NYC's Dream Airport
In July last year I posted about The Manhattan Airport Foundation's absurd proposal to transform Central Park into an airport. Well, that's got nothing on William Zeckendorf's dream airport for New York City, published in the March 18, 1946 issue of Life Magazine.
According to the magazine's text (found at Ptak Science Books where I discovered this gem), the airport would have covered 144 city blocks from 24th to 71st Streets and from Ninth Avenue to the Hudson River. (The view above is looking south.) That's approximately 990 acres 200-feet above the streets of Manhattan.
To quote Life, Zeckendorf thinks the $3 billion price tag "can be paid off by rental income within 55 years after the project is completed." Further, and quite optimistically, "although the Manhattan terminal is still in the drawing-board stage and has not yet had approval of New York officials, the planners expect that the increasing tide of air travel will make their idea a necessity." Considering I didn't notice an airport over my head the last time I walked west of Ninth Avenue in Hell's Kitchen, it looks like it wasn't as necessary as the planners imagined.
According to the magazine's text (found at Ptak Science Books where I discovered this gem), the airport would have covered 144 city blocks from 24th to 71st Streets and from Ninth Avenue to the Hudson River. (The view above is looking south.) That's approximately 990 acres 200-feet above the streets of Manhattan.
To quote Life, Zeckendorf thinks the $3 billion price tag "can be paid off by rental income within 55 years after the project is completed." Further, and quite optimistically, "although the Manhattan terminal is still in the drawing-board stage and has not yet had approval of New York officials, the planners expect that the increasing tide of air travel will make their idea a necessity." Considering I didn't notice an airport over my head the last time I walked west of Ninth Avenue in Hell's Kitchen, it looks like it wasn't as necessary as the planners imagined.
wow. that's one big ambitious design.
ReplyDeleteInteresting...seems like a very bold idea from a time period that thrived with bold ideas.
ReplyDeleteThat would have been an awfully convenient landing strip for that plane that ditched in the Hudson.
ReplyDeleteWe need more whimsy like this nowadays.
Was there a plan to rename Manhattan the Intrepid?
ReplyDeleteHoly Moses!
Down with planners!
ReplyDeleteamazing
ReplyDeletewhat about permanently mooring a 2x3 raft of aircraft carriers?
ReplyDeleteHey, i actually HAVE this issue of Life! I read the article and just googled to see if anything ever became of it... apparently not. But yeah, it was bold then for sure, and it still would alleviate traffic and flight time even more now than then.. maybe they should revisit the idea!
ReplyDelete