tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6531343.post7423732051053820149..comments2024-03-29T04:41:47.761-04:00Comments on A Weekly Dose of Architecture Books: The Post Is Hating Contemporary ArchitectureJohn Hillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14842328320680692310noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6531343.post-57831428214222030392014-08-06T04:44:51.271-04:002014-08-06T04:44:51.271-04:00I think it's safe to say that starchitects are...I think it's safe to say that starchitects are commissioned for their flamboyant designs and bling. It's also safe to say that, for the most part, starchitects are given carte-blanche on the design and their clients are willing to pay big $$ for it.<br /><br />Generally, there is nothing wrong with starchitecture. In fact, I believe many starchitects work to a much higher standard than most, and in doing so, have scrutinised and pushed many boundaries and even created many new boundaries which have improved, inspired & created the exciting global contemporary architecture we experience today. <br /><br />If we view or review starchitecture with a critical eye and look beyond the bling, it would reveal that a lot of the work have made significant positive contributions to the advancement of contemporary architecture, and therefore, the built environment.<br /><br />Don't crucify ALL starchitects and starchitecture because of the failings of the misguided few. The world would be a dull sea of 'square boxes' that might not necessarily be a better response to context, nor an improvement to the built environment and the communities that inhabit them.<br /><br />That said, and to bring some perspective to this, there is no place for starchitecture in poor developing countries struggling to provide their communities with the fundamental essentials of basic shelter and services. This is such a complex issue that goes well beyond architecture. It's a political, socio-economical, cultural, environmental, human rights issue. <br /><br />If such a country neglects and deprives its citizens of basic rights, and chooses to use their resources to commission starchitects and build starchitecture, does it become the moral and ethical responsibility of the starchitect to decline such a commission??<br />bnh_bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13054430502343477503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6531343.post-18358258036821726372014-08-06T01:38:13.239-04:002014-08-06T01:38:13.239-04:00The comments on the hit peace that Mr. Cuozzo made...The comments on the hit peace that Mr. Cuozzo made in the NY Post are unfortunate. They are echoes of those critics that Mr. Eiffel had to endure before the inauguration of the Eiffel tower (http://www.toureiffel.paris/en/everything-about-the-tower/themed-files/71.html ) . Now , it is impossible to imagine Paris without it's tower. The same could be said about Antony Gaudi's Casa Mila (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casa_Mil%C3%A0) in Barcelona. The architect suffered innumerable criticism from the public and the media of the time. Today this landmark is visited by many tourist and locals. The comments of Mr. Cuozzo are destined to be in the back burner of history. This is just typical<br />tabloid format reporting.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6531343.post-16629571207307219322014-08-05T14:47:45.590-04:002014-08-05T14:47:45.590-04:00Operation and maintenance are issues that ALL arch...Operation and maintenance are issues that ALL architects should address, regardless of name, form, etc. Other architects probably don't need to do so in the media, but the idea of wiping one's hands clean after moving-in day leads to buildings that don't perform optimally in various respects.<br /><br />But I'm curious if their buildings REALLY cost more to operate and maintain, particularly relative to something like the 9/11 Museum, which is more conservative in its form but is probably just as expensive to deal with after its completion. Yes, curvy and skeletal forms are more difficult to construct for the time being, but are the architects solely to blame? Or should the discussion also include the client, the contractor and others that partake in the decision to build a particular design and how to do so?John Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14842328320680692310noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6531343.post-34975834715337362682014-08-05T13:04:56.207-04:002014-08-05T13:04:56.207-04:00I think The Post's critique reflects many of t...I think The Post's critique reflects many of their readership's opinions; that contemporary high-profile architecture is obsessed with obscure formal concepts that don't serve the public welfare. I also think people's gut reaction embodies a lot of accurate, if tacit, knowledge about the durability and serviceability of structures. Even if it were built on-budget, the Calatrasaurus will be very expensive to operate and maintain, or will fall apart quickly. These are issues Gehry and Calatrava ought to address directly regardless of the quality of the critic's writing.samhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06046708319290105670noreply@blogger.com