Tuesday, October 30, 2007

A couple years ago I posted briefly about Ponte City, a 1970s high-rise with a distinct cylindrical shape and hollow core. Located in Johannesburg, South Africa, the building is undergoing a transformation from...

ponte.jpg

to...

ponte1.jpg

Yes folks, it's New Ponte! While gussying up the concrete core with color and some balconies does little to betray the building's qualities, the exterior rendering below resembles a mediocre development in Chicago, New York, Vancouver, or some other North American city. The design and the marketing make me wonder how much else the South African development borrows from American precedents. From a brief look at New Ponte's web page, it looks like a lot, from the amenities package to the focus on "luxury" living and open floor plans.

ponte2.jpg

Given the fact that Ponte City was a rough and tumble place that happened to have a unique design, the transformation is impossible to dismiss outright, though I'd contend that a development geared at a mix of incomes rather than solely the upper classes might make the transformation less contentious. But given the great swing of (social) change envisioned, architecture is just one piece of the puzzle.

What struck me as perhaps the most important (and unsettling) element in this transformation is the project's "urban renewal." While it's not clear if Johannesburg had the below charter pre-New Ponte, or if it was created with the input of developers to help these and other potential urban-renewal projects, the security element of the charter below appears to be another unfortunate extension of the American influence hypothesized above.

As the web page indicates: "The City of Johannesburg is committed to developing the Inner City as a place where people want to live. The Inner City Regeneration Charter commits the City to the following:
:: Highly Visible ‘bobby-on-the-beat’ system, by increasing resources to the South African Police Services, and the Johannesburg Municipal Police Department over the next three years.
:: Install 216 CCTV cameras in and around the Inner City, connected to a control center manned 24 hours a day by JMPD and SAPS.
:: Zero-tolerance to law-enforcement, including all by-laws.
:: Injecting R99-million into Pikitup in the 2007/8 financial year to build a new system of waste management and street cleaning in the Inner City.
:: Eliminate all Bad Buildings in the Inner City.
:: Eliminate all unlicensed and non-compliant liquor outlets by the end of 2009.
:: Upgrade all the city streets for pedestrians, through new paving, planting street trees, replacing and putting in new lighting, cleaning up litter etc."
[PDF link]
(Thanks to Juliet for the head's up!)

1 Comments:

At Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:45:00 PM, Anonymous Joe said...

I like the, "eliminate all Bad Buildings" clause in the charter. Obviously put in there to only serve as icing.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Mock-up of the rooftop louvers for the Art Institute of Chicago addition by Renzo Piano Building Workshop.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

2 Comments:

At Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:37:00 AM, Anonymous iaakuza said...

Beautiful! Renzo Piano rocks!

 
At Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:01:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It looks like something from Ronco.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, October 29, 2007

My weekly page update:
image04sm.jpg
Courtyard House in Los Angeles by Ripple Design.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
designverb
"Designverb covers elements in design that excite, inspire, captivate, and rattle our goofy creative minds through curious and refreshing finds in art, design, technology, food, culture, experiences, lifestyles, entertainment, and all the other mind-provoking ideas that come with it!" (added to sidebar under blogs::design+technology)

AndrewBlum.net
A collection of articles on architecture, urbanism, design, art, technology and travel from a contributing editor at Wired and Metropolis magazines. (added to sidebar under architectural links::criticism)

Photography of the Unexpected and the Neglected Architecture
A work by Yves Marchand & Romain Meffre.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, October 28, 2007

The following text and images are courtesy vision division, a young Swedish architecture firm with a penchant for the clever.

"If you want to build something in Sweden, you have to neglect your architectural aspirations and desires, and build something comprehensible and conventional to please the Swedish building regulations with their obsessed traditional values."

HD38a.jpg

"So at a first glance this sauna may appear to be an anonymous wooden cabin, with no architectural features or ambition. The front façade is windowless; a water proof drape covers the façade on the other side. The sauna has a pointed traditional roof as well, to accomplish this intriguing scam."

HD38b.jpg

"The front façade is actually a door, and when it is opened, the cabin changes its appearance completely."

HD38c.jpg

"Now you have a magnificent view over the archipelago, and the door/wall creates an intimate space with the guest hut next to the sauna."

HD38d.jpg

"The wall prevents the neighbors from peaking in as well."

HD38e.jpg

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Part of the Urban Design program at City College last year was a class on the anthropology of space and place. Taught by Setha Low -- whose books I reviewed here and here -- the class was equal parts theory and practice; readings about the subject followed by research and field observations for a public space in the city. The team of which I was a part looked at Jacob Javits Plaza in Lower Manhattan's Civic Center area. Designed by Martha Schwartz, the plaza is known as being the site of Richard Serra's Tilted Arc, a curved wall of cor-ten steel that bisected the space and was removed only eight years after its supposedly permanent installation.

I'd written critically about the plaza design in the past, though this class gave me the opportunity to look at the success (or lack thereof) of the design from the point of view of use, in relation to design. This weekend I decided to reformat the final paper for the web and post it on my web site. So I give you Jacob Javits Plaza: Reconsidering Intentions. It's a fairly long paper, but one I'm particularly proud of. If you make it through it all, hopefully you'll find it worth your while.

javits.jpg

An abstract of the paper might read:
This paper attempts to determine the success of Jacob Javits Plaza through the framework of the current design's historical relationship to what came before, via a historical analysis, a three-part mapping analysis of the space (seating population, movement, and use), and using internet “discussions” about perceptions of the space and the plaza design. These analyses follow histories of the Federal buildings that created the plaza; the selection, installation, and removal of Serra’s sculpture; the “in-between” period when temporary planters and furniture occupied the space; and the selection, installation, and reaction to Schwartz’s plaza redesign.

2 Comments:

At Monday, November 05, 2007 10:32:00 AM, Blogger rira said...

amazing, with two consecutive posts (this and the sauna) you just helped me enormously with two imminent deadlines
always a source of inspiration and information

 
At Monday, November 05, 2007 7:33:00 PM, Blogger John said...

While I can only imagine how I helped, and with what exactly, I'm pleased nevertheless. Thanks.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, October 26, 2007

Ordrupgaard Museum Extension in Copenhagen, Denmark by Zaha Hadid.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

On the left is a (modified) aerial of Kramer Junction (Google Earth link) solar electric generating station in Southern California; on the right is an aerial of Central Park (GE link, again) in Manhattan.

kramer-centralpark.jpg

According to Nova's "Saved by the Sun," Kramer Junction powers approximately 150,000 homes, or the equivalent of just under two Central Parks at Manhattan's population density of 66,940 people per square mile. Or to put it another way, turning Central Park into a solar electric generating station, like Kramer Junction (assuming, magically, the same solar conditions as the Mojave Desert), would power approximately 8-10% of Manhattan's households. While I don't think this comparison deflates the solar potential, it helps illustrate the enormous areas required, with current technologies, to achieve a more suitable way of creating energy than burning fossil fuels. Of course, this comparison also ignores demand (what I see as a -- if not the -- key to the current energy "crisis"), in which case the 150,000 might actually increase in Manhattan's denser and more compact living conditions.

9 Comments:

At Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:40:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

the comparison also ignores the fact that these solar power generating station is located in a desert or remote area, not in a city and definitely not in a forest.

Either we go nuclear or solar, burning coal and oil for energy is really bad for planet earth and the environment.

Calvin
blog.miragestudio7.com

 
At Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:45:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Though the show was favoring the solar solution (with a brief mention of wind), don't forget geothermal & ocean wave energy are solutions too.

Also, PV's are used in urban areas like Rafael Moneo who did a project using solar panels on the side of a bldg (featured on this blog). Also, as the show mentioned there were installations on the roof of a Whole Foods.

Despite making the guy who was critical about the governments lack of involvment out to be the token critical voice, the show conspicuously slipped past the question altogether. Why hasn't the US done more, (he innocently asked)? I think we all know the answer to this one. There was also a subtle "oh, it's just technology that's holding us back" sort of attitude.

 
At Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:47:00 PM, Anonymous sideofwisdom said...

I think we should just stop dilly dallying and go for the Dyson Sphere. Make no small plans!

 
At Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:09:00 PM, Anonymous will said...

i am not sure i get the point. is it that solar takes up space so is not feasible? let's not forget all the roof space available in every city on this planet.

out of curiosity how large is a coal fired plant or a hydro plant? my guess is they are even larger.

my suspicion is that the real issue we are facing is cost. wihtout government involvement as in germany, the market has a hard time competing. that example of the pv on the roof of a supermarket seems great, but if there were really money in it many more people would be doing it. investors are not stupid, nor are they biased against non-traditional energy sources. but they are cautious. few serious energy specialists are silly enough to forget that in the energy markets it is usually the early-bird who loses his fortune (historically that was the case)...so i am guessing it is more a matter fo time and more people trying lots of different things that will eventually lead to a significant change in our energy production patterns. that is the way the market works, and apparently the us govt thinks that is fine. too bad, eh.

 
At Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:32:00 PM, Anonymous SteveO said...

just read that Iraq + Afghanistan will cost the US 2.4 trillion by 2017. Imagine (Lennon reference intentional) a world where 2.4 trillion was invested in alternative energies. Heck! Even half that amount and a lesser deficit would be a bold step.

 
At Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:27:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Echoing the sentiment of a previous comment: the more useful comparison seems like "if we put solar panels on the roof of every building in New York City, how much of NYC would they power?" Or, more to the point, "would they power the building they top"? Throw in panels down the sides of buildings (windows overrated), and you could certainly cover the need.

 
At Sunday, October 28, 2007 10:05:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Calvin - Yes, the comparison ignores location, though that was addressed by my "magical conditions" comment. Regardless, I don't think the solution is simply a matter of switching resources, though I would always lean towards renewable ones versus finite ones.

anon - I must admit I came into the show late, so missed most of it, so you comment is helpful. The project I think you're talking about is by Pugh+Scarpa and not Moneo, the Colorado Court apartments in Santa Monica, featured on my weekly page four years ago. To now consider location, using the sides of buildings in New York City is not as beneficial as Santa Monica. It would make a statement to be sure, but it would be surfaces mostly likely in shadow by nearby buildings and a lot of money for little return.

sideofwisdom - Why stop at the Sphere?

will - I'm not making any assertions as to feasibility, rather I'm just showing the coverage required in what can be considered ideal conditions to power a small city or large suburb, in relation to the largest city in the United States. It's open to interpretation, and your comments on the sizes of fossil-fueled power plants (I'll try to find a similarly-scaled image to compare) and roof space being used for solar are really good ones. Of course, roofs in Manhattan would face the same restrictions as facades, mentioned in my response to anon above, and large solar plants would face the same NIMBY response as other plants; even wind farms are facing the same opposition, as is the case of one off the shore of Long Island that was stopped by residents who don't want their view spoiled. But what I take from your comment is the value of power sources at a variety of scales, from large plants to small, residential units, ultimately working together in some manner. And while I'm a bit uneducated on the matter, the thought of the market dictating energy production seems a bit misguided, though I don't see any US-gov't intervention, a la Germany, any time in the near future.

SteveO - I had a dream where GW Bush completely re-oriented the US economy from war-spending to making the country sustainable (for lack of a better term), making the US an example for the world and the growing number of developing nations that follow this country's lead, for better or worse...and in most cases both.

anon - My half-educated response to that question (from working on a LEED building in NYC that wished to do such a thing) is no. The coverage required to power lights, HVAC, water, and outlets would be much greater than the roof surface, and using them on the facade is more a statement than a practical application in the city. What typically happens is solar panels are used for one use, be it hot water, or lighting a certain zone of the building.

What these comments make me think about is the importance of architectural and urban design in lessening the energy required to, say, heat and cool a building, or power lights. For the scale of the solar required to replace a fossil fuel source, it's not just a matter of one replacing the other; it must be combined with decreased demand via good architecture, low-energy appliances and fixtures, and people aware of their role in this energy spectrum.

 
At Tuesday, November 06, 2007 3:09:00 PM, Blogger Dinomium said...

I think the comparison shows that solutions for energy need to be social changes as well. Centralized Solar Production looks like a failure if you try to apply it like a power plant, but imagine a subdivision in Orange county where every house is covered by PV and each neighborhood or community has its own mini grid.

Centralized power, water and sewage treatment is as big a part of the problem as the funding!

Near rant over.

 
At Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:56:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Manhattan’s density is unusual, so it may not offer a particularly useful perspective on whether solar power is viable. Does New York use the same amount of power as other urban areas? If not, then it would be more helpful to describe the relationship between the space used to generate solar electricity and the amount of power used by a community that is representative of national norms. Rather than offering the Central Park – Manhattan contrast, why not do the same for Central Park – Cleveland or St. Louis or Phoenix? We need to understand the relationship between a solar generation station and median density American cities or suburbs.

New York City does not often represent a logical or accurate point of comparison to the rest of the United States. Because the comparison is inapt, so too are any conclusions drawn from it.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, October 23, 2007


wave, originally uploaded by base_gee.

Block 16 in Almere, Netherlands by René van Zuuk Architekten.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Even without being the fan of Japanese super-duo Atelier Bow-Wow that I am, I still would have been blown away after perusing the drawings in their latest book, Graphic Anatomy, at a bookstore a couple weeks ago. The thorough mix of working drawing, perspective drawing, and entourage is a novel combination of well-established drawing conventions. They're beautiful in their own right.

anatomy0.jpg

While I resisted purchasing the book (how much longer I can, I'm not sure), it was great to find some super-large-scale images from the book on yusunkwon's Flickr page. Below are some strips from those images. Click the image to be taken to see the overall images, impressive even at a lower resolution. (For those not versed in navigating Flickr, click on the "all sizes" button above the image on the Flickr page to see the full, hi-res image.)

anatomy1.jpg

anatomy2.jpg

anatomy3.jpg

anatomy4.jpg

4 Comments:

At Friday, October 26, 2007 10:30:00 AM, Anonymous kevin said...

These are beautiful- perfect format for working with clients who have trouble pulling 2d drawings into their future 3d reality.....

 
At Saturday, October 27, 2007 4:03:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who are these drawings geared toward?

I find it odd that the client would request something like this. Typically 3d perspectives of the room are sufficient and more useful as these sections just show construction details and could confuse clients. If the client is interested or curious in how it works this makes sense like in the book series "How stuff works".

I could see if other architects are curious how the buildings are built it has a quasi-presentation / technical viewpoint.

From a purely architectural construction dwg standpoint (which is where I am coming from as a drafter) this is not standard practice and would be considered a waste of time.

 
At Saturday, October 27, 2007 9:30:00 PM, Blogger Joe said...

I suspect that they did this especially for the publication as a way to present projects both technically, as well as spatially and functionally. Perhaps this format is how they feel best represents their way of thinking, constantly kicking spatial, functional, and technical ideas back and forth in order to better account for the impact that one aspect as on another. Atelier Bow-Wow most likely deliberately chose not to include photographs in the presentation in order to better represent these drawings as schemes and ideas before realization, although it would be interesting to see orthographic drawings overlaid on photographs.

But this is only my speculation, since I've not read the book.

 
At Monday, October 29, 2007 3:49:00 AM, Anonymous Tia Martyn said...

Hi there, I am a drafter n work wid www.designpresentation.com
The drawings u posted online are just amazing, wht a transition from 2d to 3d!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, October 22, 2007

My weekly page update:
image02sm.jpg
Termas Géometricas in Villarrica, Chile by Germán del Sol.

The updated book feature is Building a Century of Progress: The Architecture of Chicago's 1933-34 World's Fair, by Lisa D. Schrenk.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
The Other City
An international exhibition in two venues (the Hungarian Cultural Center and the Romanian Cultural Insitute, both in New York) that "explores the ideologies behind the postwar initiatives of public housing projects, the conditions these buildings have provided for their inhabitants, as well as the agenda of those who support or criticize them." Running from Oct. 19 to Dec. 9.

Lebbeus Woods
New blog of the prolific, experimental architect, teacher, and artist. (added to sidebar under blogs::offices)

BMW Welt
This weekend saw the opening of Coop Himmelb(l)au's building for the German car maker. (via ecAr)

Top 100 Architecture Blogs
From out of nowhere comes this list of 100 blogs on architecture and urbanism, with a few new ones (to me) that will be added to this page's sidebar in the near future.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Yesterday saw the opening of the Nerman Museum of Contemporary Art in Overland Park, Kansas. Designed by Kyu Sung Woo Architects, the museum is a part of the Johnson County Community College and is built as an addition to the school's Regnier Center, giving the museum a prominent location on the campus's northeast corner.

HD37a.jpg

The view above shows the building apparently reaching out beyond the campus, to the community beyond, as a sort of symbolic connection between the two.

HD37b.jpg

According to the architect's web page, the museum "provides amenities for the entire campus. A café is provided in the atrium and a large multi purpose Lecture Hall serves the museum, campus educational needs, and has additional conferencing capabilities. Galleries are provided for both the permanent collections and for temporary and changing exhibitions."

HD37c.jpg

The simple stone and glass exterior illustrates these functions, the more public facilities, such as the café, occupying the transparent ground floor, and the "serene" galleries located overhead in the primarily solid second floor. A pixelated ceiling over the entry makes for a dramatic entry space at night.

HD37d.jpg

The exterior -- particularly the single window on the upper floor framing the distant landscape -- gives a hint at the design choices made within. Views across the galleries and atrium space are framed via openings that also connect with the surroundings, a suitable, though subtle gesture in the Midwestern landscape.

HD37e.jpg

Links:
:: Nerman Museum of Contemporary Art
:: Johnson County Community College
:: Kyu Sung Woo Architects
:: Detail Magazine coverage

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, October 20, 2007

After seeing these images at Dezeen of Richard Meier's artwork now on display at the Louise T Blouin Foundation in London, I couldn't help but think about how they relate to his buildings. Where what he's known for are geometrically crisp, white and light-filled, his art is geometrically chaotic, black and dingy. The images also made me wonder what the art would look like in some of his spaces. So here's some "mash-ups" I made of the possible interaction of the two.

meier-mash1.jpg
Museum of Decorative Arts in Frankfurt, Germany
Original image by darrell godliman

meier-mash2.jpg
Museum of Decorative Arts in Frankfurt, Germany
Original image by Gabó

meier-mash3.jpg
High Museum of Art in Atlanta, Georgia
Original image by Wizum

meier-mash4.jpg
Ara Pacis Museum in Rome, Italy
Original image by DarkFrame

1 Comments:

At Monday, October 22, 2007 8:04:00 AM, Blogger Alyson said...

I love the mash-ups! what an idea. They look like short circuit robots in futuristic labs. Thanks Meier, I see a real sence of humor.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, October 19, 2007


gas natural, originally uploaded by MaLóL.

Gas Natural's New HQ in Barcelona, Spain by EMBT.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

4 Comments:

At Friday, October 19, 2007 10:33:00 AM, Anonymous sideofwisdom said...

Wow, that looks really fun. I had not previously heard of this project. Thanks

 
At Friday, October 19, 2007 11:03:00 AM, Anonymous Frank said...

That's one impressive cantilever. I assume they don't get earthquakes there.

 
At Saturday, October 20, 2007 12:43:00 AM, Anonymous Resim said...

that looks really fun

 
At Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:46:00 PM, Blogger teillu said...

Regards from Barcelona! That's a 45m cantilever, so impressive! Will join some today photos of the building soon in the flickr pool!

Miralles died aged 44, so that's one of many of his postume works, captained by his wife, Benedetta Tagliabue.

Nice blog, will come back!!!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

"Gaudi did for architecture what Lautréamont did for poetry: he put it through the bath of madness."
the cock & the church_barcelona
"He pushed the Baroque as far as it would go, but he did not do so on the basis of accepted doctrines or categorizations."
gaudi1.jpg
"As locus of risible consecration, one which makes a mockery of the sacred, the Sagrada Familia causes modern space and the archaic space of nature to corrupt one another."
Sagrada Familia
"The flouting of established spatial codes and the eruption of natural and cosmic fertility generate an extraordinary and dizzying 'infinitization' of meaning."
Sagrada Familia
"Somewhere short of accepted symbolisms, but beyond everyday meanings, a sanctifying power comes into play which is neither that of the state, nor that of the Church, nor that of the artist, nor that of theological divinity, but rather that of a naturalness boldly identified with divine transcendence."
gaudi2.jpg

Excerpt by Henri Lefebvre, from The Production of Space, translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith (1991).

Photos by (from top to bottom): MaLóL, panic-embryo, klaus dolle, T.SC, and Lou Rouge.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Not really a rumination, but a diversion until I can obtain some more information and images for the next post. This is a video of developer Ian Schrager discussing 40 Bond, from its design, its location, its amenities, to its architects. Obviously done before construction, it should be interesting to see how the finished work compares to his vision in later posts.



"It's as if someone took a skeleton and dipped it in a bowl of wet sugar and pulled it out" - Ian Schrager

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, October 16, 2007


Malmö Eastern Cemetery, originally uploaded by jmtp.

The Chapels of St. Knut and St. Gertrude, 1935-43, at Malmö Eastern Cemetery by Sigurd Lewerentz.

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:

:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
:: Tag your photos archidose

Labels:

1 Comments:

At Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:48:00 PM, Anonymous epochedifice said...

lewerentz, strong, timeless, simple, and beautiful……….architecture.

That which serves to construct reveals itself in turn as architecture -Gottfried Semper

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, October 15, 2007

My weekly page update:
image02sm.jpg
Montjüic Pavilion & Garden in Barcelona, Spain by Federico Calabrese.

The updated book feature is Organizing for Change: Integrating Architectural Thinking in Other Fields, by Michael Shamiyeh and DOM Research Laboratory (Ed.).

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Stirling work, Chippers
Part IV's coverage of the official and unofficial results of the 2007 Stirling Prize. Oh, and Norman's got a new poll in the sidebar, the best archi-blogs of 2007.

ROADS LESS (BUT OFTEN) TRAVELED
"Architecture student and life enthusiast documents a semester abroad in Londontown..." (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

PYTR75
The blog of Pieter Van den Dorpe in Gent, Belgium. (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

1 Comments:

At Monday, October 15, 2007 1:52:00 PM, Blogger Pieter said...

Thanks for the link!
Enjoy my Belgian blog.
PYTR75

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, October 14, 2007

As promised a few weeks ago, when I presented some pre-visit images of Mike Nelson's installation, titled A Psychic Vacuum, at the old Essex Street Market at Essex and Delancey in Manhattan's Lower East Side, here's some of my own images of the spaces, as well as some of my thoughts on the experience.

A Psychic Vacuum

One enters from Delancey Street into an old restaurant that appears to be a found ruin, as if the artist barely touched the space. Visitors before me were enthralled with the detritus to be found in the front room and kitchen area, though I found it essentially to be a transition between the street and the installation itself. The view back to the entry above was especially nice, with the blacked-out windows, green neon framing, and glowing portal.

A Psychic Vacuum

Once through a door at the back of the storefront restaurant, one entered the realm of A Psychic Vacuum. Immediately this is apparent as the spaces are much smaller than the albeit small restaurant, even much smaller than a typical bedroom, which many of the spaces recall in their construction, ceiling heights, and fittings. Its the contents, of course, that are what's important, in addition to the labyrinth of the rooms themselves.

A Psychic Vacuum

Some rooms, like the second image above, are crammed with stuff that makes the resemblance of a barber shop, in this instance, an uneasy one. The extra artifacts complicate the thoughts of "this must be a barber shop as it has a barber's chair." While these and other spaces do recall certain real spaces (of which they are compiled), they seem to integrate these other artifacts in a manner like memories -- not clearly as clearly defined as the walls of the spaces themselves -- a la the installation's name.

A Psychic Vacuum

My favorite spaces tended to be empty or shrine-like in their treatment of objects. Lighting is especially important in the installation, as once one is through the storefront restaurant, there is no natural light to be found. One walks from one room to another, some leading to dead ends, some into rooms with locked doors, some into rooms that are mirrors of other rooms. This last makes for an especially interesting experience of the work on an emotional level, as the feeling of "I'm not gonna be able to find my way out of this place" comes on upon entering the space, though leaves just as quickly when the distinction between it and its mirror is made apparent.

A Psychic Vacuum

If my description is a bit vague or circuitous, this is unintentional but appropriate, as the installation is just that: vague in the space's purposes (past, present, and future), and circuitous in its path from entry to exit.

A Psychic Vacuum

At the end of the labyrinth is a large space full of sand. The columns of the old meat market rise out of the sand to the roof and the skylights above. One is back in the land of daylight and the Modernist scale. The relationship between this space and the previous ones isn't very clear, though I like to think that some of the rooms are located under the tallest mountains of sand. This hypothesis may explain the waiver one signs when entering the installation, but on second thought it most likely pertains to the route's lack of a clear exit in the event of a fire.

A Psychic Vacuum

But the idea of an above and a below, two sides of the same coin if you will, is very appealing. A labyrinth and an open space. A compressed space and a release space. Perhaps this notion is just a way for me to make sense of the two types of spaces being part of one installation, though I'm guessing I'm not the only one thinking that might just be the case.

3 Comments:

At Monday, October 15, 2007 2:48:00 PM, Anonymous Sideofwisdom said...

I wish I had pictures of my old Bridgeport Chicago apartment--you would have loved it.

 
At Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:59:00 AM, Anonymous sophie said...

thanks for posting the pictures. The installation really looks very intriguing. it really does make one ponder.

 
At Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:25:00 AM, Blogger cg said...

This looks amazing I have recently graduated from a architecture degree and I am currently working on a new living space project using re-used materials from www.salvoweb.com they have loads of wicked things and architectural salvage yards worldwide, maybe you could mix up a bit of the new instillations with a bit of architectural salvage.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Need a primer on the most famous and prolific architects working today? If so head on over to concierge.com and flip through it's Visionaries in Style + Design feature on eleven (twelve if you count Herzog & de Meuron as two, and too many to count if you start to consider employees) international architects.

concierge.jpg

Admittedly geared to travelers, the piece gives a brief lowdown on why they're so famous, followed by a project "on the horizon," such as Frank Gehry's New World Symphony Hall in Miami Beach, pictured above. For many it may not offer anything new, but for others it helps get 'em up to speed on the big names in the bizness right now.

The list includes:

1) Norman Foster:

:: Claim to Fame: Reichstag dome, Berlin
:: On the Horizon: Terminal 3, Beijing Airport

2) Diller Scofidio + Renfro:

:: Claim to Fame: Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston
:: On the Horizon: The High Line, New York

3) Frank Gehry:

:: Claim to Fame: The Guggenheim Museum, Bilbao
:: On the Horizon: New World Symphony hall, Miami

4) Renzo Piano:

:: Claim to Fame: Auditorium Parco della Musica, Rome
:: On the Horizon: Shard London Bridge, London

5) Jean Nouvel:

:: Claim to Fame: Torre Agbar, Barcelona
:: On the Horizon: Koncerthuset, Copenhagen

6) Santiago Calatrava:

:: Claim to Fame: Ciutat de les Arts i de les Cièncias, Valencia
:: On the Horizon: The PATH Terminal, NYC

7) Zaha Hadid:

:: Claim to Fame: Rosenthal Center for Contemporary Art, Cincinnati
:: On the Horizon: Opera House, Guangzhou

8) Richard Rogers:

:: Claim to Fame: Terminal 4, Madrid Airport
:: On the Horizon: Leadenhall Building, London

9) Thom Mayne:

:: Claim to Fame: Hypo Alpe-Adria Center, Klagenfurt
:: On the Horizon: Phare Tower, Paris

10) Rem Koolhaas:

:: Claim to Fame: Prada Epicenter, New York
:: On the Horizon: Dee & Charles Wyly Theatre, Dallas

11) Herzog & De Meuron:

:: Claim to Fame: The Tate Modern, London
:: On the Horizon: Olympic Stadium, Beijing

5 Comments:

At Saturday, October 13, 2007 8:56:00 PM, Blogger Andrew said...

I am reminded of the thing that Joshua Prince-Ramus said in a 2005 speech at the unveiling of the museum in Dallas:

I want to first make a little PR statement about architecture," he began. "Architecture is not created by individuals. The genius sketch . . . is a myth. Architecture is made by a team of committed people who work together, and in fact, success usually has more to do with dumb determination than with genius."

Perhaps, more curious is that in a world with a population of over 6 bil. people there are only 11... Small world or symptomatic of our small minds ability to have only 5 close friends?

 
At Saturday, October 13, 2007 9:11:00 PM, Blogger Andrew said...

Credit Due...
Here's the link for that quote:
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/95/open_design-prince-ramus.html

 
At Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:01:00 PM, Blogger John said...

That quote would go well with this post of mine on the REX office photo.

Even though most architects know, and I'm sure most other people know to a certain extent as well, that architecture is a collaborative act that requires many, many people, it's hard to divorce personality -- especially the charisma of a particular leader -- from the mix. This doesn't mean they should receive all the attention, good or bad, though with all the obsession over celebrity (is any building NOT designed by a celebrity architect worth attention,or even worthwhile as a building anymore?*) it's hard to see that happening in the press anytime soon.

* I don't ask this as some form of agreement with it, but as the trend I see happening, like a club isn't worth talking about unless a celebrity is seen there.

 
At Monday, October 15, 2007 12:44:00 PM, Blogger dp said...

not to mention foster and partners is well over 1000 people and his design board of graham phillips, david nelson and spencer de gray make all the final decisions. foster has veto projects on those that he prefers.

 
At Saturday, October 20, 2007 12:45:00 AM, Anonymous Designer said...

wow sup.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, October 12, 2007

This is the first in a series of posts on 40 Bond, the residential building in Manhattan's NoHo neighborhood designed by Herzog & de Meuron and developed by Ian Schrager. It is one of the most celebrated new buildings in New York City that I can think of in recent memory, even though it isn't yet complete. It's been on display for a multitude of admirers (including me) for a while, most recently the lobby, ground floor "screen", and the townhouses behind it.

Walking by the other day -- the first time since mid-summer -- what strikes me is that the apparent novelty of the whole thing is in fact a high-end update on numerous ideas that have been implemented in various ways by various people in the past. With an ultra-high budget and an aggressive housing market for the super rich living, and wanting to live in Manhattan, the building is able to appear new, while being ultimately a collage of pre-existing ideas executed in the Swiss duos notably artistic manner. I'll hopefully have a chance to address how, and if this differs from the work of other architects working today.

Briefly, this first rumination offers a comparison of a photo-realistic rendering of one of the 40 Bond townhouses with a photograph from a book I'm reading on the Chicago World's Fair in 1933.

40bond7.jpg
"These are the first townhouses built in New York for generations." - Ian Schrager

40bond7a.jpg
The Masonite House by Frazier and Raferty.

Unfortunately, for me the comparison is based more on a first-person view of the ground floor townhouses, which differ from the top view in the orientation of the stair, (more in alignment with the bottom photo). I'll try to snap a photo of one in the next couple of days and add it to this post.

Update 10.14: While I