Friday, April 29, 2005

Gapers Block reports on Bisonarium, an "initiative by [a] coalition of Chicago artists to convert Northerly island (the former Meigs field) into a park with Bisons [sic]."

It seems that the site (typos and all) exists more to provoke thinking about the site's future than to seriously propose a bison habitat on the island. But maybe it's not such a bad idea...

Missing image - bison.jpg
The future of Northerly Island?

3 Comments:

At Friday, April 29, 2005 2:33:00 PM, Blogger Ralph said...

But is it art?

 
At Friday, April 29, 2005 7:04:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I don't care if it is art, as long as I can take picture of it (unlike the structures in Millenium Park).

 
At Saturday, April 30, 2005 1:51:00 PM, Anonymous Tim said...

There are bison in golden gate park in San Francisco. They look kind of sad sometimes and they don't have a ton of room, but they make the city more interesting and they might have it worse elsewhere.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, April 28, 2005

A couple High Line-related tidbits hit my Bloglines box today:

:: Cool Hunting reports that Friends of the High Line is holding a t-shirt design competition, to be worn by supporters at an upcoming City Council meeting. Details at the Cool Hunting link. (via Archinect, where somebody jokingly asked if this competition would be similar to FHL's first, where they pick winners but then solicit professionals to design the real thing.)

:: Curbed points to a post by David Galbraith, who says that the plans to renovate the High Line is a "bad idea":
Given the challenges of creating a park where the benefits of it being on a raised deck outweigh the negative aspects of the potentially dank, dreary space beneath, there is another option for the highline, which doesn't result in pretty drawings - Tear it down...And free up another small piece of Manhattan from its curse - shadow.
I understand where Mr. Galbraith is coming from, especially given the current design's emphasis of the upper realm over the lower realm. But if we look at the image below, it's apparent that the underside is conceptualized as a usable, interior environment (in this case a cafe adjacent to an access point to the promenade above), not just the leftover of the Victorian iron structure.

Missing image - HL3.jpg

And this is the best and most obvious solution for dealing with the underside of the structure: use it! This is reminiscent of the frequent occupation of the undersides of highways and other public thoroughfares in Tokyo, where land is as valuable and scarce (if not moreso) than Manhattan:

Missing image - tokyo-stores.jpg

I would propose selectively keeping small sections open and exposed - outside of the already open street crossings - combined with enclosed portions (like above) to add variety along the 1.5 miles of the High Line. To call the renovation a terrible idea and push its demolition rather than its creative reuse seems myopic to me. And sure, this type of "Tokyo reuse" costs money, but if the renovation boosts the appeal of the area as expected, it might just be those patches underneath the High Line that become the most sought after.

4 Comments:

At Thursday, April 28, 2005 5:08:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

There is a project similar to this in Paris. The viaduct is stone arches, but pretty much the same concept with a nature walk where the trains used to be. There are a few stores tucked inside some of the arches. I happened to find it one day while I was looking for a job. It leads from the Bastille Opera House east to a few public parks. They also had some interesting buildings (for the time) that interacted with the walkway by straddling it and other gestures.

 
At Friday, April 29, 2005 1:52:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Ah, yes. The good 'ol Promenade Plantee, one of the inspirations for the High Lines transformation. Before Sunset had a great extended scene on the promenade, good advertising for any similar reuse.

 
At Friday, April 29, 2005 7:07:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I say keep the High Line, but only if funded by private dollars. NYC has too many other bills to pay.

I think they aren't cashing in on the obvious tourist angle on this. They should flood the gift stores with post cards from the High Line. It would show NYC isn't all hiding in the shadows of buildings and muggings on the subway. This might compare with the I-heart-NY campaign of the 1980s.

 
At Wednesday, May 04, 2005 2:31:00 PM, Anonymous chris dobosz said...

fyi -
in berlin, they have renovated the space underneath several above-ground S-Bahn stations/overpasses into retail shops, several of which are quite pleasant.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

This month Apartment Therapy has been searching for the Smallest, Coolest Apartment in a contest voted on by readers. According to their page:
We've never accepted that a lack of space or budget are fatal when it comes to creating an inspiring home...we've learned there are always solutions -- the small, genius improvisations -- that can make even the most modest of real estate lovable...nothing inspires us more than the hand-made home, the stylish studio wedged into some urban crevice...the ultimate achievement in this category: the quintessential New York City apartment masterpiece.
The only guidelines are that the apartments must be under 500 s.f. and be in NYC's five boroughs. Skimming the thirty apartments in the running and looking at the images and the current state of votes, it's apparent that good photography is as important as good design and furnishings. The styles present are varied, definitely illustrating the occupant's tastes, part of the appeal of this competition.

Missing image - reno.jpg

Mine - and apparently many other people's - favorite is Jen and Roy's Minimalist Reno, a 420 s.f., minimalist one-bedroom apt. on the Upper West Side (living area and bathroom above). As you might have guessed, Jen and Roy are architects.

Final 5 will be presented Monday, May 2 with voting for the three winners until the end of that week.

1 Comments:

At Friday, April 29, 2005 7:16:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

My favorite is #18. Go Rebecca, cram yourself into 185 sq feet.

I like what contestant #25, Melissa, said, "I've decorated it on the cheap, so I regularly paint or rework the furniture to mix it up a bit." I think you have to with a small that small, otherwise its just a metal toilet and a bad draft away from being a prison cell.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

Here's a recent smattering of Op-Ed's, Commentaries, and good 'ol architectural Criticism:

Rethinking Ground Zero
New York Times Editorial:
Three and a half years after the attack on Lower Manhattan, too many of the elaborate and even inspiring plans for rebuilding seem frozen on paper...particularly true for the building that the world most connects with the idea of rebirth at the World Trade Center site:...Freedom Tower...a stunning creation forged by the opposing architects Daniel Libeskind and David Childs.
Unfortunately, calling Freedom Tower a stunning creation pretty much discredits any other opinion in the editorial.

::::::::::::::::

Move the United Nations Downtown
by Fred Bernstein:
By taking space at ground zero [7 WTC & Freedom Tower], the United Nations would solve its space problem, practically overnight. But more than that, it would capture the public's imagination...The Freedom Tower could, in a way no one predicted, become a true symbol of freedom.
I do believe Bernstein proposed this scenario a while ago in his Twin Piers 9/11 Memorial. Moving the UN to the WTC site makes a lot of sense (practically and symbolically) to me, but it's boggling that they apparently aren't even considering it as an option.

::::::::::::::::

Regarding the 180-Degree Turn From a 90-Degree Standard
by Roger K. Lewis:
Strong architectural concepts reflect project conditions as well as the creativity of the designer. But an innovative idea, once executed, can catch the eye of other designers and appeal to them for purely visual reasons. The catchy, aesthetically stimulating idea then begins appearing elsewhere, and before long it has become little more than a faddish, overused motif.
Mr. Lewis argues against angles like it's taking over architecture, though buildings by the likes of Libeskind, Gehry and Morphosis are definitely the exception, not the rule.

::::::::::::::::

Architecture Elsewhere
by Michael Blowhard:

That Brutal Joint points to the comments on this post, where the neverending tug-of-war between Classicism and Contemporary continues.

::::::::::::::::

These and similar pieces always seem to remind me of Jean Renoir's classic film The Rules of the Game, specifically a quote by Octave, a character played by the director himself, who says (paraphrased): "All of the world's problems exist because everybody has their own opinion and everybody believes they're right."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, April 24, 2005

My weekly page update:

missing image - umbrella2sm.jpg
Solar Umbrella in Venice, California by Angela Brooks and Lawrence Scarpa of Pugh + Scarpa.

The updated book feature is Los Angeles: The Architecture of Four Ecologies, by Reyner Banham.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Poseidon Undersea Resorts
Yes, a five-star sea floor resort complex, soon to be under construction near the Bahamas and near the United Arab Emirates.

Roadside Architecture
A thorough photographic guide to diners, bunyans, drive-ins, and so forth all over the U.S.

Watts Towers
Page by Friends of the Watts Towers Arts Center on the landmark towers in LA's Watts area by folk artist Simon Rodia.

White Dot
It's International TV Turnoff Week! Celebrate in style.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Updating a previous post on Thom Mayne's competition-winning proposal for Alaska's State Capitol, the Juneau Empire reports that the project is on hold. Juneau's Mayor Bruce Botelho cited finances and public disapproval of the designs as reasons for this decision.

The article also indicates that the city spent almost a million dollars of state money to fund the competition, money secretly appropriated that Governor Frank Murkowski demanded be given back to the state, which it did.

Missing image - alaska1.jpg

While the future of the project does not look bright, Botelho is quoted at the end of the article as saying, "...at the end of the day, the project needs to happen." Let's just hope it happens in a more open and honest manner and doesn't end in grumblings over old versus new.

(via Archinect)

6 Comments:

At Sunday, April 24, 2005 10:47:00 AM, Blogger Bryan said...

All I have to say is that I think my state's capitol, in Lincoln, Nebraska, is the best.

http://www.capitol.org/images/cd_03.JPG

 
At Sunday, April 24, 2005 9:52:00 PM, Anonymous Jeff said...

Sometimes, it's nice to live in a city where the mayor doesn't give a shit about public disapproval.

 
At Sunday, April 24, 2005 10:21:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

too bad such an innovative inspirational idea has to be shelved
I was gonna take a trip to Alaska just to gawk at the most innovative of the typically bland, but classical truthful and noteworhty in their own right, capitols

 
At Sunday, April 24, 2005 11:17:00 PM, Anonymous MViamontes said...

Lincoln's capitol is pretty nice - I went there two years ago on a class trip. The town is pretty vibrant too...

 
At Monday, April 25, 2005 11:38:00 AM, Blogger David Sucher said...

The Capitol Building in Indianapolis is pretty nice, too.

 
At Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:58:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for contemporary architecture. Plus I prefer something like this than a classical russian facade.

But sometimes some of the contempory projects like this seem to start with an interesting form, but then only add a more or less 2d facade. There doesn't seem to be much 3d articulation or refinement to the original form.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, April 22, 2005

Yo La Tengo played a smokin' show at The Vic last nite, with a healthy sampling of covers and their greatest "hits." For a taste of them live, check out Sunsquashed, a good source of news as well as live mp3's.

Missing image - tengo.jpg
Yo La Tengo "hatching" at Maxwell's Hoboken. New Year's 2003/04.

1 Comments:

At Friday, April 22, 2005 7:40:00 PM, Anonymous Jeff said...

It was indeed rocking. I had to leave at the beginning of the second encore because I had an early start to today, but was awesome.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Last year Illy and Domus held an international competition to "stimulate ideas capable of identifying new ways of enjoying espresso coffee." From the 740 entries, Break in Movement by Mauricio Bruna Fruns from Santiago, Chile was chosen as the winner.

Missing image - illy.jpg

According to Illy's site, "Coffee is served at the beginning of an escalator and the time it takes to reach the top can be used to savor the cup of coffee...at the top of the escalator the cup is thrown in a dispenser which will press it so as to transform it into a ticket for an exhibition or a show, or into a postcard."

(via WM$NA)

1 Comments:

At Monday, April 25, 2005 9:24:00 PM, Blogger cfitzart said...

It's a nice and original idea, but I can't see how it would happen without people spilling coffee everywhere lol

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Yes, the May 2005 issue of Architectural Digest is on the newsstands! Normally this would be of very little, if any, interest to architects, but this is their "Architecture Issue", featuring in-depth coverage of thirteen houses, ranging from the neo-traditional to the neo-avant garde. The rest of the issue is devoted to residential architecture, its history, and its furnishings (the last being the usual domain of the magazine.)

Two houses by architects in and around Chicago are featured: Margaret McCurry's reinterpretation of the Midwestern barn (House of 5 Gables) and a Modern glass box by Thomas Rosznak for him and his family. Coincidentally a recent condo development by Rosznak is situated right across the street from McCurry's office on North Wells Street.

Missing image - rosznak.jpg

Reminiscent of fellow IIT-ers Mies van der Rohe and Ron Krueck, Rosznak's design is based on a grid and a series of cubes of differing sizes. The exterior glass walls linking these cubes is setback to help define the forms but also to create vistas that cross small pockets of exterior as one looks across the house. The most surprising - and perhaps successful - feature is the steel structure supporting the second floor and the roof: squarish steel beams running north-south every five feet or so are painted bright yellow, a strong counterpoint to the exposed concrete slabs. According to the article, this gesture was inspired by Shinto shrines, though here it falls somewhere between that ancient practice and the more recent Modern movement, helping to give the house a personality of its own.

Also, Architecture Digest is sponsoring Architecture Days, featuring tours and lectures in three cities, including Chicago (from May 4-10). Unfortunately all events have a fee, with most at $25.00!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

Here's an interesting-looking project by Valerio Dewalt Train, a hotel titled Miglin Staybridge.

Missing image - staybridge.jpg
Click here for a larger image.

As described in the News portion of the architect's web page:
"Chicago’s LaSalle Street starts at the Board of Trade in the heart of the City’s modern financial district and ends at the Lakefront in Lincoln Park, one of its most historic residential districts. The Miglin Staybridge Suites, a two hundred room extended stay hotel is a marker on the skyline, separating these two very different areas. It is the last landmark of the city’s modernist core, reveling in the messy vitality of the urban core, before the more restrained fabric of Lincoln Park begins to dominate."
For reference, the new McDonald's is a block or few south (right on the rendering). Thanks to Karen for the head's up.

4 Comments:

At Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:11:00 AM, Blogger Bryan said...

Not being from Chicago myself, and if what I'm hearing about this future hotel being a dividing point between two different styles along La Salle Street, then I can learn to like it.

I'm guessing the Ontario Street mess is to the south, and the more restrained stuff is north of it. This looks like a nice blending building to me. I wouldn't stay there myself.

 
At Thursday, April 21, 2005 4:38:00 PM, Anonymous Lil'G said...

Wow...those guys are really on a role. It's funny, you don't really hear much about them "in the news", but I think they are doing the best work of any architect in the city right now.

 
At Saturday, April 23, 2005 3:14:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

I don't know. I've very skeptical about it. The form doesn't really do anything for me. It seems to be sculptural, but fairly clunky. What appears to be very blank fascades on the north and south seem to mimic similar condo tower fascades to the east.

I want to like this firm just for their openly progressive voice, but their projects seem to go a bit over the edge for my tastes. The earthquake fascade at 3Com to me doesn't make sense if it doesn't relate to the interior and is purely a fascade exercise.

 
At Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:49:00 PM, Anonymous Eric Mathiasen said...

I live on Huron just west of Lasalle (between Lasalle and Wells). I'd LOVE to see that get built, even though it could block some of my views a little.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Friends of the High Line has launched a new web site devoted to the preliminary designs by Field Operations and Diller Scofidio + Renfro. This new site features a slide show, text on the project's goals, informative maps on different aspects of the High Line, and a detailed view of the Gansevoort access point.

Missing image - HL1.jpg

The presentation of this material online is timed to an exhibition opening tomorrow at MoMA.

Missing image - HL2.jpg

Check out this NYT article for more information on this "urban oasis 30 feet up."

2 Comments:

At Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:58:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm an architecture student, and i stumbled upon ur blog whilst googling some architecture pictures. Lurvely lurvely pictures.

 
At Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:14:00 AM, Blogger Bryan said...

I might soon be an architecture student myself. I do not use words like "lurvely" or "ur". I hope that this anonymous is not attending the school I might be going to.

Anyways, I've seen the High Line. It is kinda neat up there. I hope that they do make a park out of all of it. But don't let their renderings fool ya, it's not as grandiose at it seems.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

It seems like architecture is taking a more prominent role in advertising these days. Specifically sexy, photogenic architecture by the likes of Frank Gehry, Morphosis, or Rem Koolhaas. And specifically car commercials, where the Walt Disney Concert Hall, the Caltrans HQ, or the Seattle Public Library - by these architects, respectively - sit in the background as this year's model zips by in the foreground.

Missing image - vw.jpg

This above print ad for Volkswagen is a good example, especially given that advertisers strive for consistency across different media (TV, print, internet, radio, etc) in their ad campaigns to create an image in the consumer's mind. In terms of print area, the car that's being "sold" takes up less room in the ad than OMA's Public Library in Seattle (in fact, it takes up less area than the pavement or the people's silhouettes, for that matter, showing that these days quantity isn't as important as quality, or more specifically mood). Basically VW is taking a trendy piece of architecture and using it to add appeal to what looks like a run-of-the-mill, four-door sedan. Take the building out and what do you have? A car that looks like many other cars on the market these days. The architecture helps to create an identity for the car with the consumer.

I'm sure this isn't a new thing, but the more I see TV commercials of cars whizzing by the latest curvaceous or jagged building, the more these commercials seem the same, to the point where the distinction or identity that the advertisers are aiming for isn't working anymore.

4 Comments:

At Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:29:00 AM, Blogger Ralph said...

It is, as you say, interesting how the new architecture is used to give the feeling of style and modernity. What amuses me is how often the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Building (A.C. Martin 1960's) appears in commercials despite it's age. And it has the same impact as the new buildings.

 
At Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:38:00 PM, Anonymous Edward said...

And check out the cover of this week's Time magazine - Ann Coulter in a Barcelona chair!

 
At Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:24:00 AM, Blogger richa said...

role of architectural spaces too is very commendable in advertising, as this affects the psychology of the consumer...and in some way acts as a link between the product to be sold and the consumer..so yes good observation!

 
At Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:04:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media

an interesting read

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, April 18, 2005

My weekly page update:

missing image - c2c1sm.jpg
Cradle to Cradle House by Matthew Coates and Tim Meldrum, with Brendan Connolly, Ron van der Veen, Kristine Kenney, Julie Petersen, and Richard Franko.

The updated book feature is The Slow Food Guide to Chicago, edited by Kelly Gibson and Portia Belloc Lowndes.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Invisible Hotel
Web page on the exhibition opening tomorrow at the DESTE Foundation’s Centre for Contemporary Art in Athens, featuring ten avant-garde architects proposals of what a future hotel could be.

Schizophrenic Architecture
Gallery of buildings that "no longer resemble what they started out as, showing quite visibly the different intentions of different people". (via the SCD)

Core77.com
Industrial design online resource, or "supersite."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, April 17, 2005

Missing image - mies.jpg
On May 17, 2005, The Mies van der Rohe Society is offering to the winning bidder the opportunity to break the first 10-foot window of S.R. Crown Hall. The glass breaking will kick off the façade restoration of this Modernist masterpiece and National Historic Landmark. This event – “Smash Bash” – not only launches the building’s restoration, but also Crown Hall’s 50th anniversary. You are bidding on the chance to be part of architectural history.
Yes, it's true. At the time of writing this, the high bid is $510.00 with 4 days 15 hours to go. I wonder if winner gets the choice of how they smash the glass?

Update 04.25: The auction closed on April 22 with a winning bid of $2,705.00 by miesenkel. INTBUA has a story on the renovation and auction.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, April 15, 2005

Yes, on April 15, 1955, Ray Kroc opened the first McDonald's in Des Plaines, IL. The first day's take was $366.12, an amount the franchise probably takes in every fraction of a second. To commemorate this milestone date, their River North "flagship" opened today. I strolled over at lunch to check it out (though I have to admit that I ate elsewhere).

Also, Lynn Becker's review of the building is featured on his site. Titled "Schlock Corridor", the piece gives some insight into the context that this building fits into, with a photo portrait of the area and a solicitation for a "Schlock Corridor Concept."

Missing image - mcd1.jpg
How many arches do you count?

Missing image - mcd2.jpg
I just don't know what to say about this thing.

Missing image - mcd3.jpg
The glass wall opts to reflect the street and sidewalk.

Missing image - mcd4.jpg
Velvet ropes at a McDonald's?

Missing image - mcd5.jpg
Yes, that's an ambulance at the drive thru, and no, it's not ordering lunch.

Update 04.16:
Some gratuitous night shots:

Missing image - mcd6.jpg

Missing image - mcd7.jpg

5 Comments:

At Friday, April 15, 2005 6:54:00 PM, Blogger KevinS said...

When compared to the giant tree frog on the rain forest cafe located nearby, the McD's is not so bad.

When compared to about anything else, it is terrifying.

 
At Friday, April 15, 2005 7:16:00 PM, Blogger 'Thought & Humor' said...

Thought I would stop in to say, "Hi"!!! Cool pics.

Howdy

'Thought & Humor'
http://ilovehowdy.blogspot.com/
Harvard Humor Club
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Harvard_Humor_Club/

 
At Friday, April 15, 2005 9:41:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

spam, is there no place you won't go?

Okay, so don't take this the wrong way, I think the new Mickey D's is horrible, downright terrifying, but I like the reflecting wall on the front of the place.

 
At Saturday, April 16, 2005 10:41:00 AM, Blogger John said...

I agree that the canted, sometimes-reflective wall is probably the design's best asset, but the detailing of the spider fittings is extrememly clunky, like everything is twice as big as it should be.

 
At Sunday, April 17, 2005 10:47:00 PM, Blogger Frank H said...

Don't take this the wrong way, but considering it is an American institution (good or bad) it has a right to honoring it's past. Don't get me wrong. There was an opportunity to move forward, but it is replacing the ol' Rock n' Roll McDonalds. It is a step up. There are other opportunities to have forward looking architecture than in the neighborhood of Hard Rock, old Planet Hollywood, Debevics, and Rain Forest. Tourists and others need to be enlightened, but it is quite a difficult task.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday sees the opening of the new and improved Walker Art Center with its Herzog and De Meuron-designed expansion to its existing facilities by Edward Larrabee Barnes. The Swiss duo - known for their simple, yet graphically and texturally rich exteriors - will also see its design for San Francisco's de Young Museum open later this year. They - along with Renzo Piano - seem poised to take over the U.S. market on cultural facilities, specifically art museums. While a building by H&DM would probably not be confused with one by Piano (and vice-versa), what they have in common is a respectful approach to designing spaces for art, a trend in architecture that goes against buildings and spaces that tend to compete or upstage the art within, as in Gehry's Guggenheim Bilbao.

Missing image - walker1.jpg
Image from The New York Times

Tyler Green's review of the expansion states that "While the [Milwaukee Art Museum by Santiago Calatrava] relied on its building to attract an audience, the new Walker plays it safe and relies upon its collection," referring to the debt incurred by MAM in the wake of its signature building, a bird in flight on Lake Michigan's shore. Is this experience, as well as the closing of Steven Holl's Bellevue Art Museum shortly after its unveiling (it's set to reopen this year...but for how long?), telling museum director's that the "Bilbao effect" has run its course?

Missing image - walker2.jpg
Image from The New York Times

While Nicolai Ourousoff thinks the Walker Art Center's expansion could be more striking and sophisticated, his review is positive, stating "Instead of a monumental object, the architects have fashioned a building that hovers at the intersection of urban and suburban cultures - no small feat in a country that seems to be dividing more and more along those lines."

Christopher Hawthorne's take is more about decoration than the museum's fit into the American context (via): "It will be fascinating to judge the results...when a prominent architect grows bold enough to put ornament back on a facade, where it is still pretty much taboo. For all their architectural daring, Herzog and De Meuron still weren't willing to go that far in Minneapolis."

But it seems like the lack of ornament on the exterior isn't the architects choice so much as a necessity given the budget and its inherent focus on the art over the architecture. Herzog and De Meuron are probably the most overtly ornamental architects in contemporary practice, embedding images in concrete and glass, elevating gabions to the status of architecture (and maybe even art), and generally pushing materials and technology to find new avenues of expression for architecture. Their aluminum-clad tower and simple interiors in Minneapolis sounds like a compromise, but definitely not a bad one.

3 Comments:

At Friday, April 15, 2005 8:58:00 PM, Anonymous epochedifice said...

NICE!

 
At Saturday, April 16, 2005 6:08:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

not the best from h + DeM though. The interior is rather nice, however is not representative of the whole. In fact the form looks a bit like they were too busy to pay attention to the job, which is a pity. After seeing the Prada building this one comes off quite underwhelming. Not that they need to be sensational all of the time, but in this case the cantilevered form seems like it should be a strong statement but all we get is a tired looking object. It would have been better if they had left it more like the Laban Centre, simple but strong.

 
At Saturday, April 16, 2005 12:42:00 PM, Anonymous Rob said...

Ouroussoff suggests that aluminum was chosen for the skin by cost-costing Walker officials. Not quite.
H + dM proposed, as Ouroussoff writes, "to wrap it in a luminous Teflon fabric like an enormous paper lantern" and the Walker was very excited by the idea. Over a year into the construction process, H + dM finally built a mock-up of the Teflon concept and found it ugly as did Walker officials. (Remember: Minneapolis already has experience with the Teflon-covered Metrodome which is not only ugly but difficult to keep clean in Minnesota's harsh winters. Why no one at the firm or the museum thought of this before is beyond me.) The aluminum skin was chosen as a last-minute and ultimately more expensive stand-in for the Teflon. It would have been beautiful in (the De Young museum's) copper, particularly as a counterpoint to the three massive churches across the street, but that wasn't to be.
I don't know what Ouroussoff means by "sophistication" but I would think that the best metric for that would be in what energy and possibilities the building brings to the center's mission: the arts. On that count, the building seems to be a home-run. See Holland Cotter's art review here: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/15/arts/design/15cott.html
See also a great slideshow of the facility from the StarTribune:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/319/5322668.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Continuing the last post's theme of BAD - and picking up on Bryan's comment about lack of contextuality - I thought I would post this image of the Hotel InterContinental's east facade, a mural of whales both over and underwater.

Missing image - whales.jpg

Originally, I took the photo to capture a moment in the slow demolition of the building in the foreground, but I turned my camera vertically to fit in this odd wall painting. Someone like me can't help but think this mural is strangely out of place. As I saw it take shape many years ago on my walks to and from work, I wanted to believe it was temporary. But, alas, it's become a beloved part of Streeterville, though beloved mainly by tourists on their ride from Navy Pier back to the Magnificent Mile.

This just goes to show that even good, old architecture - in the wrong hands - can spawn something as tasteless as the new McDonald's.

9 Comments:

At Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:30:00 PM, Anonymous Jeff said...

The thing that always grabbed me with that one was the breaching whale that appears to be an amputee.
Still, It's a decent enough use for a brick wall, until someone comes up with some wonderful architecture to cover it up. Ahem

 
At Thursday, April 14, 2005 12:50:00 AM, Anonymous matt said...

we have the same exact mural in philly. though we do now have a whale... http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/11384196.htm

 
At Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:29:00 AM, Blogger Ralph said...

Whale is the new black.

 
At Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:54:00 PM, Anonymous ryan said...

This reminds me of the trend of using old boarded up brick buildings as billboards for adverting. This is an even worse use of public buildings, and certainly can't help the neighborhood.

 
At Thursday, April 14, 2005 6:25:00 PM, Blogger Benjy said...

I remember Steve Dahl lining up the location for that mural, which is by the Hawaiian artist Wyland. It was originally supposed to be someplace else that fell through.

http://www.wyland.com

 
At Thursday, April 14, 2005 9:18:00 PM, Blogger Megan McMillan said...

Yup. Wyland is responsible for that atrocity. There's one in downtown Dallas, too, and in Long Beach, CA. Both near aquariums. I've heard many other cities are vying for their very own whale graffiti. I've got a marine biologist friend who says that the guy knows nothing at all about marine anatomy. Puts dorsal fins on whales.

 
At Friday, April 15, 2005 11:39:00 PM, Blogger Anthony said...

its the least boring thing there, because it is in the worst taste.

good taste is perscriptive

 
At Sunday, April 17, 2005 10:52:00 PM, Blogger Frank H said...

But the point we are all missing is that it commemorates the annual migration of hump back whales up the St. Lawrence and through the Great Lakes to spawn on the beaches of Chicago. As Chicagoan as prohibitions gangsters (bang bang.)

 
At Wednesday, December 28, 2005 11:24:00 AM, Blogger Andrew said...

We also have a monstrosity of the like here in Milwaukee. Thank the good lord they have decided to tear the building down, whales and all. There was actually a concerted effort to save the "whale wall", because of its uniqueness.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Lots of crappy architecture making headlines these day. Here's a sampling:

Blair Kamin pans the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library & Museum in Springfield, IL, designed by HOK and set to open this weekend. (alt. link for Kamin article and more news at the Chicago Tribune)
Missing image - bad1.jpg

Get your appetites ready. McDonald's new two-story "flagship" in Chicago's River North opens for business Friday. Would you like a clunky building with that?
Missing image - bad2.jpg

James Howard Kunstler's latest Eyesore of the Month is a lesson not only in bad architecture, but also extremely bad circulation.
Missing image - bad3.jpg

And Design Observer tackles the latest unfortunate trend in Southern Californian residential design: Tuscan.
Missing image - bad4.jpg

9 Comments:

At Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:14:00 AM, Anonymous Marcus said...

The McDonald's building is actually a replica of the first ever McDonalds.
Only four times bigger.
With three storey high glazing.

 
At Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:40:00 AM, Blogger Ralph said...

The Tuscan epidemic is not just southern California based. Their are usually three or four syle variations available from builders, tuscan, country french and something like clunky American 40's. Tuscan is the best of the lot.

 
At Wednesday, April 13, 2005 3:21:00 PM, Blogger PFC said...

Why can't architects use the Tuscan thing as an INSPIRATION, rather than making the house look like a movie set.

The main common thread in all of these appears to be a lack of subtelty

 
At Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:23:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I don't think any of these four buildings tried its hardest to complete is surrounding neighborhoods. I think that's important.

That Mickey D's is a complete waste of urban space. The core of a city shouldn't allow single use establishments.

 
At Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:29:00 PM, Blogger portuguesa nova said...

Oh my lord...disturbing, all of them.

 
At Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:34:00 PM, Anonymous smurf said...

The McDonalds is of course better 4 times bigger as anything is, like a carton of fries or your ass.

 
At Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:21:00 AM, Anonymous MViamontes said...

The aesthetically challenged McDonald's was [and now always will be] a black hole where the city's urban fabric ceases to exist. It is an icon of hideous architecture and substandard suburban-like planning. Unbelievable.

 
At Friday, April 15, 2005 6:51:00 PM, Blogger KevinS said...

One of the oddr opinions I have heard on the McD's neighborhood is that people want to fight the "Manhattan-ization" of the neighborhood. As if rows of high rise buildings in a city are a negative thing?