Pardon my Rambling
Commented on briefly in an earlier post , Nikos Salingaros's eight-part essay on Bernard Tschumi wrapped up a couple days ago at 2Blowhards. The author concludes by asserting that architectural theory is necessary, but not the kind practiced by Tschumi or his contemporaries. Instead Salingaros contends that architectural theory should follow the model of other disciplines where, "recent knowledge about a topic builds upon existing knowledge, older knowledge is replaced only by a better explanation of the same phenomenon, never because a fashion has changed, [and] a theory in one discipline must transition sensibly to other disciplines." This literal definition applies to science, engineering and other "objective" disciplines, but ignores many aspects of architecture that make it open to theory as practiced by Tschumi and others. Theory and Program In part two , Salingaros focuses on Tschumi's early work, particularly The Manhattan Transcripts, an influ...