Do you think that they haven't bothered to look for any, instead reusing the architects previously mentioned. I own the "under" and found myself checking the ages of those architects mentioned and most were over 40. I think the reality of it is that there aren't many architects under that age who have a substantial practice/body of architecture. If I'm wrong however maybe its time we create our own list.
Perhaps the problem with architecture in general is that talking about unestablished/untested architects aren't worth wasting your time talking about. And just how many architects get established before they are 40?
Do you think that they haven't bothered to look for any, instead reusing the architects previously mentioned. I own the "under" and found myself checking the ages of those architects mentioned and most were over 40. I think the reality of it is that there aren't many architects under that age who have a substantial practice/body of architecture. If I'm wrong however maybe its time we create our own list.
ReplyDeletePerhaps the problem with architecture in general is that talking about unestablished/untested architects aren't worth wasting your time talking about. And just how many architects get established before they are 40?
ReplyDelete