Book Review: Commodification and Spectacle in Architecture
Commodification and Spectacle in Architecture edited by William S. Saunders, published by University of Minnesota Press, 2005. (Amazon)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5268c/5268c99fc9d3b9127086413b24559871290bffae" alt=""
This reader is the first of an anticipated three (Sprawl and Suburbia and Urban Planning Today forthcoming).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5268c/5268c99fc9d3b9127086413b24559871290bffae" alt=""
Certainly living needs, as opposed to desires, demand to be met but surely not in such a way as to ruin the world for generations yet unborn.Thus ends Kenneth Frampton's introduction to a collection of essays previously published in Harvard Design Magazine. But while Frampton clearly expresses the need to balance capitalism with sustainable foresight, it's a point of view that's altogether missing from an otherwise strong collection of critical writing. The targets of the ten essays range from the obvious (Las Vegas, Michael Graves @ Target) to the less so (a villa by OMA). Not surprisingly it is Rem Koolhaas who makes the most appearances, his Harvard Guide to Shopping acting as a sort of manifesto for architecture and capitalism, though here we find more criticism than regurgitation of his ideas. In addition to the range of subjects, there is a range of stances towards architecture and commodity, some authors embracing it (none more than Kevin Ervin Kelley, partner in an "an atypical design firm with a focus on leveraging consumer perceptions") but more often they question the validity of architecture when it exists only as a means for spending and creating wealth.
This reader is the first of an anticipated three (Sprawl and Suburbia and Urban Planning Today forthcoming).
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated for spam.