favorite buildings I have ever experienced. If you visit O’Porto, one of my favorite cities, you can walk from the tea house to his seaside pool (first iamge) with a glass (or bottle) of Port, one of my favorite drinks. Then one can peruse the rest of the city and wander into dozens of Siza projects.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, November 14, 2007


Villa Bio, originally uploaded by jmtp.

Villa Bio in Llers, Spain by Enric Ruiz Geli.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

2 Comments:

At Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:17:00 PM, Blogger na said...

John... more info here... > 'noticias arquitectura'

best!

Alejandro

 
At Wednesday, November 14, 2007 8:09:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Thanks, Alejandro. Always one step ahead of me!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

One of the recipients of this year's AIA Seattle Honor Awards is the aptly-named Rolling Huts by the critic's darlings, Olson Sundberg Kundig Allen Architects.

HD39a.jpg

The firm's embrace and occasional forays into the industrial is clearly evident here, with their steel wheels, frame and less-than-polished surfaces.

HD39b.jpg

The architects responded to local restrictions that restricted cabins (a building "type" this office appears to produce almost constantly), "hit[ting] upon the idea of placing the structures on wheels, effectively making the huts into RVs."

HD39c.jpg

AIA Seattle praised the project for its playfulness, "a willingness to question local idiomatic practice, [and being] raw, edgy, unafraid of the challenging aspects of nature." The local organization hits on the idea that "the user cannot escape the fact that the buildings impose on the landscape, with their steel wheels and tentative siting. These simple structures engage the spiritual question of our place in the landscape."

HD39d.jpg

Nevertheless the interiors are finished in an apparently minimal, clean, and well-appointed manner that makes the experience less than "roughing it," as one might expect from the notion of a hard-edged, industrial-like cabin on steel wheels.

HD39e.jpg

Links:
:: Olson Sundberg Kundig Allen Architects
:: AIA Seattle Honor Awards (Rolling Huts image gallery)

Labels:

8 Comments:

At Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:44:00 PM, Blogger hoopla said...

The first point of failure with these will be the concave joint in the roof. Rot will set in and they'll be in the dump in few years. Neat looking, though!

 
At Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:17:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

These definately owe something to Hedjuk's Masques.

 
At Wednesday, November 14, 2007 7:17:00 AM, Anonymous seier+seier said...

help me understand this, j.h.

did they find a way of building in an area where building was restricted? are we celebrating that?

I probably got this wrong

 
At Wednesday, November 14, 2007 7:50:00 AM, Blogger John said...

hoopla - I'm guessing the concave joint has a gutter and sheds water to the side, so rot might not be an issue...for the near future, at least.

seier+seier - You have a good point, though from the appearance of the site in the photos -- a large clearing with lots and lots of dirt -- I'm not sure why there is a restriction on the immediate site. But if that site condition was a product of the construction of these cabins -- a condition that the restriction would probably be intended to avoid -- then that's another thing, a problem to be sure. While I'm aware of site selection as an important part of sustainable architecture and planning, these huts have the advantage of "treading lightly" on the land they occupy. It's a difficult issue that I can only touch upon here, and is one complicated if we bring in the ethics of architects. The house in the photo of the second-to-last photo illustrates what is a more typical and harmful approach, of inserting a large residence in a sensitive area. How these two relate is a good thing to consider.

 
At Wednesday, November 14, 2007 4:01:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

These look nice, but if you look closely (and at the plans on the AIA link)there's no plumbing...the kitchenette has only a mini fridge and microwave. Don't people in the NW brush their teeth and use the toilet?

 
At Wednesday, November 14, 2007 8:07:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Anonymous - One need not look closely, as with the cabins raised it's more than apparent that there aren't any pipes. Where would the water come from? Where would it go?! I'm guessing that's why these are called cabins, because of a lack of plumbing and electricity...unless there's solar panels on the roof.

 
At Thursday, November 15, 2007 5:52:00 AM, Blogger Saline County, Arkansas Photos said...

The hut would make a great clubhouse for my son and his friends.

 
At Thursday, November 15, 2007 2:48:00 PM, Blogger Michelle Linden said...

If I remember correctly from the AIA awards, these cabins are to be used for overnight visitors to the owners own much larger cabin. I'm sure that anyone staying in these cabins can handle the lack of plumbing when there is a house quite near by.

I think the point of failure is actually going to be the wheels. They don't technically operate, and even if they did... a few wet springs and they'll have sunk too far into the mud to ever move again!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, November 12, 2007

My weekly page update:
image02sm.jpg
Park East Synagogue in Pepper Pike, Ohio by Centerbrook Architects and Planners.

The updated book feature is The Production of Space, by Henri Lefebvre, translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Human-Assisted Design
A blog "related to the following areas: algorithm-generated design, generative design, evolutionary design, genetic algorithms, sustainable building construction." (added to sidebar under blogs::design+technology)

Architecture: the good the bad and the ugly
A "community of architectural critiques...a virtual roundtable where everyone, around the world interested in architecture, can express there opinion." (added to sidebar under architectural links::forums)

World Planning Day
Oops. Missed it.

M.I.T. Sues Architect Frank Gehry
Missed this one, too.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, November 11, 2007


New Museum, originally uploaded by archidose.

The New Museum of Contemporary Art by SANAA in New York City, opening on the first of December.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

5 Comments:

At Monday, November 12, 2007 1:32:00 AM, Blogger Brendan said...

Can't quite say why, but I find this building to be mildly disturbing...

 
At Monday, November 12, 2007 8:35:00 AM, Blogger Victor said...

I like it! But I like almost everything Sanaa does... but this one, it's almost as if they went along the first model they made.

Hey, John, what happens at night? Is the building translucent?

Thanks!

 
At Monday, November 12, 2007 12:44:00 PM, Blogger Joe said...

Ha! It looks like they are poking fun at New York's 'wedding cake' zoning tendencies at the client's expense.

 
At Monday, November 12, 2007 8:41:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Victor - Nope, it's opaque, minus the various (primarily small) windows. See the flickr set of the building for more views.

 
At Wednesday, November 14, 2007 6:58:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

the "stacked boxes" type seems to be the trendy form at the moment...

this is a little too bland for my liking, personally

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, November 10, 2007

It's been a while since I've posted about something blobby -- for lack of a better term -- so when this "design research project on generative, computational form finding" by MRGD (pronounced emerged) landed in my inbox I couldn't resist.

mrgd1.jpg

Urban Lobby is the 2006 Architectural Association thesis project of Melike Altinisik (Turkey), Samer Chamoun (Lebanon) and Daniel Widrig (Germany). In it they investigate "the potential of fuzzy logic as a loose-fit organizational technique for developing intelligent, flexible and adaptive environments."

mrgd2.jpg

The project looks at the urban lobby as a contested and negotiated transient space, between public and private, work and home, transit and statis, etc. Interestingly, the team approaches their design by using an existing 1970s office tower (Centre Point) in London as the starting point for the new lobby, an apparent appendage that links the building to its context while infiltrating the existing at levels higher than the typical lobby's reach.

mrgd3.jpg

This sort of project is more about its process than its result. While images of the latter tend to be the focus in both print and online publications, the former should be stressed, as the form emerges from the process. While the description of the process on MRGD's web site is rather complex, the image below helps to explain one aspect of it: an investigation of the "self organizing behavior of the hair system." A number of variables were manipulated with a computer (of course) to derive images that could then be analyzed as potential formal processes for the lobby design.

mrgd4.jpg

It's well worth visiting the project web page to see the various animations and still images of the design's process and "final" form. It's a very thorough documentation of the project, aided in part by the computer's ability to generate images, but more so the team's drive towards generating "innovative works of architecture with an important urban, social and cultural effects."

mrgd5.jpg

While the project aims to break ground via the use of the computer in the design process, the team concludes by discussing beauty, specifically beauty vs. elegance. They say, "Both are quite different concepts. One is either beautiful or not. Technique comes to play its major role to transform what is considered not beautiful to beautiful similar to plastic surgery. It allows us to push towards beauty by producing elegance. Elegance is therefore achieved as kind of problem solving process, an ability to articulate complexity, and multiple agendas into a resolution."

mrgd6.jpg

Thanks to Daniel for bringing the project to my attention and supplying some images for this post.

12 Comments:

At Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:16:00 PM, Blogger Joe said...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I get the impression that this is predominantly an exercise in form generation. If it is, and if this reflects a branch in the future development of architecture, I see it as something that has a high potential of being misused as a way of promoting formally interesting, but otherwise very mediocre projects. I do not know if this way of using something like Generative Components is a positive development.

Also, I cannot take a name like MRGD seriously. It's a little pompous.

 
At Sunday, November 11, 2007 7:10:00 AM, Blogger Rafael said...

"While the description of the process on MRGD's web site is rather complex..."

I would not characterize it as complex, it is rather obfuscated, but if you read-in carefully you will find, as I just did, that it just obscures the fact that they don't have a clue about what they're talking about.

From the project's site:

"Each of these material machines was devised so that through numerous interactions among its elements over a given time span, the machine restructures and finds form. Most of the machines consist of materials that can process forces by transformation. Since they are agents, it is essential that they have certain flexibility, a certain amount of freedom to act. It is also essential that this freedom is limited to a degree set by the structure of the machine itself. The wool thread machine was used to calculate the shape of city patterns, of cancellous bone structure but also of branching column systems. These are similar vectorized (sic) systems that economize on the number of paths, meaning they share geometry of merging and bifurcating."

Does anyone here disagree with me when I say this whole paragraph amounts to zero information?

These kids need to get it through their brains that playing with computers scripts someone else made, about which you do not understand the underlying mathematical theory does not entail developing generative architecture systems in any meaningful way.

Perhaps some of them should quit architecture school and study computer science instead. You don't need to go to architecture school to be a first-rate architect. And that's a fact.

On a related note:

"Of Buildings, Computers and Telescopes"

http://www.human-assisted.info/2007/11/of-buildings-computers-and-telescopes.html

 
At Sunday, November 11, 2007 8:30:00 AM, Blogger John said...

I guess one must ask if the final result could not have been generated via other means, though less in formal terms than in terms of the urban, social and cultural effects they embrace.

It's one thing to, say, plug the location of certain subway lines, activities within the building, good pubs nearby, and so forth into an algorithm and see what the computer spits out (when overlaid with formal processes generated via studying hair manipulation -- for whatever reason -- in this case), and another to respond to the same conditions without the help of a computer.

As I agree that the predominant means of using the computer these days is to generate new forms (ironically most of them kinda looking the same), here there seems to be an attempt to use the computer to find connections that impact not only form but the program (for lack of a more exact term, as the program of a lobby is rather imprecise), particularly via the complexity that the computer can muster.

The way the lobby seems to stretch out from the building via numerous spaghetti-like strands into its context seems to be generated via a system of this sort. (I shouldn't say too much, as I'm from the old-fashioned pencil and parallel bar school.) But if part of the solution could not have been accomplished with non-CPU means -- while I can't say for sure -- I'd guess they could be, though in a different form, of course.

 
At Sunday, November 11, 2007 9:15:00 AM, Blogger Rafael said...

I have little doubt that these forms could be generated by "non-CPU" means. Perhaps, the more pressing question would be, what advantage would "old-fashioned" pencil and parallel design bring into the table?

I'm thinking about Alexander's [human-assisted.info] ideas when I ask this. I genuinely wish to know what you guys think.

Regarding the "sameness" of current computer generated form, I believe it is a reflection of the lack of sophistication of the wielders of the tools. On the other hand, I see a similar "sameness" between the work of the more salient exponents of the different non-computer-generated styles in history.

I believe innovation in form is reaching a dead-end and is about to become a commodity that's better handled by a computer. Perhaps it's time to think about other intellectual pursuits, "higher-games", so to speak. To quote The Super Furry Animals: "Every building has been built".

You tell me.

 
At Sunday, November 11, 2007 8:43:00 PM, Blogger Joe said...

I really don't see how any sort of functional program was used to derive the geometry of the product, and the number of iterations, as well as the somewhat arbitrary manipulation of certain parameters (where the hell did the 10m x 10m grid come from?), suggests to me that the solution arrived at could be arrived at by screwing around with any media subject to any sort of parameters.

I would say that starting off the design path on a dynamics engine in Maya, of all things, is not a good idea. What work have they done to rule out the appropriateness of the dynamics engine of some other software, say Houdini, for this particular project? The particle-to-fluid-surface effect in Houdini's pretty damn cool, and is equally open to being screwed around with.

I have to agree with Raphael. I really don't see this team from AA actually getting down and dirty with scripting language in order to develop a solver algorithm that is unique and totally appropriate to the contextual information.

Projects in this vein only reaffirm my respect for architects like Glenn Murcutt. We all know what kind of dynamics engine he runs with.

 
At Sunday, November 11, 2007 9:12:00 PM, Anonymous Joe said...

Just to correct myself. The 10m x 10m grid came from Centre Point. My question is how did they decide that grid is appropriate for the entire site and the context?

 
At