Tuesday, January 31, 2006

For advertising agency Mother, Clive Wilkinson renovated "Derwent Valley's Tea Building in Shoreditch, a burgeoning arts community on the fringes of the City of London."

Missing image - HD22a.jpg

Since Mother's inception in 1996, their employees have worked around a communal table. As the company grew, so did the table, until now the concrete table in their new digs accommodates 200 and resembles an interior racetrack, a la Fiat's rooftop track in Turin, Italy.

Missing image - HD22b.jpg

To connect the different floors, stairs interrupt the table, blurring the line between table and floor. At some points one is the extension of the other, making for quite the impression on potential clients.

Missing image - HD22c.jpg

Links:
:: Mother, London
:: Clive Wilkinson
:: Interior Design
:: Frame Magazine

Labels:

4 Comments:

At Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:22:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

you see there office on http://www.motherlondon.com - great website by the way.

 
At Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:17:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Thanks anon. Just updated the link to their web page. Their's is a pretty cool page.

 
At Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:02:00 PM, Anonymous richard hamilton said...

Thanks for passing on 'Mothers' progress.

years ago, when I visited Mother as a bicycle messenger, their central conference/design team table had an immediate and profound impact on me. It threw me into an awareness of 'space' and sense of place that catalized my journey as a commited architecture student and my now chosen career as an architect.

I remember that fateful envelope delivery of years past like it was yesterday. I still describe the positive and productive environment that Mother had created and compare it to all other office situations that I encounter. (as recently as last week to my drafting dept. here)

thanks and kind regards,

-Richard

 
At Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:16:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is the beginning of your adventure with site. All you wanted to know about it is here.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

I'm coming a bit late to this issue, but just today I saw images of the draft master plan for Navy Pier. According to Hello Beautiful! - who has a large chunk of its latest show (worth a listen) devoted to this plan - the city of Chicago,
asked a Canadian company specializing in theme and water parks to propose a new design to bring Navy Pier into the future. Their suggestions include a floating hotel, an indoor water park, and a monorail stretching the length of the pier.
Here's Forrec's imagery:

Missing image - crappier1.jpg
Said monorail bisecting the existing mall/winter garden space.

Missing image - crappier2.jpg
Forrec's proposal to bring Navy Pier into the future seems to resemble an old-fashioned postcard, planes and all.

Missing image - crappier3.jpg
The inside water park to keep tourists off the streets of Chicago.

For further amusement, read Blair Kamin's biting critique of the plan.

5 Comments:

At Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:30:00 PM, Blogger KevinS said...

As someone who pays taxes in Chicago, all I have to say is that I want my money back.

 
At Wednesday, February 01, 2006 2:28:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I mostly hate it. Don't mind the concept of the Mid-Pier Park or even adding another theater, as the Skyline Stage has never really taken off, but the water park and the monorail have gots to go. What is this-- Disney World circa 1973?

I also noticed on the floor plan that they have included an expanded Children's Museum. I thought the Children's Museum has proposed moving to Grant Park. I know something was presented to the city. Does anyone have a link or information on that proposed building?

Just wondering...

 
At Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:42:00 PM, Blogger Jennifer said...

Who made the decision to hire this firm? That person's vision for the pier must certainly be as myopic as the plan put forth. He or she should shoulder the blame for this embarrassment.

I'm thankful to Kamin for his call for sanity. We can only hope it will do some good.

 
At Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:21:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Holy CrapPier Batman! I've not seen the likes of this since, as another poster mentioned, circa 1973 or before. The fact that the plans got as far as they did in todays society is absolutely astounding. This reminds me of the Simpson's episode where the town is duked into building a monorail in order to progress.

 
At Monday, July 02, 2007 5:16:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

stupid designers from canada

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

This weekend as I traded in some books at a used bookstore in my neighborhood* I saw the distinctive binding of Diller + Scofidio's Flesh. If you're not familiar with the book, the front cover is a right butt cheek (Diller's?) and the back cover is a left butt cheek (Scofidio's?), making the binding, yep, the butt crack.

Missing image - flesh.jpg
Cover sans crack binding

Seeing this crack peering at me at the very back of the store, it reminded me of a time when I worked in a bookstore in college. Although I worked there less than a year, I was entrusted with some money every month to stock the store with architecture books, something apparently still going strong. At the time I dug (and still do) D+S, so it was an easy choice to order Flesh: Architectural Probes (its full title). Well, the owner saw the binding and stubbornly refused to put it on the shelf, instead keeping it out of sight behind the counter and making it rather difficult to sell.

A few weeks later or so it was sold by my astute friend Eric who had been working at the store longer than me, perhaps gleaning more tricks of the trade than I. He told me that one day a girl came into the store and was buying an architecture book or two, so - remembering about the dirty book behind the counter - with shifty eyes he quietly said to her, "hey...ya wanna buy a raunchy architecture book?" Actually, whatever he said exactly I don't remember, but I do know she walked out with the book.

As I glanced at the butt crack sitting in a dark corner of the store (perhaps unintentionally) this weekend, I couldn't help but think of this story.

*Unfortunately I don't remember the name of the new (to me) bookstore, though it's located on the south side of the 1900 block of west Irving Park and has a decent selection of books (I walked away with the 3rd edition of Mechanism of Meaning by Arakawa + Gins) in a small storefront space.

4 Comments:

At Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:05:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, Stormy never was one to make waves!

 
At Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:19:00 PM, Blogger César said...

Nice story. And what is the book about? Is it good?

 
At Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:43:00 AM, Blogger John said...

anon - Funny. Stormy. Waves. I wonder who you are...

césar - The book is basically a monograph on the duo's work, pre Blur building and other large-scale architectural works. It has a lot of installations and theater sets, as well as unbuilt architectural designs. The book's layout is layered and multi-directional, making it difficult for some (see the comments on Amazon's page) but rewarding for those with patience. It's an interesting melding of content and form.

 
At Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:51:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

First, this is old!!! Then, the way you talk about it, makes the book sound quite boring - uninteresting, really. Perhaps, you should read it?!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 30, 2006

Every once in a while a building comes along that fulfills your faith that architecture can be a noble profession...
So gushes Blair Kamin in a review where he heaps praise upon Thom Mayne's soon-to-be-opened design for the Campus Recreation Center at the University of Cincinnati.

Missing image - maynestreet1.jpg

These photos from a tour of the center show the all-too-familiar dynamism of Mayne's architecture.

Missing image - maynestreet2.jpg

What appeals to Kamin (and me) is the urban qualities of the architecture, not a stand-alone building but an assemblage of the Rec Center as well as the Tangeman University Center by Gwathmey Siegel and the Steger Student Life Center by Moore Ruble Yudell. Common geometries (curves) and common materials (zinc and other metals) tie the buildings together, though it's the car-free Main Street that links them together spatially.

Missing image - maynestreet3.jpg

(via Archinect)

2 Comments:

At Friday, February 03, 2006 9:48:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see no integration in this building at all. Integration is the act or process of placing all the architectural elements in a logical or at least proportional way on a single building (no matter what the kind of language being used).
Is the Pritzker prize a kind of Karma or new learning process for the super "star architects"??????

 
At Friday, February 03, 2006 11:31:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A very rare building.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

My weekly page update:
missing image - tekuto3sm.jpg
Magritte's in Tokyo, Japan by Atelier Tekuto.

The updated book feature is Living Big in Small Apartments, by James Grayson Trulove.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
B******s to Architecture
"Irreverent opinion on (mainly UK) architecture and architects" (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

Hello Beautiful! Blog
Aka "Teatro Lifson", a new blog for the weekly arts show on Chicago Public Radio.

dialog
"Blogging directly from New York City about architecture and other interesting things." (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Rob decided to pass along some annoyance, though I rather like this sorta thing. So here goes:

Four jobs I've had:
1. Caddy
2. Vegetable preparer (I washed lettuce in a basin full of cold, cold H20)
3. Dishwasher
4. Bookstore clerk
Four films I can watch repeatedly:
1. Groundhog Day (no joke)
2. Being John Malkovich
3. School of Rock (formerly Dazed & Confused)
4. Taxi Driver
Four places I've lived:
1. Northbrook
2. Manhattan (The Little Apple)
3. Castiglion Fiorentino
4. Chicago (4 places in the city, coincidentially...wait. 5 actually)
Four television programs I like to watch:
1. The Simpsons
2. Lost
3. This Old House
4. Poirot Mysteries (on dvd)
Four places I've been to on vacation:
1. Italy
2. Japan
3. Wales
4. New York City
Four of my favorite dishes:
1. Grilled Cheese
2. Pancakes
3. Pesto
4. A good cheeseburger
Four websites I visit daily:
1. Bloglines (most of my "browsing" these days)
2. Archinect
3. The Archi-Tourist (Another plug for my latest undertaking)
4. Yahoo! Mail (yea, I know, kinda boring)
Four places I would rather be right now:
1. In a piazza somewhere in Italy
2. Under a canopy of stars (or somewhere where I can at least see stars)
3. At a bookstore
4. On the couch
Four bloggers I am annoying:
1. Eric (it's about time for an update on your page)
2. Neal
3. Frank (that should be easy, seeing you've already done it)
4. Marcus

3 Comments:

At Sunday, January 29, 2006 3:04:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

bee pee seez:

I'll take that challenge....

1 Four jobs I've had:
-landscaping
-bookstore clerk
-frozen yougurt sales
-triple 'a' student painter

2. Four films I can watch repeatedly:
-the big lebowski
-the usual suspects
-donnie darko
-koyaanisqatsi

3. Four places I've lived:
-blacksburg, va
-charleston, sc
-chicago, il
-brooklyn, ny

4. Four television programs I like to watch:
-the simpsons
-the west wing
-project runway (sad but true...my lady is a fashion designer...)
-frontline

5. Four places I've been to on vacation:
-semester abroad in europe (14 countires - a working vacation indeed)
-hallschtatt, austria
-crested butte, colorado
-charleston, sc (my favorite place in the world so far)

6. Four of my favorite dishes:
-my girlfriends lasagna
-fanelli's cheesburger @ lunch with a brooklyn lager
-thanksgiving dinner
-two eggs over medium, sausage links, hashbrowns extra well done and an engilish muffin well done also, coffee

7. Four websites I visit daily:
-archidose.blogspot.com (whoo hoo...big plug htere hilltown)
-ny times
-yahoo (me too, boring)
-nyarchitects.com (always looking for the next job)

8. Four places I would rather be right now:
-in the perfect run down hole in the wall with a beer/coffee, pouring rain and a killer book
-my ass in an eames lounge chair in my living room with a beer/coffee, pouring rain and a killer book
-'the cellar' in blacksburg, va. best bar EVER!
-fishing

9. Four bloggers (people) I am annoying:
-my girlfriend
-my employers
-my family
-the person beside me

 
At Sunday, February 05, 2006 1:14:00 PM, Blogger Jason said...

Nice. Now you ought to go back and add answers for the categories Eric added, cause they are neato.

 
At Tuesday, February 07, 2006 10:24:00 AM, Blogger John said...

Sure thingo.

Four places I've never been but would like to visit:

1. Chaco Canyon
2. New Zealand
3. Scandinavia
4. Tunisia (just for the night)

Four differences in my alternate universe:

1. The ability to see in all wavelengths, at will.
2. Pee trees everywhere
3. An odor of maple syrup all the time...wait! there's a place that already has that?! I'm moving there!
4. Portable pancakes.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, January 27, 2006

An interesting building and installation over at the always-reliable we-make-money-not-art:

Missing image - gown.jpg
A ball gown made of steel
A small apartment building in The Hague by Archipelontwerpers reminiscent of Frank Gehry's "Fred and Ginger" building in Prague.

Missing image - dark-places.jpg
Dark places
A badass looking installation for the Dark Places exhibition at the Santa Monica Museum of Art by Servo, like something out of a sci-fi movie.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Glancing around CAF's Exhibitions page, I found a link to the web page competition: public process for public architecture, which is currently on display in the Cityspace Gallery. Curated by Edward Keegan, "the exhibition will introduce the general public to the competition process for selecting the architect or the design of a building," specifically American buildings. The case studies include:
:: The White House (1792)
:: Tribune Tower (1922)
:: Vietnam Veterans Memorial (1980)
:: Harold Washington Library (1988)
:: World Trade Center (2002-present)
:: Freedom Museum (2005-present)
The extremely thorough and graphic-heavy site* should keep you busy for a while, especially with the local Freedom Museum (housed in the 1922 Tribune competition building), set to open this spring.

*Inexplicably, the exhibition is hosted on the web site of Cynthia Plaster Caster, an artist who "began making plaster casts of rock stars' erect penises in 1968...[and] in 2000 she began casting breasts as well."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

The Chicago Tribune posts graphics and images (registration req'd) for the Wrigley Field bleachers renovation, part of a larger plan that also includes a parking garage, restaurants and retail.

Missing image - cubs2.jpg

For the passer-by, the most notable change will be the walkway will cantilever over the sidewalk.

Missing image - cubs3.jpg

Granted this ain't exciting architecture, but it's been a heated debate...

Missing image - cubs4.jpg

...because of these neighbors and their right to peer into Wrigley Field during games, charging admission and receiving $$ that might otherwise go to the Cubs (and its parent, the Chicago Tribune). Notice the construction at the bottom of the image.

5 Comments:

At Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:54:00 PM, Anonymous amene said...

hi john ,i m an architect from iran and read ur blog , it s very good and it s usuefull for me!
email:ad3402@yahoo.com

 
At Thursday, January 26, 2006 3:34:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

Top reason to not like the Cubs:

They don't care if the fans want to watch. They care if the fans pay.

Considering a limited number of people can live there and peer into the stadium, I say its great that people have that opportunity. Wrigley should allow them to, because what's baseball other than a form of entertainment?

 
At Thursday, January 26, 2006 4:55:00 PM, Blogger John said...

bryan, I agree in principle but the majority of the rooftops looking over Wrigley Field are run by private businesses that sell tickets (rain or shine, no refund). Granted they're not bad venues, what with food and drinks and air conditioned interiors (since they occupy basically the whole of the building), but I think it's a rare treat to live there and have your own rooftop view of the field. That's probably why TribCo feels the need to (partially) block their views.

 
At Friday, January 27, 2006 3:56:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I see now, those are bleachers on top of those buildings. And charging to sit there does change things.

I then wonder, why doesn't TribCo (TribCo = Tribune Company = the newspaper Tribune?) doesn't buy the whole block then.

 
At Sunday, January 29, 2006 11:21:00 PM, Blogger Jennifer said...

Frankly, that stadium hasn't been the same since they got rid of the Yum Yum Donuts in the west side parking lot.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Last April I posted about an ongoing project Initiated by A. Laurie Palmer with support from Gallery 400 at the University of Illinois at Chicago called Notions of Expenditure, a "request for speculative proposals to re-design exercise equipment to generate and store energy; and/or to retrofit gyms to function as local power sources linked to the grid."

Missing image - notions.jpg

At the time there were only two projects uploaded, but now there's close to twenty, worthy of an updated post here. Also, the comments to my earlier post have recently attracted people undertaking similar endeavors who have questions I unfortunately can't answer. So look those over, and if you can help them out, please do.

2 Comments:

At Wednesday, January 25, 2006 3:52:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

Suddenly a bunch of ideas came to me. I'll make a list and put it up somewhere. One being: attaching a belt and generator to revolving doors on the entrances to hospitals and skyscrapers to store up electricity for night lighting those very doors.

 
At Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:47:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Not bad.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

My friend Brandon brought this small building to my attention, and now I'm passing it along to you, dear readers.

Missing image - HD21a.jpg

Winner of a 2005 AR Award for Emerging Architecture, this showroom by Stuttgart-based FNP Architekten is a renovation of a pigsty, the humorous relationship between these two uses apparent in the project's parenthetical naming (saustall=pigsty; schaustall=showroom).

Missing image - HD21b.jpg

To deal with the crumbling 18th-century structure, the architects created a "house within a house", a wood container that fit within the old stone walls but without touching them.

Missing image - HD21c.jpg

A new roof protects old and new from the elements. The awards jury mentions that the existing windows now look fashionably random, even though they are derived from the building's original function, a decidedly humorous take on the renovation. In the end, the project is more dignified than humorous, the architects able to extend the life of an old building through simple yet clever means.

Links:
:: FNP Architekten
:: AR Award (PDF link)
:: DBZ-online

Labels:

4 Comments:

At Wednesday, January 25, 2006 7:45:00 PM, Blogger J said...

Wow, that thing is cool. I hope more people take the time to trasure their old buildings this way! What are we going to do when the cruddy buildings in suburbia crumble? Well, they'll rot, not crumble. Something to work on...

 
At Thursday, January 26, 2006 4:49:00 PM, Anonymous marcus said...

fantastic.

 
At Monday, January 30, 2006 5:00:00 AM, Blogger Helen said...

Much more inspiring than any of the glitzy tower blocks I've seen in the journals lately.

 
At Monday, January 15, 2007 2:03:00 PM, Blogger Chuck said...

Wow, that kinda neat. Rebuilding homes.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 23, 2006

My weekly page update:
missing image - onix4sm.jpg
Fujy House near Madrid, Spain by Fujy Sustainable Architects.

The updated book feature is Commodification and Spectacle in Architecture, edited by William S. Saunders.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Progressive Reactionary
"How is architecture affected by the political climate? More importantly, how can architecture affect the political climate itself?" (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

butter paper
"Australian and new zealand architecture and design resources." (added to sidebar under online journals)

ArchitectureINK
"Architecture Ink is brought to you by creative designers and observant citizens from around the world." (added to sidebar under online journals)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, January 22, 2006

I'm not talking about jeans, I'm talking about buildings. In places like Chicago, tall buildings tend to get all the press. But not all sites are suitable for 30+ story condo and office towers - especially with the city's parking requirements - so the occasional low-rise building rises with a bit of flair or at least some design sense. The best the city has seen lately is definitely Ralph Johnson's Contemporaine in River North. But has that design spawned more quality output? Let's look at some recent and under-construction buildings and see.

Missing image - low-rise1.jpg
630 North Franklin

This eleven-story residential building in River North is by the same developer as the Contemporaine, CMK Companies. Credited to both Brininstool + Lynch and Perkins + Will on the Emporis web site, the design is more flat and restrained than the Contemporaine. Half the residences face the street, while the other half face the back alley. The only corner units face the elevated tracks, a somewhat unfortunate circumstance. Both the units and the building are ultimately pretty typical, only clad in a a full-height window wall with a random window pattern as an attempt to give it distinction. The "band of light" at the parking garage looks like it could give further distinction at night.

Missing image - low-rise2.jpg
156 West Superior

Just down the street from 630 North Franklin is a narrow, nine-story residential building by Seattle's Miller Hull Partnership, developed by Ranquist Development whose tastefully modern houses and small condos dot the Chicago's west side. This design appears to be a departure for Ranquist, as Miller Hull strives to relate to "the Chicago steel and glass I.I.T. School." An exposed steel frame with diagonal cross-bracing is articulated in front of a full-height glass wall on the building's south and north facades. Balconies anchor the southeast and northeast corners and a mix of masonry and metal panel covers the side elevations. While the bracing doesn't stand, as in the Hancock, its subtle presence gives the facade a layering and depth not found in many multi-family residences these days.

Missing image - low-rise3.jpg
HUB 116

Further south, but still in the River North neighborhood, is HUB 116 (a seemingly techno-savvy name that is actually just a truncation of its address: 116 West Hubbard), an eight-story office building developed by Dumas Associates and designed by Obora-Phillips. The distinctive feature here is obviously the swiss-cheese roof that's cantilevered from leaning columns, apparently extending the roof beyond the street facade. The rendering clearly shows a post-modern articulation of base-middle-top, a tripartite division that architect's can't seem to abandon. Here, unfortunately, the changes are abrupt, without apparent relationship to each other or the building's context.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, January 20, 2006

As you can see from my paltry posts lately, this week has been busy. To partially make up for this, I've provided some links below that will hopefully be of interest and are worth a look and/or a read.
:: A bookstore organized by color (via)
:: Hidden Landmarks of Manhattan
:: Defying Death (on Arakawa)
:: Scandal Becomes Her
:: Green Yale Degree
:: Cardinals Stadium (by Peter Eisenman, below)

Missing image - cardinals.jpg

:: Two films to see
:: Map of World Heritage Properties
:: The Bird Man
:: Renzo Piano Interview
:: Now you see it...
As always, many links via.

4 Comments:

At Friday, January 20, 2006 4:15:00 PM, Anonymous marcus said...

That bookstore is cool.

I used to organise my CDs that way. Before i put them in a box never to be seen again...

 
At Friday, January 20, 2006 4:27:00 PM, Blogger Bryan said...

I saw a bit on that bookstore a while back. Twas nothing more than a publicity stunt on their part. Worked great though. http://www.adobebooks.org/

Too bad about Sipson, but they knew the town was coming to an end anyways, with Heathrow being next door and all.

 
At Friday, January 20, 2006 6:18:00 PM, Blogger John said...

Regardless, I could easily spend a weekend doing something similar with my library at home. Pointless and silly but something I would dig.

As for Sipson, I sure hope they don't break down the pubs and ship 'em around the world as "authentic" pubs. Chicago has one of those and it sure doesn't need another.

 
At Saturday, March 11, 2006 11:02:00 AM, Blogger blogdollar2 said...

hi, i am learning about blogs and like what you did in yours, I have a blog about links. PLease come visit.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Once again Taschen goes over the top, this time with Richard Meier.

Missing image - taschen-meier.jpg

This Artist's Limited Edition (100 copies worldwide, including a signed and numbered print) is a steal at only $1500...well, it's a steal compared to a multi-million dollar condo in one of his Perry Street towers.

(Thanks again to Jeff S. for feeding me the good stuff)

1 Comments:

At Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:47:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

good source famous architects

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Taschen is set to publish four books in its Contemporary Architecture by Country series: Switzerland, Japan, Netherlands, and United Kingdom in April. Like the publisher's other architecture titles, such as the Architecture Now! series, these promise to be full of delectable eye candy.

Missing image - taschen4.jpg

(via dezain)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

In the Sun-Times today, David Roeder has a good piece about the GSA's interest in the Berghoff property, bringing into question the circumstances behind the family's closing of the restaurant (set for February 28). Beyond that unofficial speculation, the article tries to illuminate the city's landmark policy, which rated close to 10,000 buildings in the city about a decade ago (transcribed below). Note: these ratings are separate from official Chicago landmarks.
WHAT COLOR IS A SHADOW LANDMARK?

The City of Chicago developed a kind of shadow landmark system by color-coding buildings that might have architectural or historic importance. A shadow designation is easier to impose than official landmark status. The highest ratings are red and orange. Any attempt to demolish a red- or orange-rated building triggers a 90-day hold on permits while city employees determine whether the property should be saved.

RED BUILDINGS
Red buildings have the highest ratings. There are 171 red buildings in Chicago, of which 140 are official landmarks.
Examples include:
Carson Pirie Scott store, 1 S. State
City landmark? Yes
Wrigley Building, 410 N. Michigan
City landmark? No
Merchandise Mart, 222 Merchandise Mart Plaza
City landmark? No
Rookery Building, 209 S. La Salle
City landmark? Yes
Marshall Field, 111 N. State
City landmark? No

ORANGE BUILDINGS
Orange buildings are deemed slightly less significant than red buildings. About 9,600 properties carry the designation. Few are city landmarks, but many are within landmark districts, thus limiting an owner's right to alter or raze them.
Examples include:
Oriental Theatre, 32 W. Randolph
City landmark? No
Palmer House, 17 E. Monroe
City landmark? No
Holy Name Cathedral, 735 N. State
City landmark? No
Drake Hotel, 140 E. Walton
City landmark? Yes
Chicago Daily News building, 400 W. Madison
City landmark? No

RETAILING LANDMARKS?
Both the Marshall Field's and Carson Pirie Scott stores are Chicago icons and designated "red" buildings. One is a landmark and one isn't.
But as we can see by the city's recent behavior (PDF link), these colored designations can sometimes lose their meaning and purpose.

1 Comments:

At Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:53:00 AM, Anonymous Selbourne said...

Hi,

I have checked your website and found it very interesting.

Regards,
Web Design Company

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Core77 reports that "The School of the Art Institute of Chicago...is adding three new graduate programs in Fall '06: Architecture, Interior Architecture, and Designed Objects." (Another new degree the school will also be offering is a Master of Arts in Visual and Critical Studies.)

Tonight from 6-9pm, the school is hosting a chat specific to the design programs mentioned above. More information here.

1 Comments:

At Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:50:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

rumor has it that SAIC is cooking up plans to create an art journalism program as well as a PhD program in art studio (akin to those in Europe)!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 16, 2006

My weekly page update:
missing image - onix4sm.jpg
Ecologic Farm in Haren, Netherlands by Onix.

The updated book feature is Seven Interviews with Tadao Ando, by Michael Auping.

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
Subtopia
"A field guide to military urbanism," by Archinect editors Bryan Finoki and Geoff Manaugh. (added to sidebar under blogs::urban)

archipedia
"The free open-content atlas for world architecture that anyone can edit." (added to sidebar under guides)

Wikitecture
"Wikitecture is the online Wiki for architects, architecture students, and anyone who wants to know anything about architecture...[it] is meant to be a resource for those who want to learn more about architecture."

2 Comments:

At Monday, January 16, 2006 4:04:00 PM, Blogger Bryan Finoki said...

thanks for the mention John!

 
At Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:06:00 AM, Blogger John said...

No problem, bryan. Glad to see a new blog, and quite an interesting topic.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, January 15, 2006

The Modern List is an impressive new site "for the design conscious interested in experiencing modern architecture, design, art, food and culture."

Missing image - modernlist.jpg

At the moment, only Manhattan and Seattle are available, though more are in the works, including Chicago.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

A couple recent posts indicate a trend, or backlash, against anti-sprawl advocates and towards pro-sprawl positions that see the phenomenon as not only a good thing, but something natural and unavoidable, a trend that finds its greatest voice in Robert Bruegmann's Sprawl.

First, Safety Neal posts on a Joel Kotkin piece in the Wall Street Journal. The author specifically discusses sprawl in Portland, Oregon, a city that enacted legislation to halt sprawl. Apparently it backfired in Portland by pushing development even further out from the city. Kotkin goes on to quote statistics that confirm what pretty much everybody knows: people like the suburbs.

Basically Kotkin indicates that sprawl continues unabated, despite widespread criticism of it and legislation against it. Neal asserts "our current patterns of consumption and overpopulation cannot continue unabated," even though "we will continue to see the growth of suburbia into farmland, wetlands, and wilderness areas." Climate change, dwindling resources, and soil erosion - among other concerns - will eventually steer us away from sprawl and its harmful ways. But, like Neal, I can't raise a toast to suburbia and its decedent ways.

Second, Mr. Massengale posts a link to "A Car in Every Garage" by Margy Waller, who states,
To be a fully functioning citizen in this country today, a car is a virtual necessity; so the federal government should subsidize a set of wheels and the commute to work.
This position is completely uncritical of the suburbs and sprawl, much like other proponents of these non-urban conditions. There's a pervasive confidence in the market, that people voice their opinions not only by voting but by spending money. Hence the rise in popularity of hybrid cars and the dip in SUV sales; people are saying they want fuel efficient cars. But this belief system only goes so far, most noticeably because it is myopic and unconcerned with environmental and other negative, long-term impacts. To have the government give subsidize driving would speed up many of the concerns mentioned in regards to Neal's post above, while also creating even more dependence upon automobiles at a time when we should be finding ways to broaden transportation options.

Waller's argument is ultimately liberal, focused on low-income families and individuals. She's trying to find a way to bring more and better job opportunities to those who can't afford automobiles. She admits her plan is costly ($100 billion/yr) and argues that it would be better than programs to increase public transportation, though she doesn't seem to address the discrepancy between where low-income people live and where they work, nor the displacement of the same people from the cities to peripheral suburbs. These are part of the problem, too, though her solution is more of a short-term, band-aid solution than a long-term one.

2 Comments:

At Monday, January 16, 2006 12:25:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not sure I'd agree that Portland's attempt to halt sprawl "backfired". What it did do was maintain green space around the city rather than creating a sea of asphalt. I would further argue that the suburbs are "pushed out" no further in Portland than the suburbs surrounding Atlanta, LA, Chicago, or Detroit. There are a host or reasons why people are attracted to suburbs including home ownership, safety, pollution and consumption. Cities have historically been challenging to live in. I understand the stench in Chicago was unbearable 100 years ago and I couldn't imagine living with the amount of soot permitted 50 years ago. The more intriguing issue is who would you prefer designing your community...a planner or a developer.

 
At Monday, January 16, 2006 11:40:00 PM, Anonymous will said...

(i would prefer a planner to design a community, or a developer with a bit of ambition would be fine too. status quo is just not gonna do, is it)

the "sprawl" book is not particularly in support of sprawl, as i see it. bruegman is just pointing out that anti-sprawl sentiment is not making intelligent use a great deal of information in its dogmatic response; resulting in post-mod decorative towns like seaside and kentlands that have very little to do with reality and are in any case only for the wealthy. new urbanism has a great many good points but its focus on coercing a new culture through built environment is not realistic and its commentators are increasingly vitriolic (kunstler is the worst; an intelligent man who will spin and ignore the truth to make a point, sad to say. his good points are too often overwhelmed by the outright untruths he often spouts).

growth limits have been known to cause problems for at least 50 years, but the trade off is the maintenance of a green belt for the wealthy who can afford to live in the city proper and am sure they are happy with it. London is the best example of this and portland not so far off. it was never intended to be equitable, and the poor were expected to move outside of its limits...

i live in tokyo where the very nicely planned green belt was all but overwhelmed by builing long ago (no enforcement laws here) except for a few swathes of green here and there; and i would love it if that green bit were a bit larger, but even though i live in the city proper it would still take me nearly an hour to get to the belt by subway; the city is simply that large (30 million popn). my own view is that a less wholistic repsonse would have served the city better than the very lovely graphic plan they were unable to enforce when reality intervened...

in a rambling way i suppose i am trying to make the point that car-culture and suburbs need to be responded to rather than merely reacted to, and that means we have to give up a few of the anti-sprawl dogmatic positions if we are going to make a dent on the real problems of the status quo.

massengale is not an open-minded fellow, and i can understand his noble anger at the current condition, but raging against the machine is not very useful when you aren't the one with the power to pull the plug.

asa n aside, i grew up in a traditional new urbanist community when they were the places only poor people could afford, and i really am all for that lifestyle. i haven't owned a car since high school, walk to do my groceries, take a subway to work and play, live in communal housing, even work to maintain a realtionship with my neighbors. and i really can't stand suburbia. but i don't think for a minute it is my job. or right, to tell anyone else to live the way i do. that is just far too fascist for me. and the moernists showed us well enough that fascism and planning are not the best mix...somehting the new urbanists might think about.

anyway thats my three cents (i only wanted to put in two, but was watching kunstler on the tele yesterday and he really does drive me up the wall. apologies...;-) )

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, January 14, 2006

The sun finally made an appearance in Chicago today.

Missing image - sunny2.jpg
The scenic view out my living room window.

6 Comments:

At Saturday, January 14, 2006 10:54:00 PM, Blogger petrol said...

A most excellent view! (:

 
At Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:05:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

whatever

 
At Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:28:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

yes, but she has yet to come out in seattle... sigh. what is architecture without shadows, i ask

 
At Sunday, January 15, 2006 4:03:00 PM, Blogger Andy Marshall said...

Strap pointing - cause of such distress to the brick as well as the vista;)

 
At Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:12:00 PM, Anonymous deanna said...

Fabulous view! Embrace your structurally sound (and now sunny) brick facade. It could be worse.
BTW~ I think I saw John Burcher on the metro the other day. Is he in dc?

 
At Friday, January 20, 2006 3:51:00 AM, Anonymous JoeBoris said...

Well, it isn't like anyone's likely to annoyingly peer in through you livingroom window. So I guess the cup is half full...?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Steven Holl's design for the Bloch Building addition to the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City, MO has seen its fair share of controversey, long before its 2007 completion date. While these exterior photographs probably won't quiet any skeptics, they should give people a better idea of what to expect come completion.

These were sent to me by my old classmate Jeff who currently resides in Kansas City, though we don't know the author of these photos. If that's you, let me know and I'll give you credit here.

Missing image - nelson-atkins1.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins2.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins3.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins4.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins5.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins6.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins7.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins8.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins9.jpg

Update 01.12: In response to KevinS's question/comment, the answer appears to be "yes...and no":

Missing image - nelson-atkins11.jpg

Missing image - nelson-atkins10.jpg

17 Comments:

At Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:33:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Controversial, yes. Beautiful, yes. I can't wait for the addition to open. Kansas City is going to be a new presence on the architectural map in a couple of years. Big, big projects happening here!

 
At Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:28:00 AM, Anonymous marcus said...

If I remember correctly, the controversy was around people feeling that the building as built was not turning out like the competetion images. ie. Like glowing light boxes.

From the night time images, it seems like the building is precisely as it was represented. It looks beautiful.

 
At Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:27:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, the sandblasted channel glass during the day tends to have a dull, opaque appearance (except sometimes at corners where sunlight passes through). At night, obviously it glows. Also, obviously, this nighttime condition was represented in publicity images. I think it's understandable that locals are concerned, but they will likely come around once the building is open.

 
At Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:35:00 PM, Blogger KevinS said...

Does the interior glow as nicely during the day as the exterior glows at night?

 
At Thursday, January 12, 2006 6:28:00 PM, Anonymous danny s said...

i belive this is going to be a great project to get kansas city on the map for more contemporary building design. the city is still a bit conservative in its tastes, but there are many projects that are in process/construction that will help to change that.

 
At Friday, January 13, 2006 12:25:00 AM, Anonymous Matt said...

The Nelson-Atkins design isn't even in the same league as the de Young Museum ( http://thomasmayerarchive.de/categories.php?cat_id=852&l=english )
I live in KC and I'm far from conservative in my taste for design.

The Nelson-Atkins addition is't what it could have been - and should be - especially for the amount of time and money invested. I was at BNIM during the entire time the drawings where in-house. I've seen every working drawing, every water color, every model, and every rendering (at least those that made it to KC). I toured the project about 3 months ago and I do believe the interior spaces with be absolutely phenomenal - but the exterior of the building has ruined the prospect of it ever amounting to a world class project. Don't get me wrong the critics will love it and I think it has some really nice moments - but I don't believe this project was a priority for Steven Holl (and his right-hand man Chris McVoy apparently couldn't handle it alone).

Holl was absolutely spot on in conceiving the addition "conceptually". An underground scheme is really the only way to graciously add on to this building. There's however an unfortunate reality to the design competition. Holl thought that the slope of the site would accommodate the design better than it did (and apparently it was too late to resolve it - in late schematics - when the topo and soil boring were done). Soon everyone in KC will see that what was intended to be an underground addition will in reality be a series of tacky board form concrete retaining walls and landscaped terraces along the edge of a historic and upscale, neighborhood. It's all been relatively well hidden from public sight by the construction fencing thus far - but it's starting to raise it's ugly head over the top of the fence.

I suppose a museum is really about the art though. I think the interior is a fantastic piece of artwork in it's own right but like so many mesuems today I unfortunately don't think it's going to be a very good place to hang art (perhaps it will just be a really big sculpture gallery?). The interior spaces do have a fantastic glowing quality created by the exterior channel glass. It should - there was an unheard of amount of time and energy that went into researching and testing the channel glass and the inner capillary system (by Okalux). Conversely the glass channels on the exterior of the building have a dull effect in the daylight that makes them look like cheap, sheet metal wall panels (only without the added drama achieved by oil canning) -- and worse yet for some reason no one could get the composition or proportions for the horizontal aluminum breaks in the channels to look nice (where's the attention to detail Steven? We deserved more involvement than your initial water colors!)

I've seen this project from several blocks away to inches away; from 6 in the morning till midnight - and I'll be surprised if it's published with more than 2 or 3 photos of the exterior in the daylight (and we all know it will get published- this is Steven Holl we're talking about!). Expect to see lots of interior photos - and if the interior lighting of the glass lenses is ever resolved it will also look remarkable in the dark!

The good news for Steven Holl is it will always be better than the two Moshe Sofdie projects underway in Kansas City... the bad news for KC is Holl has left us with one of his crappiest projects to date!

 
At Friday, January 13, 2006 2:01:00 PM, Anonymous woodrow said...

WOW -

As a former Kansas Citian who has been following this project very closely, matt's comments are the first negative comments that aren't just "oooh, it's stupid." His knowledge and discussion of specifics indicate some serious thought. Because of that, I worry about the overall exterior, especially the east facade (the concrete walls). I actually like the board form walls, but did not expect them to be so prominent.

The Nelson updated their website with MANY new photos (Jan. 13)

http://nelson-atkins.org/expansion/index.cfm

The Bloch building pic's do show fairly massive exterior walls. I just am hoping that they won't seem overwhelming.

As to the glass, I think it will be alright. No question that it will be photographed mainly at night and in the magic hours of dawn and dusk. I was there in Sept. and Nov. and while somewhat flat at a distance, it positively shimmers up close.

There are also pictures here -

http://www.kcskyscrapers.com/newforum/index.php?topic=5569.460

Also, much heated debate

 
At Friday, January 13, 2006 2:51:00 PM, Anonymous woodrow said...

They have updated the Nelson website since I posted. More exterior with landscape shots and many more interior. Interior? Super.

 
At Friday, January 13, 2006 3:21:00 PM, Anonymous epochedifice said...

I will reserve comment regarding the Nelson-Atkins addition design for the day I experience the building in person. I would like to say, from my observations, as an internationally renowned architect gaining commissions across the globe, Holl’s buildings in every experience I have had unfolds into a series of disappointments. In brief, the concepts as pictured in books and watercolor I admit are poetic and moving, though once realized suffer from a lack of detail and typically are spatialy and proportionally clumsy and have a confused material dialog.

Hopfully the Nelson-Atkins is a departure.

 
At Saturday, January 14, 2006 9:38:00 AM, Blogger amy said...

this website keeps me well amused during working hours and offers new thoughts for my impending doom, sorry i meant thesis ... i hope you dont mind, but i have linked you in my blog for my friends to find you too
ta

 
At Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:53:00 AM, Blogger Marc Fink said...

The glowing custom channel glass at the Nelson-Atkins addition was created with LINIT channel glass distributed in North America by Bendheim Wall Systems and produced in Germany by Lamberts, www.nelson-atkins.org/expansion/bloch_glass.cfm. The channel glass installed in KC is even more unusual in character than the channel glass installed on the center section of Higgins Hall at Pratt, designed by the firms of Steven Holl and Rogers Marvel. The light scattering ability of the LINIT glass is enhanced by Okapane, an acrylic insulating interlayer from Schott. Either the concept moves you or it doesn't. As for the execution of the concept, the building will not open until 2007 and since the interior lighting is not yet at a final stage, comments regarding the effects of interior lighting are premature. For other LINIT projects, go to www.bendheimwall.com and if you have questions about using LINIT channel glass for your distinctive projects, call Marc Fink at BWS, 800-221-7379.

 
At Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:29:00 PM, Anonymous martha said...

The photos on your blog are nice, and I have seen the almost moonlike glow after dark. They do not reflect the perspective from my car as I round the corners of the site daily, dreading the view, which for me is gut-wrenching. However, I would like to focus on more objective issues, such as:
-the change from the plan, wherein the project would provide "lenses"-not a trailer-park motif (think the Clinton Library), and not translucent channel glass. There was no community buy-in of this change, or even any announcement until the construction was obvious.
-The design would be remarkable in the suburbs, on the prairie, in the context of other contemporary buildings, and seen from a distance.
-There is much talk of urban design, but we would not see this heart-of-the-city project in Chicago or New York. 21st-century projects are designed to draw the public in, but the new Nelson has eliminated the run-in-for-a quick-visit (even with a stroller or bad knees) horseshoe drive. The friendly gingko trees that provided art in every season? Gone. The sculpture garden, visible from Rockhill Road? Gone somewhere. And of course, the lovely concrete wall landscaping that shuts out thousands of people everyday- physically, visually and aurally- it looks to be here for generations. That green stuff is probably overrated, anyway.

There. I hope I made a valid point(that there are legitimate drawbacks no one in the art field will own up to) without mentioning the beaux arts, or lifting the human condition, or industrial parks.
Only add a prayer for the Nelson trustees, good stewards who probably haven't slept well in months, and the future trustees, who will have difficulty funding a capital project of this magnitude for many years.
-from a passionate lover of great art and great architecture.

 
At Friday, June 23, 2006 6:05:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I must admit that I was quite apprehensive about the Holl design as I saw the building slowly taking shape. I work for the Nelson and have had the opportunity to view the inside on two occasions (once in the very early stages and again about 6 months ago when the interior walls were going up.) My feelings about the building up until about three weeks ago were that the inside would be breathtaking and amazing, while the outside would take much more getting used to. However, this all changed with the recent re-opening of Rockhill Road. When I drove down the road and saw the glass walls elegantly protuding from the green landscape of the Kansas City Sculpture Park (which officially opens in September), I actually had goosebumps. Now, I firmly believe that Steven Holl's design is brilliant, innovative, and beautiful. The controversey surrounding this project is a testament to the fact that no project should be judged before completion. Everyone who visits the Nelson-Atkins next year to witness this magnificent building for themselves is in for an amazing experience.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:31:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As someone who had a close association to Holl at the time that this project was going through DD, I can say that he did pay attention to it—as much as he could, given that he has a busy practice. He was involved in all of the design decisions and internal meetings.

But there was also quite a bit of internal wrangling about how to ghet the budget to meet the eloquent original vision for the project. This is something that high-design architects always face: they win competitions based on beautiful ideas, but then clients can't admit that those beautiful ideas will cost more than they'd hoped to spend. The channel-glass wall on the N-A was indeed expensive, but it could have been more true to the renderings with additional expense. Any failure is not Holl's alone...the project had a client, and a builder, and fundraisers.

By the way, no building is a facsimile of its competition renderings. Have you seen the facade of the new Walker? Nothing like the original crinkled depictions...

One thing I will say about Holl's office, however, is that the project manager and project architects working on a given project have a HUGE effect on whether the thing turns out well or not. Holl has good and bad buildings. Some of that is due to him; some is due to who else was involved.

 
At Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:10:00 PM, Anonymous woodrow said...

What is all this talk of failure? I think that it will be amazing. Every time I am in KC I visit the N-A and am a bit obsessive about following the progress of the addition.

Unlike Martha, I think one of the more successful outcomes of the addition is what has happened to the north entrance. Lens 1 and the new entrance plaza, as well as the cleaning of the stone, have created a truly monumental public space. I also am excited about the new additions to the KC Sculpture Park, which seems to have increased in numbers of works and visibility. The massing of the lenses is truly fine.

The interiors really do look magical. I hope that they are as awe-inspiring in person as in photos.

I am optimistic that the new galleries will provide an attractive and effective space to view art. Walking through the re-hung and re-imagined galleries of the N-A building has certainly been hugely satisfiying.

I think this project has reinvigorated the Nelson and I for one am quite excited to see the project finally realized.

 
At Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:40:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just wanted to leave a link to a series of interior photos.

http://www.flickr.com/groups/stevenholl/pool/with/375596121/

I agree that the exterior probably did not come together as well as it could have. The building really doesn't seem to be underground so much as it seems just covered with ground. These photos show where it is going to shine, on the interior!

 
At Sunday, July 08, 2007 9:09:00 PM, Anonymous Jim B said...

Holl's Bloch addition to the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City MO is a grotesque growth on a stately facade.
The irritation increases as the sun sets and these dumpsters illuminate and glow obfuscating the elegant, imposing and stately original structure.
Hopefully this bacterium is an illusion or tongue-in-cheek prank by a freshman art class. I do believe (as Dorothy believed she would return to her Kansas home) that KCMO's sanitation department will soon remove these enormous glow-in-the-dark containers to transport them to a construction site where they can fulfill their purpose for years to come.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

As Built is a monograph on the London studio Caruso St. John Architects, published by a+t ediciones. a+t publishes some damn fine - but pricey - magazines twice a year.

Missing image - aplust.jpg

Although I've featured St. John's work on my weekly page, I'm not familiar with much of his work, though I feel I should be. It has a quiet appeal, a certain calm that's refreshing these days.

Missing image - aplust2.jpg

As the editors put it well enough, the studio "has carried out a series of projects that is characterized by coherence, sobriety, and a search for emotion through built reality."

Labels:

1 Comments:

At Sunday, January 15, 2006 5:46:00 AM, Blogger Luke Jones said...

Caruso St John is in fact Peter Caruso and Colin St John, not any single person.

The pair of them used to teach at my school, London Metropolitan.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

First a church by Sullivan on Chicago's south side, now a house by Wright in nearby Gary, Indiana. Unfortunately (or is it fortunately?), the pre-fire condition of the Wynant House - built ca. 1915 for the president of a local insurance company - wasn't much better than its post-fire condition, below.

Missing image - wynant.jpg

It's been determined that "torches used by workers putting final touches on a new church roof sparked the blaze" at Pilgrim Baptist Church, though the cause of the Wynant House fire has yet to be determined.

(via Archinect)

4 Comments:

At Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:22:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

brandon seez:

i say architecture is not invincible. given its pre-fire condition, this is not such a bad terminus. makes me think of the bon jovi son.....'shot down in a blaze of glory'. obviously people did not want to restore it. the additional plywood skin would have sent a wave of rave through architects and buffs alike if this building held any weight in their understanding and appreciation of architecture. besides, i think that not all but a good portion of architectural preservation/restoration of modern structures of significance results in a building that will ultimately be a museum of sorts with a very limited audience, purged of its original function. to me that is where the problem is with a lot of these projects. especially the pope-lehey house outside of DC. they picked it up, moved it down the road due to one of the many beltway additions and reset it 35 degrees off its original axis. and upon entry and throughout the tour, the guide (whose only knowledge of the master comes from a single 8 1/2 x 11 sheet of info she carries) cant seem to stop telling you that he calculated the angle of the light and how it would hit a particular surface just so....."you se it! right there!" i really didn't have the heart to tell her. i do feel the need to preserve and restore, but not every FLW work is a masterpiece and this one is clearly does not fit that bill.

 
At Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:00:00 PM, Anonymous jd. said...

Ahhhh! a purist... how refreshing... but this morning as I was walking by the Medinah Temple, Chicago, I decided that I perfered the perversion of capitalism w/in the sacred shell than, just another box.
With so little invention in contemporary construction, rotting, transposed or "perserved" artifacts add depth and texture, to an increasingly thin, flat built environment.

 
At Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:49:00 PM, Blogger Michael Allen said...

Very sad. The last time I was in Gary, I skipped out on looking at this house. I had just met with the city planner and he told me that there was little more than the walls and roof left, so I suppose "not much" was lost in a perverse way.

The proximity and order in time of the Sullivan and Wright fires is creepy!

 
At Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:14:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The home was being restored and was in the middle of serious work. See this photo taken just weeks before the fire gutted it:

http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/19089

The Moe House still stands: http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/19091

White flight has sure created some big destruction for old homes and districts from Detroit, to Gary, and so on. This is a real shame.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Found myself walking down South Michigan Avenue this morning, so I clicked these pics of the construction site of the Spertus Institute's new home.

Missing image - spertus1.jpg

The groundbreaking for the Spertus was October 7, though it appears that was more a ceremonial start than a construction start. From the looks of things today the demolition needs to be hauled away and then excavation can start for the building's foundation.

Missing image - spertus2sm.jpg
Click image for larger view

It might not be too exciting yet, but it's good to see things underway on what should be a great contribution to Chicago, and more specifically the Michigan Avenue streetwall overlooking Grant Park.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

What started as a renovation of an existing market turned into an urban redevelopment in and around the Avenida Cambo in Barcelona. But this dry description belies the executed work, designed by the late Eric Miralles's office EMBT.

Missing image - HD20a.jpg

The most distinctive feature of the design is the colored tile roof that undulates its way across the market below, visible to our feathered friends and those lucky enough to live in the adjacent buildings. Cantilevered portions create shade, and relief from inclement weather, as well as an interesting interaction with the existing market.

Missing image - HD20b.jpg

The sinuous structural system makes itself known in all aspects of the design, as it punctures through the roof, reaches the ground outside the old market walls, or overtly supports the wood roof above.

Missing image - HD20c.jpg

The complex project is actually three levels, with two below grade that include loading/unloading, parking, and an organic waste depository for the surrounding area. In many ways, its contribution to the city takes place at the two poles of above and below, not just the facades and inside, as might be expected in this type of project.

Links:
:: Mercat de Santa Caterina
:: EMBT
:: 0lll.com
:: archiseek
:: Fotos de arquitectura
:: Floornature

Labels:

4 Comments:

At Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:33:00 AM, Blogger Jennifer said...

That looks beautiful. I love Barcelona's architecture. Thanks for the glimpse.

 
At Friday, January 13, 2006 3:57:00 PM, Blogger Norman Blogster said...

Enric Miralles died in 2000.
Surely you should refer to EMBT as Benedetta Tagliabue's office now, seeing as she was the other partner and now leads the studio?

 
At Friday, January 13, 2006 6:04:00 PM, Blogger John said...

norman,
Granted it's her office now, but I believe this project had the involvement of Enric Miralles before his death. That was more my (apparently unclear) point in wording it that way.

 
At Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:55:00 AM, Anonymous Helen Parr said...

Even dead, Enric Miralles gives name to the office.

I live in Málaga, southern Spain, and this weekend I will be in Barcelona, so I can see the works finished and the market open!

Anyone wants some oranges -for instance-, just let me know ;)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 09, 2006

My weekly page update:
missing image - tschierva4sm.jpg
Chamanna Tschierva in Bernina, Switzerland by Hans-Jorg Ruch Architektur.

The updated book feature is Smart Architecture, by Ed van Hinte, Marc Neelen, Jacques Vink, and Piet Vollaard.

Some new blogs - at least to me - for your enjoyment (all added to the sidebar under architecture::blogs):
Interactive Architecture dot Org
"A weblog about the emerging practice within architecture that aims to merge the digital virtual with tangible and physical spatial experience."

Architecture and Morality
"Musings on Architecture, Urbanism, Politics, Economics and Religion."

archlog
"Architecture on the bias" set to "promote the books, events, and 'friends of' ... Princeton Architectural Press."

Sunday, January 08, 2006

Kazys wonders "Just what is going on in my hometown of Chicago?" after learning of the Berghoff closing and Marshall Field's transformation into a "Macy's outlet". Well, sometimes I wonder what's going on myself, and I still live here. From the rise of sidewalk studios to the Spire and the Tweezer, it appears that this city is grappling with its 21st century identity (for example, the sidewalk studios seem destined to bring a liveliness to the sidewalks of the Loop, all the while the city's Zoning Department requires insane amounts of parking to lure suburbanites back to the city). Granted that these various changes - proposed and happening - fall neatly into democratic ways and means, there doesn't seem to be anything cohesive holding all this together, even though we have a Mayor who's going to make his dad's term seem short by comparison. Sure, Daley has his masterplan that's pushing office space in the Loop westward to bring residences eastward towards his half a billion dollar park, but it's as if the only glue holding all the city's developments - public and private, Loop and neighborhood - together is trees, and recent news might affect that trend.

Here's some recent news that illuminates the good and bad of Chicago's current scene. (I'll let you decide what's what.)

The Chicago Journal reports that Preservation Chicago has obtained over 1,000 signatures to save a 100+ year old, three-story building at 1734 W. Wabansia, which is planned to be razed to make way for two single-family houses. The building is known for its ground floor tenant, the Artful Dodger, a neighborhood bar with a good selection of beer and a dance floor back room. Given that many locals feel strongly about the place (the article states most of the 1,024 signatures are from people that live in the area), it's surprising to hear the alderman state that he supports the demolition because it would "eliminate space for a corner tavern." Currently, the building is on a demolition hold list until February 18, after which its future is uncertain.

Missing image - artful-dodger.jpg
1734 W. Wabansia

In other preservation news, the Sun-Times reports that the New York Life Building at 39 South LaSalle is in jeopardy. But this building doesn't face an all-out demolition like the West Town bar above; the 12-story Loop office building designed by William Le Baron Jenney would instead be melded with a 50-story tower designed by Lucien Lagrange Architects. The current plan preserves two facades but would eat up about half of the interior, including parts of its ornate, marble lobby. The conceptual design appears to be like many other proposed towers in and around the Loop: slender, tall, and glassy. It makes a requisite gesture to Jenney's early steel-frame building, but the question is to what extent can new buildings encroach upon landmarks? And is an old building value merely limited to its facade, or does it include its structure (in this case groundbreaking for its time) and other internal elements? Beyond these questions are others - spurred by suburban developer Hamilton Partners' Itasca roots - such as the reasons behind suburban developers interests in city property and the responsibility behind those developments. It's one thing to develop in your own community, but it's definitely another to develop in an area so far removed.

Missing image - NY-life.jpg
New York Life Building

The Sun-Times also reports on a new office tower about one block from the New York Life Building: Jim DeStefano and Rick Keating's One South Dearborn. This design is notable for its crown, angled frosted-glass walls on the east and west elevations that are illuminated at night; its lobby, which features back-lit stone walls in a parallelogram-shaped space; and its plaza, which provides views of the north side of the Inland Steel Building, a Modernist icon, as well as another public space along Dearborn Avenue. Even though the setback is driven as much by parking as it is by the architect's reverence for its neighbor, a subtle spandrel articulation on the elevation up to the height of the Inland Steel forever weds One South Dearborn to its predecessor, even if were gone tomorrow.

Missing image - 1Sdearborn.jpg
One South Dearborn

3 Comments:

At Sunday, January 08, 2006 10:48:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought this kind of garbage only happenned in Dalllas...

 
At Monday, January 09, 2006 3:24:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Garbage? The One South building has garnered all sorts of architectural praise; see the linked article for one example. Dallas would do well to get something half as good.

 
At Monday, January 09, 2006 9:23:00 AM, Blogger Frank said...

The passing of Berghoff and Fields is sad, but such is life. New things come to the fore and others fade away.

The LaGrange proposal is hideous. You would think the rendering would at least give a favorable impression.

The new 7 S Dearborn is well done, but the skyscraper fan in me still would have liked seeing the SOM design built. It was a cool building that was interesting structurally also.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, January 06, 2006

A friend of mine e-mailed me this link in regard to the Deriugin House, a D.I.Y. structure soon to meet the wrecking ball. The link has photos and text on Bishop Castle "Another Self-Made Masterpiece," hosted by citynoise.org, a site new to me that describes itself as a "public photoblog where people with a love for the urban form, modern world, or a general appreciation of their environment gather to post stories, narratives and often upload photos of their favourite cities, hometowns, travels, or current locations."

Missing image - citynoise.jpg

Like yesterday's In The Weather, citynoise presents personal and idiosyncratic views of our surroundings, though it veers toward the photo-documented rather than the hand sketch, although that doesn't mean the occasional poem can't surface. Browsing through the Chicago section, there's plenty of individual variety though to me it seems that the details seem to take precedence. Which makes sense, as often those are the things we remember. A plant able to thrive in an alley. The accuracy of a sculpture. Urban decay. Graffiti.

1 Comments:

At Monday, January 09, 2006 10:47:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

AWESOMEST SITE EVER! i am totally gonna end up spending all day on that site! thanks for sharing it :)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

...In the good 'ol days:

Missing image - baptist1.jpg

...In The Blues Brothers:

Missing image - baptist2.jpg

...Today:

Missing image - baptist3.jpg

'Tis a shame.

(Thanks to Jeff for the head's up)

Update: This ain't the Blues Brothers church, as you can see by the first comment. If I'd hire a fact-checker I probably would've realized that one's at 3235 E. 91st, while the burning one's much farther north at 33rd and Indiana.

5 Comments:

At Friday, January 06, 2006 6:04:00 PM, Blogger Nevin ":-)" said...

The church in the Blues Brothers is a different church...

Sad to see this one go, though.

 
At Friday, January 06, 2006 9:41:00 PM, Blogger Levois said...

The loss of a landmark is always unfortunate.

 
At Monday, January 09, 2006 1:13:00 PM, Anonymous jeff said...

Oops -

I can't remember from what source I thought it was the Blues Bros church. Sorry for the misinformation.

 
At Monday, January 09, 2006 2:42:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's so sad to loose a Sullivan building...but since moving from Chicago I've learned that it's one of the only cities in the world that where the newspaper would publish an obituary (see Blair Kamin's article from a day or so ago) about a lost building. Course, there are none worth caring about losing in Phoenix....

 
At Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:46:00 PM, Anonymous malabar said...

Nice blog!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, January 05, 2006

In The Weather is a collection of self-guided walking tours started by Bonnie Fortune and Melinda Fries as "an exploration of the city both private and shared." Submitted walks are primarily in Chicago, ranging from the far north to the far south and from the clear and concise to the random and emotional. Whatever their differences, they are all personal and off the beaten path. You won't find any architecture tours of the Loop or Pilsen art walks. One of the most immediately architectural areas (the Pullman District on the far south side, below) leaves out any information on the place's buildings or features of note. Instead Erikka tells us to "execute twice daily" and "execute twice weekly with companion animal" along with some scribbled thoughts on walking, houses, and guitars. Quite personal.

Missing image - walking.jpg

The various maps - particularly ones like above and the information-heavy Gas for Less map below - remind me of Kevin Lynch's experiments in deciphering the legibility of cities (Boston, in the case of his classic study The Image of the City) and the sketches made by individuals as they were trying to describe how to get from point A to B, or a particular space, or the like. Like Lynch's study, In The Weather illustrates the variety of ways we experience, remember, and then illustrate the spaces and places we inhabit. In this case, I'm glad In The Weather focuses on walking as THE way of interacting with the city, rather than driving or even riding the bus or train. Not only is it the most immediate and flexible, but also the most natural and contemplative way for us to move about and experience our surroundings.

Missing image - gas4less.jpg

(via Ecology of Absence)

4 Comments:

At Friday, January 06, 2006 12:31:00 AM, Blogger Frank said...

Now you've got me all homesick!

I could pretty much picture every place listed on the Gas For Less map. As naive kids we wondered about the el gato 'Negro' bar. We thought it was odd to have a bar only for negros. We also used to pass the Gas For Less on the way home from Cubs games.

 
At Friday, January 06, 2006 9:59:00 AM, Blogger John said...

The Gas for Less is still there, though I can never tell if it's still operating. I hope it never closes, or at least if it does the new owner keeps that great sign.

 
At Friday, January 06, 2006 10:52:00 PM, Blogger Frank said...

They could open a diner specializing in low cost chili.

 
At Saturday, January 07, 2006 5:32:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

this reminds of Stanley Brouwn's "This Way Brouwn" project in the early 60's.
During his travels to several cities, Brouwn would ask passersby the route from a certain a to b point, requesting them to sketch the directions on paper. An early project on mapping the city.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Slowly getting back into the swing of things this New Year. Here's some new and few-day-old tidbits of interest to start off things:
:: architecture2030 is a new "non-profit, non-partisan and independent organization [whose] mission is to conduct research, and provide information and innovative solutions in the fields of architecture and planning, in an effort to address global climate change."

:: Deruigin House, an odd-looking, Watts Tower-ish D.I.Y. structure in Tacoma is to be demolished. (via things)

:: An architectural post by each Blowhard.

:: Varnelis ponders the rise of disaster tourism.

:: Space and Culture's current issue is available online, continuing the disaster theme.

:: A fascinating history of that road-spanning architecture, the Illinois Tollway Oasis...fascinating for Chicagoans, at least. (via Pruned)

:: Archinect's Best of 2005 begins with Mason White's picks. More to follow.

and finally

:: Gapers Block has named me one of the "Top 10 Chicago bloggers we wished we knew (but don't)"...be sure to check out the rest of the top 10s while you're there. (via The Place Where We Live)

2 Comments:

At Thursday, January 05, 2006 4:12:00 PM, Anonymous julie, architect in chicago said...

I would be loving 2030 so much more if it had more data and read less like propaganda. (The scientific community is not in accord that humans are causing global warming.) Loving the Tacoma house, shame to see that go. Once again, you've picked up on some good material. I see you're reading Murcutt, he's totally my hero.

 
At Thursday, January 05, 2006 6:21:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://archidose.blogspot.com/2005/07/peak-oil-recognition.html

its all related... question, how is it that you love Murcutt but are so suspicious about an attempt at sustainable design?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

    main.jpg
    books.jpg

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner